1981 PLP 1386 (CLC)
ABDUR REHMAN‑Appellant Versus Sh. ABDUR RASHID ‑Respondent
| Citation | 1981 PLP 1386 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ABDUR REHMAN‑Appellant Versus Sh. ABDUR RASHID ‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | (a) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 1386 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: (a) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 1386 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 1386 (CLC) (ABDUR REHMAN‑Appellant Versus Sh. ABDUR RASHID ‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Sh. Khurshid Ahmad for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 13 (3) (a) (ii) (a) Eviction of tenant‑‑Bona fide requirement of landlord‑Earlier application for eviction filed when shop in suit ire joint ownership and not partitioned and application for eviction also jointly filed against tenant theft in occupation‑‑Shop later parti tioned and respondent‑landlord letting it out to appellant‑Contention that respondent having got shop vacated and not occupied same no application for eviction could be filed subsequently, held, devoid of force.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑ S. 13 (3) (a) (ii) (a)‑‑‑‑Eviction of tenant‑‑Bona fide requirement of landlord‑Landlord stating to have been carrying on business of stamp making alongwith his son in front of shop in dispute at foot of stairs on a strip-less than 2 feet belonging to Municipal Committee‑Statement held, quite sufficient to establish bona fides of landlord. Haji Ghulam Muhammad v. Abdul Qadir P L D 1975 Lab. 200 ; Muhammad Siddique V. Mistri Muhammad Aslam P L D 1975 Lah. 308 and Mansoor Ahmad v. Bashir Hussain Babri P L D 1977 Lab. 346 rel. (a) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)
‑ S. 13 (3) (a) (ii) (a) ‑‑‑Eviction of tenant‑‑Bona fide requirement of landlord‑ Lanwlor6, held, cannot be deprived of benefit of his own shop for reason of having increased rent of shop previously. (a) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)
S. 13 (3) (a) (ii) (a) Eviction of tenant‑‑Bona fide requirement of landlord‑Earlier application for eviction filed when shop in suit ire joint ownership and not partitioned and application for eviction also jointly filed against tenant theft in occupation‑‑Shop later parti tioned and respondent‑landlord letting it out to appellant‑Contention that respondent having got shop vacated and not occupied same no application for eviction could be filed subsequently, held, devoid of force. Malik Muhammad Nawaz for Appellant. Sh. Khurshid Ahmad for Respondent. Date of hearing : 20th April, 1980.