P L D 1979 Karachi 473 (PLP)
SIND ALKALIS LTD., KARACHI-Petitioner Versus WORKERS' UNION AND ANOTHER-Respondents
| Citation | P L D 1979 Karachi 473 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | - Ss. 25-A & 34-Interpretation that right secured to workers can also be enforced by taking recourse to S. 34-Held, not permissible as it would result in reading subsections (2), (3) & (4) of S. 25-A nugatory and allow workers to bypass procedure and period of limitation laid down therein-Remedies provided under Ss. 34 & 25-A independently enure respectively to benefit of Unions and workers for enforcement of their personal rights.-Interpretation of statutes-Industrial dispute. |
| Bench Members | S. A. Nusrat, J |
| Parties | SIND ALKALIS LTD., KARACHI-Petitioner Versus WORKERS' UNION AND ANOTHER-Respondents |
| Primary Law | Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1979 Karachi 473 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1979 Karachi 473 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the - Ss. 25-A & 34-Interpretation that right secured to workers can also be enforced by taking recourse to S. 34-Held, not permissible as it would result in reading subsections (2), (3) & (4) of S. 25-A nugatory and allow workers to bypass procedure and period of limitation laid down therein-Remedies provided under Ss. 34 & 25-A independently enure respectively to benefit of Unions and workers for enforcement of their personal rights.-Interpretation of statutes-Industrial dispute. bench comprising: S. A. Nusrat, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1979 Karachi 473 (PLP) (SIND ALKALIS LTD., KARACHI-Petitioner Versus WORKERS' UNION AND ANOTHER-Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M. A. Ghani for Petitioner.
- Ali Amjad for Respondent No. 1.
- Nemo for Respondent No. 2.
- Date of hearing : 23rd August 1978.
Headnotes / Summary
Ss. 25-A & 34-Interpretation that right secured to workers can also be enforced by taking recourse to S. 34-Held, not permissible as it would result in reading subsections (2), (3) & (4) of S. 25-A nugatory and allow workers to bypass procedure and period of limitation laid down therein-Remedies provided under Ss. 34 & 25-A independently enure respectively to benefit of Unions and workers for enforcement of their personal rights.-[Interpretation of statutes-Industrial dispute].
Judgment & Decree
Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑ ‑ Ss. 25‑A & 34‑Interpretation that right secured to workers can also be enforced by taking recourse to S. 34‑Held, not permissible as it would result in reading subsections (2), (3) & (4) of S. 25‑A nugatory and allow workers to bypass procedure and period of limitation laid down therein‑Remedies provided under Ss. 34 & 25‑A independently enure respectively to benefit of Unions and workers for enforcement of their personal rights.‑[Interpretation of statutes‑Industrial dispute]. M. A. Ghani for Petitioner. Ali Amjad for Respondent No.
1. Nemo for Respondent No.