Home Maxims & Terms Judicial Discretion meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Judicial Discretion

Judicial Discretion legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2018 YLR 1436 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Exercise ofJudicial discretionScope

Exercise of judicial power would inevitably take care of the evil consequences which would likely to flow out of its intemperate use

Every kind of judicial discretion would be used with due care and caution

Awareness of the context in which discretion was required to be exercised and of the reasonably foreseeable consequences of its use was the hall mark of a prudent exercise of judicial discretion.

2000 PLC(CS) 684 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Discretion of Judge"ConnotationJudicial discretion

Discretion of a Judge is the law of tyrants; it is always unknown, it is different in different men; it is casual, and depends on constitution, temper and passion and at the best it is often caprice and in the worst it is every vice, folly and passion to which human nature can be liable.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Judicial Discretion", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13937

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Judicial Discretion"

PLD 1978
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1722/B of 1978, decided on 12th July 1978.

P L D 1978 Lahore 1273

MUHAMMAD SHARIF-Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AMIN DAR-Respondent

Court: -- S. 497(5)-Bail-Cancellation of-Mere lapse of time in filing petition for cancellation of bail-Held, would be of no consequence- Order granting bail lacking exercise of judicial discretion-Cannot be allowed to stand because of time factor.-Delay.
SCMR 1986
Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 209/P of 1985, decided on 8th October, 1985.

1986 S C M R 134

ATTA MUHAMMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: High Court
SCMR 1986
Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 407 of 1985, decided on 19th October, 1985.

1986 S C M R 169

MUSHTAQ and others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: High Court
SCMR 1985
Civil Petition No. 354‑R of 1984, decided on 17th March, 1985.

1985 S C M R 1034

LEHRASAB KHAN‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. AQIL‑UN‑NISA‑‑Respondent

Court: High Court
SCMR 1990
Criminal Petition No. 257 of 1987, decided on 11th April, 1989.

1990 S C M R 292

GHULAM MUSTAFA‑‑Petitioner Versus AKBAR KHAN and another‑‑Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1963
Civil Revision No. 615 of 1961, decided on14th June 1961.

P L D 1963 Dacca 87

ALOKESHI BANIK‑ — Petitioner Versus AFTABUDDIN — ‑Opposite‑Party

Court: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. VI, r. 17 & S. 115 Amendment in plaint changing character of plaint though not of suit‑Not allowable‑Decision to allow amendment governed by judicial discretion‑--Arbitrary discretion---‑Interference by High Court‑Plaintiff praying for addition of name of defendants agent in suit relating to sale.
CLC 1980
Civil Revision No. 73 of 1975, decided on 23rd January, 1980.

1980 C L C 1446

MIR AFZAL AND 6 OTHERS-Petitioners Versus SAMIUR REHMAN AND 34 OTHERS-Respondents

Court: Peshawar
CLC 1987
Writ Petition No. 4845 of 1984, decided on 21st April, 1987

1987 C L C 1508

NAZIR AHMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus DISTRICT JUDGE, SARGODHA and 4 others‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLR 2002
N/A

2002 Y L R 1664

Mst. SUGHRAN BIBI‑‑‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD YUNUS and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1987
Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No.2 of 1987, decided on 10th January, 1987.

1987 S C M R 853

MUHAMMAD AKBAR VIRK‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: High Court