Preliminary investigations
Preliminary investigations legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Complainant did not utter a word in his testimony that application had been prepared on his dictation or that it was ever read over to him or he signed it or not
Complainant contended in his testimony that he got recorded application which was dictated by an advocate to a computer operator/steno
Statements of prosecution witnesses did not paint an unblemished picture regarding prosecution case as their testimonies were inconsistent, discrepant and contradictory, inter se, besides entailing a touch of countless improbabilities, hence liable to be brushed aside
Prosecution case was more of a cock and bull story so far as involvement of accused was concerned
Conviction and sentence of accused could not be maintained on such quality of evidence
High Court set aside conviction and sentence of accused recorded by Trial Court and acquitted him of the charge
Appeal was allowed in circumstances.
"Preliminary investigations", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124957708
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Preliminary investigations"
P L D 1991 Lahore 241
GHULAM SHAHBAZ — Petitioner Versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION SADDAR KEHROR
Court: High CourtP L D 1971 Supreme Court 677
SHAHNAZ BEGUM-Appellant Versus THE HON'BLE JUDGES OF THE HIGH COURT OF SIND AND BALUCHISTAN AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Court: Meaning-High Court under cl. 22 (in case no investigation initiated) has power to direct preliminary investigation to be started even by officer ordinarily not vested with territorial jurisdiction-High Court has no power to direct transfer of investigation from one officer to another-Words "direct" and "preliminary investigation"-Connotation-Words "preliminary investigation" in cl. 22 not same thing as "investigation" contemplated under Cr. P. C. Chauhar Khan v. The State P L D 1971 Lah. 328 overruled.1988 P Cr
ZAHOOR AHMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus S.H.O. P.S. OKARA‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore2004 P Cr
JAMSHED alias JAMMI‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE and others‑‑-Respondents
Court: Peshawar1989 M L D 2936
ABID KHAN and others — Petitioners Versus MUSHTAQ and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1993 P Cr
Mian MUHAMMAD SAEED and another — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD AHSAN SALEEM and another — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1987 Lahore 196
GUL MUHAMMAD alias GULLU‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: ‑ Ss. ?02 & 323‑F. 1. R. lodged after preliminary investigation at spot‑Value of‑Witness admitting recording of F. 1. R. at spot Recovery memos. of articles recovered from spot, not bearing name of accused‑Inquest report not containing F. 1. R. number‑F. I. R. having been recorded after preliminary investigation and name of accused being not known till recoveries were effected at spot, such F. I. R., held, would not be reliable and was inadmissible in evidence‑Accused acquitted in circumstances.‑First .information Report.1990 C L C 1500
THE STATE‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN MEDICAL & DENTAL COUNCIL, ISLAMABAD‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore1989 P Cr
ALI MUHAMMAD‑ ‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore1981 P L C (C
MANZOOR ALI Versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, C & W DEPARTMENT
Court: Service Tribunal Punjab