Home Maxims & Terms Revision and appeal meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Revision and appeal

Revision and appeal legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2016 CLCN 119 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Ss. 115 & 96Revision and appealComparisonRevisional jurisdiction could not be equated with that of appellate jurisdictionRevision was meant to correct an illegality/irregularity in result of mis-reading or non-reading of evidenceQuestion of jurisdiction or excess jurisdiction would involve in the revision whereas in appeal whole case would open

Revisional court had authority to ensure no 'injustice' or 'serious prejudice' to the parties and could examine illegalities/irregularities; excess of jurisdiction and non-exercise of jurisdiction.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Revision and appeal", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124958532

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Revision and appeal"

MLD 1988
1988-May-8

1988 M L D 980

I.C.I. PAKISTAN MANUFACTURERS Ltd: -Appellant Versus SALAH-UD-DIN and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1991
Civil Appeals Nos.220 and 221 of 1979, decided on 21st February, 1991.

1991 S C M R 1135

SHAMSUL HAQ and others — Appellants Versus Mst. GHOTI and 8 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 2009
Civil Appeal No.742 of 2008, decided on 17th December, 2008.

2009 S C M R 589

GUL REHMAN — Appellant Versus GUL NAWAZ KHAN — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
YLR 2014
Revision Petition No. 47 and Civil Appeal No. 29 of 2009, decided on 13th May, 2013.

2014 Y L R 336

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF KHAN RAJA — Petitioner Versus KHAN MIR KHAN and another — Respondents

Court: High Court (AJ&K)
MLD 2005
N/A

2005 M L D 1710

MANZOOR and 9 others — Petitioners Versus ALI MUHAMMAD KHAN — Respondent

Court: Lahore
CLC 2012
2011-September-21

2012 C L C 4

ABDUL RAZZAK — Petitioner Versus LAL BUX and another — Respondents

Court: Sindh
PLD 1978
Civil Revision No. 14 of 1976, decided on 30th April 1978.

P L D 1978 Quetta 107

MUHAMMAD UMAR AND 3 OTHERS — Petitioners Versus Munshi YAR MUHAMMAD — Respondent

Court: --- S. 115 read with S. 96-Revision-Words "case decided" in S. 115 Meaning-Remedy by way of revision--Not available if decision capable of correction in appeal-Intention of Legislature in providing scope of correction of irregularities committed by subordinate Courts both in revision and appeal.-Words and phrases-Revision (civil).
YLR 2003
N/A

2003 Y L R 1475

MUHAMMAD KHAN‑‑‑Appellant Versus SALEHUN MUHAMMAD ‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
CLC 1982
Writ Petition No. 44 of 1980, decided on 19th December, 1981.

1982 C L C 1439

Ch. SADDAR DIN‑Petitioner Versus CHAIRMAN, REVISING AUTHORITY MIRPUR DEVELOPMENT

Court: Azad J&K
MLD 2008
2008-March-26

2008 M L D 978

THE STATE through Investigating Officer — Appellant Versus MANSOOR AHMED — Respondent

Court: Karachi