Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Lawful meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Lawful

Lawful legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1989 PLD 404 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Words "law", "lawful" and "lawful authority"

Import and connotation.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Lawful", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13207

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Lawful"

SCMR 2018
Constitutional Petition No. 134 of 2012 and Civil Misc. Application No.1864 of 2010 in Constitutional Petition No. 9 of 2005 and Civil Misc. Applications Nos. 1939 of 2014, 5959 of 2016, 4095, 1793, 2876, 2996, 3014 and 6672 of 2018 in Constitutional Petition No. 134 of 2012 and Civil Misc. Applications Nos. 3034, 3048, 3051 and 6247 of 2018 in Civil Misc. Application No. 1864 of 2010, decided on 31st August, 2018.

2018 S C M R 1891

PAKISTAN BAR COUNCIL through Chairman and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERAL GOVERNMENT through Establishment Division and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2019
Constitutional Petition No. 134 of 2012, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 1864 of 2010 in Constitutional Petition No. 9 of 2005, Civil Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 1939 of 2014, 5959 of 2016, 4095, 1793, 2876, 2996, 3014 and 6672 of 2018 in Constitutional Petition No.134 of 2012 and Civil Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 3034, 3048, 3051 and 6247 of 2018 in Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 1864 of 2010, decided on 31st August, 2018.

2019 S C M R 389

PAKISTAN BAR COUNCIL through Chairman and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERAL GOVERNMENT through Establishment Division and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1961
Writ Petition No. 265 of 1961. Reference answered on 26th September 1961.

P L D 1961 (W

GULAB DIN‑Petitioner Versus MAJOR A. T. SHAUKAT AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: (d) Martial Law‑Only "Martial Law Authorities" not subject to writ jurisdiction of High Court‑Orders of other members of 9' Armed Forces not Immune to scrutiny by Court‑Laws (Continuance in Force) Order (I of 1958), Art. 2 (5)‑That High Court orders might possibly be ignored not a relevant consideration in taking decisions permissible under law‑Zahid Umar & Company v. Chief Secretary, West Pakistan P L D 1959 Lah. 764 ref:
PLD 1981
Shariat Appeal No. 2‑P of 1980, decided on 20th January 1981.

P L D 1981 Supreme Court 120

[Shariat Bench] Versus Mst. FARISHTA‑Respondent

Court: Shariat Bench
PLD 1969
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2952 of 1969, decided on 30th June 1969.

P L D 1969 Lahore 786

Malik MIR HASSAN AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: (c) Martial Law Regulation (1969) C. M. L. A.'s No. 42 read with Proclamation of Martial Law, 1969, para. S and Provisional Constitution order, 1969, Art. 6, cl. (2)‑High Court's jurisd4ction to entertain petitions under S. 561‑A, Cr. P. C.‑Intact ---Power or jurisdiction of High Court‑Neither whittled down nor curbed by Regulation No. 42.
PLD 1978
Writ Petition No. 1386 of 1978, decided on 4th April 1978.

P L D 1978 Lahore 766

MAPAL KHAN-Petitioner Versus MARTIAL LAW ADMINISTRATOR. ZONE "A", LAHORE AND 3 OTHERS-Respondents.

Court: (a) Martial Law Order (C. M. L. A.'s) 3 of 1977-
PLD 1978
9th March 1978

P L D 1978 Quetta 177

KHUDIADAD-Petitioner Versus DEPUTY MARTIAL LAW ADMINISTRATOR, ZONE `D',

Court: (a) Laws (Continuance in Force) Order C. M. L. A.'s Order No. 1 of 1977
PLD 1960
Criminal Appeals Nos. 1 and 2 of 1960, decided on 19th April 1960.

P L D 1960 Supreme Court (Pak

MUHAMMAD AYUB KHUHRO-Appellant Versus PAKISTAN, THROUGH THE MINISTRY OF INTERIOR GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN AND TWO OTHERS

Court: (c) Laws (Continuance in Force) Order (I of 1958), Art. 3 (if) read with Art. 2-Court cannot declare a Martial Law Regulation or Martial Law Order invalid or ultra vires-Questioning an order made under a Martial Law Order-Whether or not amounts to questioning Martial Law Order itself-Chowdhury Manzur Elahi v. The State P L D 1959 Lah. 243 not approved.
PLD 1959
Criminal Appeal No. 25 of 1958, decided on 19th March 1959.

P L D 1959 Baghdad﷓ ul﷓Jadid 7

ALLAH DIWAYA‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1993
C. P. No.D‑529 of 1990, heard on 9th September, 1992.

P L D 1993 Karachi 93

Messrs NAJIB ZARAB LIMITED‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through the Secretary

Court:

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library