Home Maxims & Terms Personal Right meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Personal Right

Personal Right legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2020 CLC 1942 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent
Art.199Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court"Aggrieved person"Personal rightLocus standiPublic procurementScope

Petitioner sought cancellation of tender for installation of water-supply on lands allegedly belonging to petitioner and his forefathers

Validity

Petitioner was neither owner of said land nor his name was mentioned in mutation entries and he had no concern with the same; and therefore he did not fall within definition of "aggrieved person" in context of Art.199 of Constitution

Sine qua non for initiation of proceedings under Art. 199 of Constitution was that petitioner should have locus standi

Constitutional petition being not maintainable, was dismissed, in circumstances.

1993 SCMR 1451 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Personal Right

If there is conflict between a personal right and environment, the personal right must yield in favour of environment.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Personal Right", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14276

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Personal Right"

MLD 1990
Civil Revision No.1802 of 1986, decided on 17th June, 1987.

1990 M L D 823

Mian ABDUL WAHEED‑‑Petitioner Versus Khawaja MUHAMMAD SAEED and another‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2024
2023-November-13

P L D 2024 Islamabad 227

MOHAMMAD ALI TARIQ — Appellant Versus THAI AIRWAYS INTERNATIONAL through CEO/Manager and 3 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1979
Constitutional Petition No. 203 of 1976, decided on 3rd October 1978.

P L D 1979 Karachi 473

SIND ALKALIS LTD., KARACHI-Petitioner Versus WORKERS' UNION AND ANOTHER-Respondents

Court: - Ss. 25-A & 34-Interpretation that right secured to workers can also be enforced by taking recourse to S. 34-Held, not permissible as it would result in reading subsections (2), (3) & (4) of S. 25-A nugatory and allow workers to bypass procedure and period of limitation laid down therein-Remedies provided under Ss. 34 & 25-A independently enure respectively to benefit of Unions and workers for enforcement of their personal rights.-Interpretation of statutes-Industrial dispute.
CLC 2009
2008-November-26

2009 C L C 413

GHAZANFAR ALLY EFFENDI and 3 others — Plaintiffs Versus ARIF EFFENDI through L.Rs. and others — Defendants

Court: Karachi
PLD 1997
Writ Petition No.3347‑HR of 1996, decided on 2nd April, 1997.

P L D 1997 Lahore 666

Mst. SAJIDA BIBI and another ‑‑‑Petitioners Versus INCHARGE, CHOUKI N0.2,

Court: ‑‑‑‑Art. 9‑‑‑Security of person‑‑‑Word "life" occurring in Art. 9 of the Constitution does not only mean vegetative or animal life, but includes such amenities, facilities and personal rights as should be enjoyed by a person born in a free country.‑‑Words and phrases.
MLD 2002
Suit No.855 and Civil Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 4915, 5491, 5567, 6198 and 6199 of 2001, decided on 13th September, 2001.

2002 M L D 908

Syed ARIF ALI ‑‑‑Plaintiff Versus Syed FIRDOUS ALI and others‑‑‑Defendants

Court: Karachi
PLD 2010
technicalities---Where petition under S.491, Cr.P.C. is not found to be competent due to absence of element of illegal custody by the father of his own child, High Court can also pass an appropriate order in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction

P L D 2010 Karachi 119

NATASHA RASHID — Petitioner Versus RASHID ZAR and 4 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1982
THE GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS‑Respondents Civil Appeals Nos. 128 and 129 of 1978, decided on 7th April, 1982.

P L D 1982 Supreme Court 367

Civil Appeal No. 128/78 Versus Brig. ‑HIS HIGHNESS NAWAB MUHAMMAD ABBAS KHAN ABBASI AND others‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑ Position of Ruler and regulation of succession to Gaddi and of property of state.‑Bahawalpur State.
SCMR 1993
C.P.LA. No. 33‑K of 1993, decided on 21st March, 1993.

1993 S C M R 1451

KARACHI BUILDING CONTROL AUTHORITY and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus SALEEM AKHTAR RAJPUT and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1959
Civil Suits No. 503, 557, 558 and 559 of 1954 and 154 of 1955, decided on 15th February 1959.

P L D 1959 (W

QUEENSLAND INSURANCE CO. LTD.‑Plaintiff Versus THE PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES -Defendant

Court: