Home Maxims & Terms Constitutional guarantee meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Constitutional guarantee

Constitutional guarantee legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2026 PLD 206 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Art.20Freedom to profess religion and to manage religious institutionsConstitutional guaranteeScope

Article 20 of the Constitution has been interpreted as a broad guarantee of equal religious freedom for all citizens; Muslims and non-Muslims alike

Article 20 ensures both individual and collective rights of conscience, protecting citizens not only from interference by other religious groups but also from coercion within their own faith communities.

2016 MLD 723 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Arts. 4 & 8Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.VII, R.11Suit for declaration and recovery of damagesRejection of plaintConstitutional guaranteeService to poor

Plaintiffs were unqualified persons providing different dental services to poor people without holding any licence while Authorities started a campaign against them on the plea that they were the big source of causing "hepatitis B and C" to their customers

Validity

No act/omission, likely to cause even slightest harm to life and body, could be permitted under any plea regardless of its being under the name of 'social service' or 'help of the poor'

Plaintiffs were seeking exception to requirement of 'qualification' on the sole ground of 'working for decades' to earn livelihood

Ground could not legally sustain particularly in view of Art. 8 of the Constitution, which had even declared any law, or any custom or usage, having force of law, to the extent of its inconsistency with rights (known fundamental rights) as 'void'

Law demanded proper authorization and qualification from competent legal forum to let one work/act as 'dentist' which, undisputedly, the plaintiffs did not possess

Registration of any society was meant to regularize the affairs of members and it could not be used as licence/certificate to do a job which, otherwise, could not be performed without such licence/certificate

Not the 'experience' which could qualify one to dress himself up with a 'status' which, otherwise, could not be held without proper and legal 'degree'

Suit of plaintiffs was not maintainable under the law and the same could not be legally allowed to continue on the file of Court, because provision of O. VII, R. 11, C.P.C. insisted to reject a legally barred plaint in its inception

Plaint was rejected, in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Constitutional guarantee", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124955769

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Constitutional guarantee"

PLD 2026
Writ Petition No. 1560 of 2026, decided on 18th February, 2026.

P L D 2026 Lahore 480

MUHAMMAD SOBAN — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1995
Criminal Appeal No. 224 of 1987, decided on 13th April, 1991.

1995SCMR626

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1984
Civil Appeal No. 24 of 1979, decided on 30th April, 1984.

P L D 1984 Supreme Court 354

PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus Civil Appeal No. 24 of 1979, decided on 30th April, 1984.

Court: Art. 185(3)-Civil service-Leave to appeal granted to consider question whether in the context of temporary nature of employment of a civil servant, until further orders, and being further "subject to approval of Federal Public Service Commission or replacement if choice of Commission did not fall on him" his employment was correctly construed as being amenable to constitutional guarantee.--Civil services.
PLD 1964
Constitutional Petition No. 746 of 1962, decided on 3rd October 1963.

P L D 1964 (W

DR. Miss AZIZ BEGUM CHOUDHRY‑Petitioner Versus DIRECTOR, GENERAL HEALTH ESTABLISHMENT

Court:
PLD 2025
2024-December-17

P L D 2025 Balochistan 25

MUNAWAR KHAN — Petitioner Versus The GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Chief Secretary and 8 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1997
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No‑105‑Q of 1996, decided on 25th June 1997.

P L D 1997 Supreme Court 835

OBAIDULLAH and another ;Petitioners Versus HABIBULLAH and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court:
PLC(CS) 1999
Writ Petition No. 15261 of 1996, decided on 22nd September, 1997.

1999 P L C (C

ABDUL WAHID FAROOQ Versus CHIEF SECRETARY, PUNJAB and others

Court: Lahore High Court
PLD 1998
1996-June-26

P L D 1998 Karachi 124

ZULFIQAR ALI — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: High Court
MLD 1997
Criminal Miscellaneous No.268‑H of 1995, heard on 23rd May, 1995

1997 M L D 1331

MUHAMMAD MANZOOR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus S.H.O., POLICE STATION LAYYA, DISTRICT MULTAN

Court: Lahore
PLC(CS) 1983
Appeal No. 30 (K) of 1974, decided on 15th February, 1982.

1983 P L C (C

Miss AZIZ BEGUM CHOUDHRY Versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND

Court: Federal Service Tribunal