Karachi Port Trust Manual
Karachi Port Trust Manual legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Import of goods by Afghan national was ordered to be detained and then seized by Customs Authorities of Pakistan on the ground of non-production of Letter of Credit by the importer
Validity
Transit Agreement and Annexure thereto. did not require tlfe\production of Letter of Credit for clearance of transit goods by the Customs Authorities but the only documents required to be produced at-the time of arrival -of goods was the invoice
Afghanistan being a land-locked country, goods imported by Afghan Nationals from other countries for use or consumption in Afghanistan could not be said to have been imported into Pakistan merely because goods crossed the customs barrier and entered into Pakistan, though to be transited to their designation viz. Afghanistan
Said goods, in fact, are goods in transit to be dealt with and transhiped to Afghanistan in accordance with the Pakistan Afghanistan Transit Trade Agreement, 1965 and Protocol appended thereto
Customs law relating to the importation of goods would not, therefore, be applicable to such goods
Alleged smuggling of the goods into Pakistan could not furnish any valid interpretation to the Authorities to unilaterally take away the facility of transit or to impose any restriction on the duty free import itself which was guaranteed by the Afghan Transit Trade Agreement
Goods having been illegally and wrongfully detained and not allowed to be transited to Afghanistan, direction by High Court to Collector of Customs to issue delay/detention certificate was quite just and fair
Central Board of Revenue and/or the Collector of Customs thus could not ban/disallow import of goods by Afghan nationals under the Afghan Transit Trade Agreement, 1965 during the subsistence of the said Agreement.
Paras. 1.3 & 1.4 read with Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969). Ss. 2 (xxviii) & 25-A-Railway employee-Permanent Way Inspector-Performing supervisory duties and basic pay more than Rs. 800 p. m. Covered by, Exception (b) of S. 2 (xxviii) of Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969-Not a workman Not within jurisdiction of Labour Court.
"Lay days" for determining demurrage commence from time ship arrives at outer anchorage and not from time she gets berthed-Charter-party merely naming port without anything further-Vessel deemed' "arrived ship" on mere entrance at outer anchorage-Charter-party containing clause "time lost in waiting for berth to count as loading time"-Clause, a special term Persons other than those parties to charter-party-Cannot be made liable unless bound by independent contract containing clear term that party was so bound-Ship at Karachi Port-Cannot be loaded or unloaded except at the berth-Karachi Port Trust Manual, Rule 12.
"Karachi Port Trust Manual", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13989
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Karachi Port Trust Manual"
1981 C L C 1451
PAKISTAN SHIPPING LINES LTD.‑‑Plaintiff Versus TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF KARACHI AND 2 OTHERS — ‑Defendants
Court: Karachi1986 S C M R 56
TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF KARACHI and others‑‑Petitioners Versus Messrs ZAMIR LIMITED and others‑‑Respondents
Court: High Court2010 C L C 1666
TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF KARACHI — Plaintiff Versus KARACHI INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER TERMINAL LIMITED, (K.I.C.T.) — Defendant
Court: KarachiP L D 1965 (W
NAQI HANNA KHABBAZ AND OTHERS‑Appellants Versus MESSRS DALMIA CEMENT LTD.‑Respondents
Court:1990 M L D 797
H. SHEIKH NOOR‑UD‑DIN & SONS LTD. through its Director‑‑Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL SECRETARY, CUSTOMS (JUDICIAL), CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE and 5 others Respondents
Court: Karachi1996SCMR727
Islamabad and 5 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus JAMALUDDIN and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1988 S C M R 922
(A REGISTERED TRADE UNION), KARACHI‑‑Appellant Versus KARACHI PORT TRUST, KARACHI and 2 others‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑S.2(xxviii)‑‑Industrial Disputes Ordinance (LVI of 1959), Ss.2(n) & 5(5)‑‑West Pakistan Industrial Disputes Ordinance (IV of 1968), S.2(4)‑‑"Worker" and "workman"‑‑Definition of‑‑Chowkidars and Havildars, whether workmen‑‑Industrial dispute concerning Chowkidars and Havildars of Karachi Port Trust‑‑Jurisdiction of Industrial Court to adjudicate upon‑‑Industrial Court refusing to take up industrial dispute referred by Karachi Port Trust Workers Union on behalf of Chowkidars‑ and Havildars on ground that they were not workmen‑ Order challenged in Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court holding that finding of Industrial Court that members of Watch and Ward Department of Karachi Port Trust did not fall within definition of Workman amounted to saying that they had no locus standi for the relief sought by them and that it was thus not a case of refusal on its part to exercise jurisdiction to warrant interference by High Court‑‑Contention raised that Industrial Tribunal had erred in adopting a definition of workman as used in Ordinance (LVI of 1959) which was wholly against its letter and spirit and High Court, in not correcting this patent illegality, had declined to exercise its Constitutional jurisdiction‑‑Held, Chowkidars and Havildars doing manual work, were included in definition of workman and that legislative intention was manifest from definitions given in subsequent legislation which have resolved all doubts on the point‑‑"Workmen" cover all employees of an industrial establishment, whatever the nature of their duties, and include employees who have been discharged in connection with an industrial dispute or whose discharge has led to that dispute‑ Appeal accepted and case remanded for disposal on merits, accepting status of Chowkidars and Havildars as workmen in establishment of Karachi Port Trust.‑‑Words and phrases.1992 S C M R 2166
PAKISTAN ENGINEERING CO. LIMITED, LAHORE through Managing Director‑‑‑Appellant Versus FAZAL BEG and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1994 S C M R 1866
Messrs SAHAF CORPORATION (PVT.) ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus KARACHI PORT TRUST and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1977 SCMR 247
SHAHZAR KHAN‑Appellant Versus SIND LABOUR COURT No. 4, KARACHI AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: ----Art. 185 (3)‑Appeal to Supreme Court‑Appellant workman categorically admitting allegations against him and praying to be excused‑Lower Courts though not considering case on merits and case as such demanding remand, yet remand, in view of admission of guilt by appellant, neither called for nor in interest of justice Junior Labour Court finding inquiry fair and impartial and such finding not set aside by lower Court, no reasonable ground to interfere with such finding and appeal, held, liable to dismissal ‑Industrial disputes.