1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Malak MUHAMMAD KHAN Versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE and others
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Ajmal Mian and Saleem Akhtar, JJ |
| Parties | Malak MUHAMMAD KHAN Versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE and others |
| Primary Law | (b) Civil service, (c) Limitation Act (IX of 1908), (a) Sindh Police (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1983 |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: (b) Civil service, (c) Limitation Act (IX of 1908), (a) Sindh Police (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1983 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Ajmal Mian and Saleem Akhtar, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (Malak MUHAMMAD KHAN Versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE and others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Faizanul Haque, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 10th September, 1991.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Sindh Services Tribunal in Appeal No.23 of 1991, dated 28-4-1991).
R.13(h)
Order of reversion of civil servant
Only one appeal could be filed against the original order and order of Appellate Authority would be final
Civil servant's further appeal before the higher departmental Authority was not competent.
Civil servant's departmental appeal having been rejected he filed further appeal which was not warranted by law
Civil servant's appeal before Service Tribunal was dismissed as time-barred.
S.14
Exclusion of time from computation of period of limitation
Time spent in filing further appeal before higher Departmental Authority being not warranted by law, time spent in filing and prosecuting such appeal could not be taken into consideration in computing the period of limitation.
Judgment & Decree
(a) Sindh Police (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1983
R.13(h)
Order of reversion of civil servant
Only one appeal could be filed against the original order and order of Appellate Authority would be final
Civil servant's further appeal before the higher departmental Authority was not competent. (b) Civil service
Civil servant's departmental appeal having been rejected he filed further appeal which was not warranted by law
Civil servant's appeal before Service Tribunal was dismissed as time-barred. (c) Limitation Act (IX of 1908)
S.14
Exclusion of time from computation of period of limitation
Time spent in filing further appeal before higher Departmental Authority being not warranted by law, time spent in filing and prosecuting such appeal could not be taken into consideration in computing the period of limitation. Faizanul Haque, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 10th September, 1991.