Home Maxims & Terms Duty of appellate Authority meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Duty of appellate Authority

Duty of appellate Authority legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2017 PLD 19 ISLAMABAD-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 24-ACivil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.XLI, R.31Exercise of powers under an enactmentExpression "give reason", in S.24-A, General Clauses Act, 1897Requirement ofDuty of appellate AuthorityStatutory Appellate Authority acting as a quasi-judicial authority, was also to apply its mind and give reasons

Appellate forum was although not required to state the points arising for determination and then to give decision thereon, as required by O.XLI, R.31, C.P.C. but reason were nevertheless, required to be given for the appellate order

Requirement of giving reasons was equally applicable to appellate orders

Order disposing the appeal must indicate that there had been proper application of mind by the Authority to all the pleas raised and the reasons for the decision were also to be explicit in the order itself.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Duty of appellate Authority", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124958545

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Duty of appellate Authority"

PLD 1967
2nd December 1963

P L D 1967 Karachi 35

Khan GHULAM HASAN KHAN-Appellant Versus DR. RASHID AHMED-Respondent

Court: High Court
CLC 1998
Second Appeal from Order No. 165 of 1997, heard on 11th February, 1998.

(a) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)﷓﷓﷓

ZAHEER MUHAMMAD ‑‑‑Appellant Versus TAHIR HUSSAIN MALIK ‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 2017
2016-April-26

P L D 2017 Islamabad 19

MUHAMMAD MAJID — Petitioner Versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF MANPOWER AND OVERSEAS EMPLOYMENT, ISLAMABAD and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PTD 1966
This is a reference application under section 66 (1) of the Income‑tax Act which arises out of the order of the Tribunal passed in registration appeal I. T. A. No. 79 of 1947‑48 decided on 23rd December 1948. In our opinion, questions of law do arise out of the Tribunal's order. We accordingly draw up the following statement of the case.

1966 P T D 502

MANNILAL SAGARMAL Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, U. P.

Court: Allahabad (India)
PTD 1990
I.TAs. Nos. 6234 & 6235/LB of 1986‑87, and 990 & 991/LB of 1988‑89, decided on 30th August, 1989.

1990 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income‑tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PLD 1965
Writ Petitions Nos. 182 and 183 of 1962, decided on 7th August 1964.

P L D 1965 (W

AHMAD YAR‑ — Petitioner Versus (1) SECRETARY To GOVERNMENT of WEST PAKISTAN, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, AND

Court: (a) Government servant------Colonization Staff engaged under Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act (V of 1912) Senior Clerk‑Colony later wound up and staff" placed under administrative control of Settlement Officer, no "Colonization Officer" being in existence any longer‑Reduction in rank by such officer after inquiry and notice, held, valid‑Dismissal by Commissioner, in proceeding taken by way of appeal by Government servant concerned, held, valid‑Constitution of Pakistan (1956), Art. 181‑No bar against authority superior to appointing authority to dismiss or reduce in rank‑Article 181 does not require that order initiating inquiry or inquiry itself must be made by, appointing authority‑Civil Services Rules (Punjab), Vol. I, Rr. .I, 14'15 Punjab District Subordinate Service Rules., r. 21.
PLD 1966
1st June 1965

P L D 1966 (W

Khan NASRULLAH KHAN-Petitioner Versus (1) THE MEMBER, ELECTION COMMISSION, GOVERNMENT OF

Court: (c) Jurisdiction-Superior Courts-----
PTD 2017
M.A. (Stay) No. 127/LB and S.T.A. No. 78/LB of 2015, decided on 31st January, 2015.

2017 P T D (Trib

Messrs K.B. ENTERPRISES, FAISALABAD Versus CIR (APPEALS), RTO., FAISALABAD

Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal
SCMR 2014
Decided on 23rd October, 2013.

2014 S C M R 258

WOODLAND — Appellant Versus ESSEX COUNTY COUNCIL — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of UK*
PTD 1968
Writ Petitions Nos. 215 and 224 of 1959, decided on 3rd April 1962.

1968 P T D 215

M. CT. MUTHIAH AND ANOTHER Versus DEPUTY CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY, SOUTHERN ZONE, MADRAS

Court: Madras (India)