Restriction on transfer of property
Restriction on transfer of property legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Sale transaction in favour of objector by virtue of deed of conveyance was entered into between the objector and judgment-debtor on 30-03-2012, i.e., much after the proceedings of banking suit
Two basic conditions as mentioned in S. 23(1) & (2) of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001, were available to decree holder
If a transaction in question was prohibited under an express provision of a statute then such transaction could not be saved on the ground that since it was under a registered instrument, therefore, to give effect to an express provision of law, an independent proceeding under S. 39 of Specific Relief Act, 1877, was to be instituted
Such would destroy the very purpose of S. 23 of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001, and if a transaction did not take place through a registered instrument but in violation of S. 23 of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001, the same could be dealt with without instituting a separate proceeding
Objection was dismissed in circumstances.
"Restriction on transfer of property", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124955965
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Restriction on transfer of property"
P L D 1962 Dacca 126
BASHIRULLAH AND OTHERS‑‑Petitioners Versus THE PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN AND OTHERS Respondents
Court:2016 C L D 1028
ASKARI BANK LTD. — Decree Holder Versus A.H. INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD. and others — Judgment Debtors
Court: SindhP L D 1966 (W
Haji ASHFAQ AHMAD KHAN AND OTHERS — Petitioners Versus CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY, PAKISTAN
Court: (c) Transfer of Property (Pakistan) Ordinance (IV of 1947)----S. 3 before amendment by Finance Ordinance (XV of 1959), S.4‑Income‑tax clearance certificate granted by Inspecting Assistant Commissioner‑Cannot be cancelled by Income‑tax Officer‑Transaction already completed as result of certificate granted‑General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S. 21‑Cannot empower Income‑tax Authorities to pass order affecting such transaction.1995 P T D 1221
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Versus RAJ KUMARI BHUBANESHWARI KUMARI
Court: 210 I T R 711P L D 1961 Dacca 445
CHITTA RANJAN SUTAR‑Petitioner Versus THE SECRETARY, JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court:2024 P Cr
SHAFFAT IBRAHIM KHAN — Petitioner Versus CHAIRMAN NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU and others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1953 Peshawar 1
Mst. INAYAT BEGUM‑Plaintiff‑Appellant Versus Mst. MARYAM BIBI and another‑Defendants‑Respondents.
Court:P L D 1962 (W
Dr. PESHOTON‑Plaintiff Versus PEEROZSHAW AND ANOTHER‑Defendants
Court:P L D 1958 (W
MOHSIN & TAHIR‑Petitioners Versus FEROZE NANA GHULAMALY and another
Court: High Court1983 C I
MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM‑Appellant Versus Yaji RAMZAN‑Respondent
Court: Karachi