Microfinance institutions
Microfinance institutions legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Petitioner/accused was aggrieved of order passed by Ex-officio Justice of Peace directing registration of FIR against him for issuing a cheque which was dishonored on presentation
Plea raised by petitioner/accused was that provision of S. 489-F, P.P.C. was not applicable
Validity
Purpose and aim of establishment of microfinance institution was to support persons with meagre means of subsistence
No criminal proceedings against such customer for whose alleviation such bank was established was intended by Microfinance Institutions Ordinance, 2001
If a person who was poor and socially not well placed committed a crime envisaged in S. 489-F, P.P.C., and was not punished for the reason that the provision was inapplicable, this would tantamount to giving a carte blanche to the poor to commit such crime
Microfinance institutions cannot be termed as financial institutions within the contemplation of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001, to say that its matters can only be tried by Banking Court
Provisions of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 were fully applicable and application filed under Ss. 22-A & 22-B, Cr.P.C. on behalf of complainant/microfinance bank was fully competent
High Court declined to interfere in the order passed by Ex-officio Justice of Peace
Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances.
Petitioners were customers of Microfinance Institutions and they apprehended coercive measures to be adopted for recovery of finance
Validity
Microfinance Institutions were not deemed to be banking companies
Recoveries of loans could not be obtained under Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001, by Microfinance Institutions through Banking Courts
High Court declined to issue directions merely on the basis of apprehensions and presumptions of parties
Microfinance Institutions stated that recoveries would be made through summary suit under O. XXXVII, C.P.C. and they were not harassing petitioners rather they would adopt proper procedure prescribed under the law
Constitutional petition being not maintainable was dismissed.
Contention of defendant, inter alia, was that a summary suit under O. XXXVII, C.P.C. filed by a microfinance institution was not maintainable and a suit under Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 should have been filed instead
Validity
Bare perusal of S. 3(2) of the Microfinance Institutions Ordinance, 2001 clearly reflected that Banking Companies Ordinance, 1962 and any other law for the time being in force relating to banking companies or financial institutions shall not apply to microfinance institutions licensed under the Microfinance Institutions Ordinance, 2001 and that microfinance institutions shall not be deemed to be a banking companies for purpose of any law for the time being in force relating to banking companies
Impugned order was therefore, rightly passed
Appeal was dismissed, in circumstances.
"Microfinance institutions", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124963803
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Microfinance institutions"
2022 C L D 894
PAKISTAN MICROFINANCE BANK LIMITED through Authorized Representative and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Interior and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh2018 C L D 1196
MUHAMMAD TUSEEF and 4 others — Petitioners Versus STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN and 30 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore (Bahawalpur Bench)2023 C L D 1536
SHOUKAT ALI — Petitioner Versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2026 C L D 303
SAFEER HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus CAPITAL CITY POLICE OFFICER, LAHORE and 4 others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2026 Lahore 69
SAFEER HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus CAPITAL CITY POLICE OFFICER, LAHORE and 4 others — Respondents
Court: High Court2018 C L D 116
Syed ITRAT HUSSAIN RIZVI — Appellant Versus Messrs TAMEER MICRO FINANCE BANK LIMITED through Attorney and another — Respondents
Court: Sindh2023 C L D 1148
TELENOR MICROFINANCE BANK LIMITED — Petitioner Versus SHAMIM BANO and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2023 S C M R 1560
TELENOR MICROFINANCE BANK LIMITED — Petitioner Versus SHAMIM BANO and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2020 C L D 359
TELENOR MICRO FINANCE BANK LIMITED through Authorized Person — Applicant Versus The STATE and 3 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh (Hyderabad Bench)2021 C L D 1147
SHARE HOLDERS OF KARAKURAM CO-OPERATIVE BANK (KCBL) and others — Petitioners Versus KARAKURAM CO-OPERATIVE BANK through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan as Ex-Officio Chairman KCBL and others — Respondents
Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court