Quasi-judicial act
Quasi-judicial act legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Quasi judicial act was usually not one of a judicial tribunal, but of a public authority or officer, which was presumably the product or result of investigation, consideration, and human judgment, based on evidentiary facts of some sort in a matter within the discretionary power of such authority or officer.
"Quasi-judicial act", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124957032
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Quasi-judicial act"
P L D 1955 Lahore 263
Haji MEHRBAN AHMAD‑ — Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER, RAWALPINDI DIVISION, and others‑ — Respondents
Court: Case‑law referred to.P L D 2021 Lahore 499
Qari MUHAMMAD ARIF — Petitioner Versus SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1976 Quetta 77
MUHAMMAD YAQOOB-Petitioner Versus ZAHIR ALAM AND 10 OTHERS-RESPONDENTS
Court: -- Art. 199-Writ jurisdiction-Power of judicial review available to High Court-Does not extend to investigation into questions of fact or appraisal of evidence touching issues falling within authority of administrative tribunals or executive functionaries--Exception : where finding ex facie perverse and not supported by any evidence.-Writ.P L D 1956 (W
MIR ALI AHMAD KHAN‑Petitioner Versus THE PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN‑Respondent
Court:P L D 2026 Islamabad 51
MASTAN WALI KHAN — Petitioner Versus PRIME MINISTER OF PAKISTAN/CHAIRMAN, GILGIT-BALTISTAN COUNCIL through Principal Secretary PM Secretariat and others — Respondents
Court: High Court1993 P T D 1078
INDUPRASAD CHUNIBHAI PATEL Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES and others
Court: 200 I T R 688P L D 1960 (W
Sardar ABDUL RAZAK KHAN KHOSO‑Petitioner Versus THE CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY
Court: (b) Writ‑Petition‑Court to consider petition as it is, and not to examine argument raising additional matter‑Petition challeng ing merely " notice " of demand of Estate duty‑High Court refused to entertain argument that " order of assessment " which was basis of notice, was partially illegal‑Constitution of Pakistan (1956), Art. 170‑Pakistan v. Khondkar Ali Afzal and another P L D 1960 S C (Pak.) 1 ref.1981 P L C (C
M. ENVER SHAUKAT Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER
Court: Lahore High CourtP L D 1956 (W
M. ABDUL MAJID‑Petitioner Versus THE WEST PAKISTAN PROVINCE and two others — ‑Respondents
Court:P L D 2020 Sindh 616
AAM LOG ITTEHAD through Secretary General and another — Petitioners Versus The ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary and 4 others — Respondents
Court: High Court