Consolidation of holding
Consolidation of holding legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Claim of the petitioner was that, land previously owned and possessed by him, was included in the consolidation scheme of the respondents; that petitioner came to know about that fact when respondents tried to take possession of said land
Petitioner contended that he did not put his signatures on the register of scheme for the reasons that he was never ready to give his land to the respondents
Petitioner, had alleged that he had been deprived of his valuable land, which was against the spirit of law on the subject
Consolidation Scheme of Mauza concerned was confirmed by Consolidation Officer
Petitioner, feeling aggrieved by that order, filed a time barred appeal before Deputy District Officer (Consolidation), which was accepted
Said order was assailed by the respondents before the Additional Commissioner (Consolidation) through appeal; which appeal was accepted
Validity
Collector (Consolidation), sanctioned scheme; and respondents were allotted land measuring 10 Kanal, 12 Marla under such scheme; and that they sold out the same through mutation, while pendency of instant litigation which meant that respondents had accepted the impugned scheme through their conduct
Such act of the respondents had rendered themselves ineligible for the relief they obtained through impugned order of Executive District Officer (Revenue) whereby scheme was sanctioned, by selling the specific numbers allotted to them
Revision petition was accepted, and impugned order passed by Executive District Officer, was set aside.
"Consolidation of holding", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124957060
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Consolidation of holding"
P L D 1953 Lahore 61
NAZIR AHMAD‑‑(Decree‑holder), Appellant Versus ANJUMAN IMDAD BAHMI, ISATIMAL ARAZI of MAUZA MIRPUR and another‑(Judgment -debtors), Respondents
Court:P L D 1973 Lahore 543
FAIZ MUHAMMAD KHAN‑Petitioner Versus THE BOARD OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT OF
Court:P L D1961 (W
IMAM BIBI AND OTHERS‑Appellants Versus SUKAR DIN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: If a society formed under the Co‑operative Societies Act, 1912 takes upon itself the work of the consolidation ' of holdings, its actions will be governed by the bye‑laws of the society and the rules framed under section 43 of the Act. The provisions of the Punjab Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1936 in such a case will have no application. The only remedy available to an aggrieved person against the allotment made by the society would be to apply to the Registrar under rule 18 (a) and (b) of the Co‑operative Societies Rules, 1912 and not to appeal to the Collector under section 9 of the Punjab Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1936. p. 485 A & BP L D 1954 Lahore 371
Mst. JANTAN and others‑Plaintiffs‑Appellants Versus KHAN MUHAMMAD and others‑Defendants‑Respondents
Court:1971 S C M R 474
MUHAMMAD YAR KHAN AND 6 OTHERS‑Appellants Versus I. U. KHAN, MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE, WEST PAKISTAN, LAHORE AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: High Court2014 Y L R 2185
ATTA MUHAMMAD and another — Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, TOUNSA SHARIF and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1986 M L D 2386
UMAR DIN and others‑‑Petitioners Versus MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE and others‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1992 C L C 660
Mst. ALAM KHATOON and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Mst. ALAM KHATOON and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Board of Revenue PunjabP L D 1976 Lahore 1061
Ch. NOOR MUHAMMAD KHAN‑Petitioner Versus THE BOARD OF REVENUE, WEST PAKISTAN THROUGH
Court:2012 M L D 1106
ALI SHER and 11 others — Petitioners Versus ABDUL HAQ and 39 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore