1986 PLP 169 (SCMR)
MUSHTAQ and others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1986 PLP 169 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain, Actg. C.J., Abdul Kadir Shaikh and S.A. Nusrat, JJ |
| Parties | MUSHTAQ and others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 169 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 169 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Actg. C.J., Abdul Kadir Shaikh and S.A. Nusrat, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 169 (SCMR) (MUSHTAQ and others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- S.M. K. Lodhi, Advocate Supreme Court with Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Date of hearing: 19th October, 1985.
Headnotes / Summary
(Against the order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 2‑10‑1985 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous 1901/B of 1985. ‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) S. 497‑‑Petition for Leave to Appeal‑‑Bail‑‑Bail application of accused dismissed by High Court in exercise of its judicial discretion‑‑No good ground, however, made out for interference‑‑Leave refused. Nemo for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) S. 497‑‑Petition for Leave to Appeal‑‑Bail‑‑Bail application of accused dismissed by High Court in exercise of its judicial discretion‑‑No good ground, however, made out for interference‑‑Leave refused. S.M. K. Lodhi, Advocate Supreme Court with Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners. Nemo for the State. Date of hearing: 19th October, 1985. ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, ACTG. C.J.‑‑The petitioners seek leave to appeal against the order of the High Court, dated 23‑9‑1985, dismissing their bail application.
2. We have heard the petitioners' counsel and gone through the impugned order. No good ground has been made out for interference with the judicial discretion exercised by the High Court. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. M. Y. H. Petition dismissed.