Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Directory Enactment meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Directory Enactment

Directory Enactment legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

Definition not found in search database.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Directory Enactment", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13959

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Directory Enactment"

PLD 1956
Civil Appeal No. 294 of 1955, decided on 2nd December 1955.

P L D 1956 Supreme Court (Ind

PRATAP SINGH‑Appellant Versus Shri KRISHNA GUPTA and others‑Respondents

Court:
CLC 1987
Miscellaneous Application No.2 of 1986, decided on 7th September, 1986.

1987 C L C 726

Haji ABDUL JABBAR and others‑‑Petitioners Versus HARYANA ASBESTOS CEMENT

Court: Quetta
YLR 1999
N/A

1999 Y L R 1

ABDUL MAJEED ANJUM and 3 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BAHAWALPUR DIVISION, BAHAWALPUR through Chairman and 8 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 1990
Criminal Revision No. 71 of 1989, heard on 16th April, 1990.

1990 M L D 2084

NAZIR AHMAD and others‑‑Applicants Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
CLCN 2017
2017-January-24

2017 C L C Note 131

Dr. SAJJAD NAZIR — Petitioner Versus SPECIAL JUDGE RENT TRIBUNAL, LAHORE and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1963
Second Appeal No. 367 of 1959, decided on 17th August 1961

P L D 1963 Dacca 318

MAFIZULLAH — ‑Appellant Versus MANAI ULLAH AND OTHERS — ‑Respondents

Court: (a) Sylhet Tenancy Act (XI of 1936), S. 65 (d) and Sylhet Tenancy Rules, r. 2‑Holding over as under‑raiyats after expiry of written lease covered by S. 65 (2)‑Ejectment notice terminating tenancy turns occupants into trespassers‑Service of notice under r. 2 by post‑Provisions being directory, service is valid and sufficient. Tara Das Mulakar v. Ram Doyal 2 C W N 125 distinguished.
PTD 2019
N/A

2019 P T D 1890

Messrs STRONGMAN IDEAL FURNITURE Versus The CHIEF COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE and others

Court: Lahore High Court
PLD 1965
19‑3‑1965 in the space of one hour or so with the same result, namely, that in all the seven cases the contesting respondents were unseated and the petitioners were declared elected, although in some such cases, e.g., Ahmad Din v. Muhammad Akram the prayer was only for setting aside the election as a whole. Further that the findings recorded by respondent No. 1 are capricious and fanciful, unrelated to the facts placed before him. Lastly, in none of these cases election as a whole was set aside in which case fresh election should have been ordered. All those who were unseated were staunch supporters of Ch. Zahur Elahi and those who were declared elected by respondent No. 1 belonged to the rival political group. They were issued identity cards there and then, the plan purpose being to enable them to participate in elections to the National Assembly two days later, and to vote for Ch. Ghulam Rasul Tarar, the Muslim League candidate on 21‑3‑1965 and to demonstrate to all those who dare support Ch. Zabur Elahi that they would risk losing their own membership of the Electoral College. It was urged that these circumstances taken together could reasonably sustain an inference of mala fide nature of the proceedings in each case before respondent No. 1 as Tribunal

P L D 1965 (W

MUHAMMAD AKRAM‑Petitioner Versus CAPT. C. A. SAEED, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND ELECTION TRIBUNAL,

Court: High Court
SCMR 2001
Civil Appeal No.295 of 1995, decided on 8th December, 2000.

2001 S C M R1001

GHULAM HASSAN — Appellant Versus JAMSHAID ALI and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1962
Writ Petition No. 74 of 1961, decided on 20th April 1962.

P L D 1962 (W

ZEBUN VISA KURESHY-Petitioner Versus CHIEF SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COM

Court: (a) Displaced -Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958), S. 2 (6) proviso second-Persons deemed to be in "possession"-Conditions to be fulfilled for taking advantage of proviso-Allottee for whose benefit no ejectment proceedings had -been ordered by Rehabilitation Authority-Does not fall within scope of concession of proviso second-Notification No. F. 3 (3)/ 60/SI, published in Gazette of Pakistan dated 11th August, 1960 and reproduced in Manual of Settlement, p. 163-Word "and" occurring after "Authority" in the first line of Settlement Manual at page 164-Cannot be read as "or".

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library