Public Law
Public Law legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Petitioners were aggrieved of additional security imposed by Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Limited (SNGPL) as Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority revised sale prices and tariff for zero rated industry operated on indigenous gas
Validity
Issue did not merely pit one consumer against SNGPL but an entire industry was in tension with SNGPL
Acts set in motion by SNGPL had a spiral effect not only on the petitioners but also on economy in general as petitioners were export oriented industries and were a major source of earning of foreign exchange
Any impact on petitioners would affect public purse and trickle down to the general public
There was a public law element inviting High Court to a searching inquiry and High Court could not sit in a state of judicial inertia
SNGPL exercised sovereign function of State
There was a monopoly so far as half of the country was concerned
SNGPL was a State owned public utility company and its actions were justiceable by High Court
Judicial review could be applied in certain circumstances to exercise of public contractual power
Public law principles were to be applied to executive agencies such as SNGPL as it was not formally separate from its sponsoring department and also because it was engaged in public service delivery
Test that was to be applied by courts was that the process might have a sufficient public law element irrespective of any connection with a statute or policy
Regarding contractual powers, preponderant approach was to regard contracts made by public authorities as subject to judicial review if there was a sufficiently "public law element" to the matter
Issue raised by petitioners was not purely contractual but related to rule of law and was to be judged on the basis of principles of administrative law such as irrationality and impropriety
High Court set aside the notices issued by authorities to petitioners
Constitutional petition was allowed, in circumstances.
Legal person established in the public interest generally incurred no civil liability where it made or passed a regulation or by-law that was subsequently held to be invalid, unless its decision to do so was made in bad faith or was irrational
Purpose of said immunity was to preserve the latitude that a legal person established in the public interest must have in order to make policy decisions in the interests of the community
However, legal person established in the public interest that made an error of law in implementing its own regulations or by-laws may be civilly liable.
Purpose of setting up a distinct autonomous Authority as opposed to a department or attached department of the Government
Purpose, scope and extent of such autonomy, described.
Administrative agencies, like all other institutions, develop special capabilities and proficiencies in the performance of their tasks and to say that an institution had integrity was to suggest that it was faithful to the functions, values, and distinctive set of unifying principles that defined its special competence and character
Preservation of institutional integrity involved protecting the institution from injury, destruction or decay and also protecting institutional processes, values, and unifying principles that determined an institution's distinctive competence
Integrity, at the institutional level, implied an organization that defined, and acted within a strong code of ethical conduct and positive values, and that adopted no tolerance of attitudes, actions and activities by its employees or partners that deviate from such code
Said concept was strongly interlinked with the principle of transparency, implying openness, communication and accountability and as far as organizations and institutions were concerned, the key aspect was that an integrity-based organization performed its tasks in line with its intended purpose, and was operated in a transparent, accountable, decent, ethical, faultless and invulnerable manner
Behaviour of the individuals was consistent with the values and goals that were being followed, and the organization and their associates took all necessary steps to do their work in compliance with such values
Institutional integrity in the public sector was particularly important due to the public character of these institutions that implied public trust in the institution's practices, operations, and policies.
Purpose of setting up a distinct autonomous Authority as opposed to a department or attached department of the Government
Purpose, scope and extent of such autonomy, described.
Administrative agencies, like all other institutions, develop special capabilities and proficiencies in the performance of their tasks and to say that an institution had integrity was to suggest that it was faithful to the functions, values, and distinctive set of unifying principles that defined its special competence and character
Preservation of institutional integrity involved protecting the institution from injury, destruction or decay and also protecting institutional processes, values, and unifying principles that determined an institution's distinctive competence
Integrity, at the institutional level, implied an organization that defined, and acted within a strong code of ethical conduct and positive values, and that adopted no tolerance of attitudes, actions and activities by its employees or partners that deviate from such code
Said concept was strongly interlinked with the principle of transparency, implying openness, communication and accountability and as far as organizations and institutions were concerned, the key aspect was that an integrity-based organization performed its tasks in line with its intended purpose, and was operated in a transparent, accountable, decent, ethical, faultless and invulnerable manner
Behaviour of the individuals was consistent with the values and goals that were being followed, and the organization and their associates took all necessary steps to do their work in compliance with such values
Institutional integrity in the public sector was particularly important due to the public character of these institutions that implied public trust in the institution's practices, operations, and policies.
"Public Law", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124955860
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Public Law"
1992 M L D 2273
ALI IRTAZA‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PRINCIPAL, LAWRENCE COLLEGE, GORAH GALLI, MURREE, DISTRICT RAWALPINDI and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2023 C L C 324
GHAZI FABRICS INTERNATIONAL LTD. and 3 others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and 6 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2013 S C M R 66
Dr. MEHMOOD NAYYAR AZAM — Appellant Versus STATE OF CHHATTISGARH and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of India2005 Y L R 2859
MUHAMMAD SADDIQUE — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary of Law, Justice and Human Rights Division, Islamabad and 3 others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP LD 2016 Lahore 412
KITCHEN CUISINE (PVT) LTD. — Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2021 M L D 2129
PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through District Officer (Revenue)/District Collector, Khushab and 2 others — Petitioner Versus ATTA RASOOL and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore2012 S C M R 1549
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI — Appellant Versus ASSOCIATION OF VICTIMS OF UPHAAR TRAGEDY and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of India2017 C L C 426
ZAHID HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus The CHAIRMAN SELECTION COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN BALOCHISTAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Balochistan2026 Y L R 482
Basheer Ahmed and others — Petitioners Versus Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry Natural Sources, Islamabad and others — Respondents
Court: Sindh (Sukkur Bench)2024 M L D 183
Mst. ANEEQA SOHAIL and others — Petitioners Versus LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Chairman and 3 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore