Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Remedial legislation meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Remedial legislation

Remedial legislation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2017 PLC(CS) 62 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Remedial legislation

Purpose and meaning.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Remedial legislation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124958676

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Remedial legislation"

PTD 2004
M. As. Nos.528/LB to 531/LB of 2003, decided on 23rd September, 2003.

2004 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income‑tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 2001
C. T. R. No .360 of 1991, decided on 11th December, 2000.

2001 P T D 814

C.I.T., CENTRAL ZONE, LAHORE Versus NATIONAL SECURITY INSURANCE CO. LTD., LAHORE

Court: Lahore High Court
PLC 1981
Miscellaneous Application No. 5 of 1978, decided on 7th June, 1980.

1981 P L C 73

SIND EMPLOYEES SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION Versus MESSRS AL‑MOHAMMADI TILES INDUSTRY

Court: Karachi High Court
PTD 2008
N/A

2008 P T D 1715

Messrs AL-HABIB FLOUR MILLS Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MEDIUM TAXD4YERS UNIT, RAWALPINDI

Court: Lahore High Court
PLC(CS) 2017
Writ Petitions Nos.2905 of 2009 2941, 2967, 2968, 3016, 3025, 3053, 3189, 3251, 3292 of 2009, 496, 556, 664 1256, 1662, 1685, 1696, 2176, 2230, 2501, 2696, 2728 of 2010 and 206, 355, 435 and 877 of 2011, decided on 26th January, 2015.

2017 P L C (C

ATTA ULLAH and 12 others Versus CHIEF SECRETARY, KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA and others

Court: Peshawar High Court
PLC 1996
Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2 of 1995, decided on 27th August, 1995.

1996 P L C 724

MUNDA APPAREL (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI through Chief Executive Versus COMMISSIONER, SINDH EMPLOYEES SOCIAL SECURITY

Court: Karachi High Court
PTD 2016
Tax Reference No.46 of 2010, decided on 23rd June, 2015.

2016 P T D 325

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE Versus SHER AKBAR KHAN

Court: Peshawar High Court
PTD 2021
N/A

2021 P T D 1

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE Versus Messrs THREE STAR RICE FACTORY

Court: Lahore High Court (Bahawalpur Bench)
PLD 2003
merits because of the change of law viz. repeal of Defence Housing Authority Lahore Ordinance, 1999 on the promulgation of Defence Housing Authority Lahore Order, 2002-- Validity---Object of Art.25(f) of the Defence Housing Authority Lahore Order, 2002, which was curative in sense and remedial in nature providing a forum, was to provide remedy to the aggrieved persons before the Executive Board and it would not be just and fair if the petitioner was deprived of the remedy---Irrationality, unreasonableness or dis proportionality resulting in injustice being a ground for judicial review, even though the case of petitioner may not be strictly falling within the ambit of Art.25(f) of the Order, High Court, had ample power and jurisdiction to relieve a party from oppression and to rectify a manifest injustice by adopting purposive approach---High Court could even remit/remand the matter in conflict to an Authority/Functionary to hear and redress the grievance of a party---Order passed by the Secretary, Cooperative of the Province rejecting the revision of the petitioner was declared by the High Court as of no legal effect, as a consequence whereof, the revision petition filed by the petitioner shall be deemed pending, which shall stand transferred to the Executive Board and shall be heard and decided in accordance with law

P L D 2003 Lahore 741

Dr. FOZIA AMBER — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLC(CS) 2015
Writ Petition No.3785 of 2015, decided on 15th April, 2015.

2015 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD HUZAIR QURESHI Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary S&GAD, Lahore and another

Court: Lahore High Court

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library