Home Maxims & Terms Application for eviction meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Application for eviction

Application for eviction legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2016 CLCN 81 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 15, 8 & 9Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199Constitutional petitionApplication for evictionNo extension in the lease period was agreedTenant was liable to be evicted when the lease agreement expiredTenant refused to vacate the premises on demand by landlady

Preliminary objection through leave to appeal was that ejectment petition was not maintainable without making payment of the penalty under S. 9(b) of the Punjab Rented Premises Act, 2009

Special Judge (Rent) was competent to pass order to deposit the fine under S. 9(b) of the Act

Tenancy between the parties became in conformity with the provisions of the Act when the landlady deposited amount of fine at the rate of 10% as per direction of the Special Judge (Rent)

Ejectment petition was allowed and tenant was directed to vacate the demised shop within one month

Petition of the tenant was dismissed.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Application for eviction", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124958529

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Application for eviction"

CLC 1981
1980-April-20

1981 C L C 1386

ABDUR REHMAN‑Appellant Versus Sh. ABDUR RASHID ‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1990
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 500 of 1989, decided on 13th June, 1989.

1990 S C M R 544

NISAR AHMAD KHAN‑‑Petitioner Versus NOOR MUHAMMAD KHAN and 6 others‑‑Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 1990
Writ Petitions Nos.901 and 904 of 1982, heard on 3rd December, 1989.

1990 C L C 1277

JAN MUHAMMAD and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD SARWAR and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1991
First Rent Appeal No.553 of 1989, decided on 7th March, 1991.

1991 C L C 1733

TARIQ NLAZ ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus MASOODA BEGUM‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
CLC 1989
First Rent Appeal No.896 of 1986, decided on 13th July, 1988.

1989 C L C 969

Mst. KALSOOM BEGUM‑‑Appellant Versus Messrs ELITE CONE INDUSTRIES and another‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 1977
S. A. O. No. 72 of 1977 decided on 4th February 1977.

P L D 1977 Lahore 532

MANSOOR AHMED-Appellant Versus BASHIR HUSSAIN BABRI-Respondent

Court:
CLC 1982
Civil Revision No. 778 of 1980, decided on 25th November, 1980.

1982 C L C 758

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD MUNIR‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1975
Civil Appeal No. 46 of 197'2, decided on 17th April 1974.

1975 S C M R 99

MUMTAZ ETC.-Appellants Versus THE DISTRICT JUDGE, SARGODHA ETC. — Respondents

Court: -- S. 10 and West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)-Whether Civil Procedure Code, 1908, S. 10 applicable to proceeding under Ordinance VI of 1959 Quaere.
MLD 1997
Writ Petition No.28 of 1996, decided on 12th November, 1996.

1997 M L D 2137

ABDUL MAJEED‑‑‑Petitioner Versus DISTRICT JUDGE, MIRPUR and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
PLD 1978
Writ Petition No. 375 of 1977, decided on 23rd February 1977.

P L D 1978 Lahore 488

MRs. FEROZE ASLAM-Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AKHTAR-Respondent

Court: -- S. 15-Appeal-Landlord's application for eviction of tenant not finally disposed of-Landlord having right of appeal in event of final orders being passed on his application entitled to challenge in such appeal all interlocutory orders not independently appealable under S. 15-Interlocutory order passed by Rent Controller setting aside an earlier ex parte ejectment order being thus appealable, contention that petitioner would have no remedy against impugned order except by way of writ petition, held, not correct-Writ petition not entertainable in case of appeal against similar orders being not competent and party aggrieved to wait till final order passed entitling it to file appeal under S. 15.-Writ-Appeal (civil).