Computation of period
Computation of period legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Insured person died on 23-8-2007, policy holder approached the insurer but her claim was rejected vide letter dated, 13-8-2009
Policy holder testified that Insurer had sought original passport of the insured person on 28-6-2012 which letter referred to another letter issued by Insurer on 30-5-2011, wherein policy holder was reminded to supply documents, so that Insurer could proceed further
Correspondence in the context of S.19, Limitation Act, 1908, held, was an acknowledgement of liability in writing which acknowledgement was made before the expiry of the period of limitation
Period of limitation got a new lease of life by virtue of said letters, as such the claim filed on 14-9-2013 was within prescribed period of limitation
Appeal was dismissed, accordingly.
If the day of termination of limitation was a public holiday, the same had to be excluded while computing limitation.
"Computation of period", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124958525
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Computation of period"
1981 C L C 2
MANZOOR AHMED‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: Azad J & K1992 P L C (C
Malak MUHAMMAD KHAN Versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE and others
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2001 Azad J&K 4
DIL MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus RIAYASAT HUSSAIN
Court: High Court1992 S C M R 1136
Malak MUHAMMAD KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus INSPECTOR‑GENERAL OF POLICE and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2004 Lahore 349
ZAFAR HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Begum FARZANA NAZLI and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2001 Quetta 60
MUHAMMAD ESSAA KHAN and 4 others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through
Court: High Court1980 S C M R 36
Mst. RUKHSANA AHMAD-Petitioner Versus TARIQ ATAULLAH-Respondent
Court: --Ss. 5 & 12-Appeal-Limitation - lime requisite for obtaining certified copy of ejectment order even if computed from date of applica tion for grant of copy to date of its delivery, first appeal filed by petitioner barred by one day-No explanation given for condonation of delay and no error in computation of period by High Court shown-Order passed by High Court dismissing appeal-Held un exceptionable in circumstances.-Appeal (civil)-Limitation.1992 P L C (C
AIJAZ AHMED KHAN and others Versus CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and 37 others
Court: Service Tribunal Sindh1998 P L C (C
ABDUL HAFEEZ SIDDIQI Versus GENERAL MANAGER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS H.Q., LAHORE and another
Court: Federal Service Tribunal1984 C L C 2351
Syed MUHAMMAD ALI — ‑Appellant Versus DR. MUHAMMAD SULTAN ZAKARIA‑ — Respondent
Court: Karachi