Home Maxims & Terms Pay-scale meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Pay-scale

Pay-scale legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1984 SCMR 642 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Art. 212(3)-Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), S. 4Civil Services-Pay Scale-Manifestly unjust treatment set right by Tribunal by equating respondents on matter of pay scale and status with those holding identical posts/pay scales in Agriculture Department - Held, in granting such relief Tribunal did not exceed its jurisdiction nor does any question of law of public importance arise such as might require further examination by Supreme Court-Leave to appeal refused.

1982 SCMR 515 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Art. 212(3) and M. L. R. 118 of 1972-Pay scale-Record showing petitioner employed as Steno-typist but treated as Junior Clerk and given N. P. S. 6 as against his claim to be Head Clerk-Counsel for Government not in a position to controvert such facts-Petition converted into appeal and appeal accepted with direction that petitioner shall be given N. P. S. 8 applicable to Steno-typists.-[Civil services].

1981 PLC(CS) 869 SERVICE-TRIBUNAL-PUNJAB Judicial Precedent
Pay-scale

Secretariat pay-scale made admissible to officials of Board of Revenue working since before 13th October, 1955 and also on promotion to higher grade provided promotion was in regular line-Steno-typist posted in clerical line as senior clerk and Assistant without his option and sent back to his line on his option-Held, would be entitled to Secretariat pay scale on promotion as stenographer, and Personal Assistant and would not be entitled to Secretariat pay scale for period he worked in clerical cadre.

1973 PLD 167 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Pay-scale Pay-scale - Facts that employees in other comparable concerns getting more pay-Not by itself sufficient for increasing pay-scale-Financial condition of concerns far from satisfactory-Demand for Increase in pay-scale rejected.

1970 PLC 186 WEST-PAKISTAN-INDUSTRIAL-APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL Judicial Precedent
Pay-scale

Demand for, increase in-Fact that others also get same pay-Not a fair and reasonable ground for Increase in pay of particular class of workmen-Challandars (P. W. R.) promoted by selection as Store Distributors-Held, not entitled to pay-scale allowed to Store Distributors.

1967 PLD 513 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Pay-scale-Construction of document providing for pay scales

Pay-scales amended by agreement-Amendment to be construed by placing it side by side with scales of which it is at, amendment-New scales silent on how to adjust salaries of existing employees in such scales-Provision for such adjustment in ok scales to operate.

1963 PLC 1110 Judicial Precedent

Pay-scale Pay-scale - Dearness allowance - Remedy for increase in prices of essential commodities-Pay-scales-Not to be interfered with at short intervals.

1963 PLC 743 Judicial Precedent

Pay-scale Pay-scale - No demand for introduction - Demand for annual increment not granted.

1963 PLC 153 Judicial Precedent

Pay-scale Pay-scale-Salary, combination of monthly pay and dearness allowance-Fixation of sliding scales.

1963 PLC 975 Judicial Precedent

Pay-scale Pay-scales-New scale not to be enforced in regard to old employees without their consent.

1962 PLC 1023 Judicial Precedent

Pay-scale Pay-scale-Formula for adjusting basic pay of Grade II employees in new Grade I-Based on pattern of Sastri Award.

1962 PLC 888 Judicial Precedent

Pay-scale Pay-Scale-Revision of wage scales-Wages paid in other concerns in same industry-Not the only criterion.

1962 PLC 902 Judicial Precedent

Pay-scale Pay-scale-Disparity in, between identical categories of td workers on harbour side andettY side-Removed.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Pay-scale", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14133

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Pay-scale"

PLC 1992
Appeal No. SUK-238 of 1991, decided on 28th September, 1991.

1992 P L C 276

BADSHAH KHAN Versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING AND WATER MANAGEMENT, SINDH, HYDERABAD and 3 others

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh
PLC(CS) 2003
Civil Appeal No. 1258 of 1996, decided on 3rd October, 2002.

2003 P L C (C

Malik SHAUKAT HAYAT Versus WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, through Chairman, Lahore and others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 1992
Appeal No. 309 of 1990, decided on 29th.Apri1,1991.

1992 P L C (C

S. MUBASHIR HUSSAIN Versus ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB

Court: High Court
SCMR 2003
Civil Appeal.No.1258 of 1996, decided on 3rd October, 2002.

2003 S C M R 347

Malik SHAUKAT, HAYAT ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, through Chairman, Lahore and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 1984
Writ Petition No. 3533 of 1982, decided on 4th June, 1984.

1984 P L C (C

K. M. KHALID TOOR Versus CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, AUQAF AND OTHERS

Court: Lahore High Court
PLC(CS) 1983
Case No. 648/1486 of 1981, decided on 4th December, 1982.

1983 P L C (C

MAMOON‑UR‑RASHID Versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, EDUCATION

Court: Service Tribunal Punjab
PLD 1983
Civil Appeal No. 62 of 1979, decided on 24th May, 1983.

P L D 1983 Supreme Court 431

Appellant Versus N: W. F. P. THROUGH COLLECTOR, D. I. KHAN AND OTHERS-

Court:
SCMR 1977
Civil Appeals Nos. K‑97 to K‑108 of 1976, decided on 6th June 1977.

1977 S C M R 403

T. I. P. LTD., KARACHI‑Appellant Versus FIRST SIND LABOUR COURT AND OTHERS‑ Respondents

Court: -‑ S. 15 read with Government of Pakistan, Ministry of Finance memo. No. 1(2)‑NC‑TMP/71 dated8‑3‑1972 ‑ National Pay Scales‑ Government rules and instructions regarding introduction of National Pay Scales‑Not applicable to employees of private limited com panies‑Wages of such company employees‑To be fixed on basis of agreements between employees and employer‑Employees of such companies‑Not entitled to ad hoc relief as of right‑Relief in nature of ad hoc relief, however, already given under an agreement‑Employees, held, bound by such agreement.‑Industrial dispute.
SCMR 2011
Civil Petitions Nos. 1158 and 1159 of 2009, decided on 28th September, 2010.

2011 SCMR 336

FINANCE DIVISION through Secretary and others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM and another — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 2011
Civil Petitions Nos.1158 and 1159 of 2009, decided on 28th September, 2009.

2011 P L C (C

FINANCE DIVISION through Secretary and others Versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM and another

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan