Home Maxims & Terms Route-Permit meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Route-Permit

Route-Permit legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1989 SCMR 790 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S.49Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)Route permits, grant ofAuthority's discretionExtent of

Leave to appeal was granted to consider whether language of S.49, Motor Vehicles Ordinance, 1965, left any discretion with Regional Transport Authority, to refuse route permits if otherwise requirements of section had been fulfilled.

1970 SCMR 36 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Moter-Vehicle-Route permit-Appeal to Supreme Court against order of Board of Revenue pending before Supreme Court-Pending appeal order of Board of Revenue suspended and appellant permitted to ply buses on permits held by them Permits meanwhile expiring due to efflux of time-Petition praying that authorities be directed to renew permit pending appeal-Rejected.

1968 SCMR 1373 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Route-permit-Regional Transport Authority, in interest of public, passing , during currency of route-permits omnibus order forbidding plying of buses and trucks manufactured prior to 1950-Regional Transport Authority, held should act strictly in accordance with law prescribed by Act and Rules

Nevertheless order not interfered with since subsequent amendment in Act enabled R. T. A. to impose such condition and in view of the fact that Authority had done what was eminently desirable lit interest of public safety Motor Vehicles Act (IV of 1939), S.48 (a).

1968 PLD 287 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

S. 47-Route permit-Survey of route-Chairman, R. T. A. visiting area and respectable members of public requesting for provision of direct link between two terminii of route-Formal survey, held, not necessary, in circumstances of case-West Paki3tan Motor Vehicles Ordinance (XIX of 1965), S. 50(1) (a).

1965 PLD 104 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Ss. 59 (3) (b) & 60 (1) (a) - Route permit - Cancellation - Regional Transport Authority quasi judicial body - Finding regarding breach of S. 59 (3) (b) must be sustained by legal evidence-Mere fact that vehicle was involved in accident-No proof of vehicle having been driven at speed not authorized by law.

1964 PLD 121 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Applicants more or less similar in worth ability and capacity-R. T. A invariably best judge of merits.

1964 PLD 86 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit R. T. A. and not Chairman can grant temporary permits-Order of Chairman granting temporary permit subsequently ratified by R. T. A. Such orders cannot be sustained Temporary permit can be granted on conditions laid down in S. 62, Motor Vehicles Act (IV of 1939).

1964 PLD 82 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Decision of R. T. A. on point of fact carries great deal of weight.

1964 PLD 81 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Order of R. T. A. if not extremely wrong and arbitrary, not to be upset in appeal.

1963 PLD 94 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent
Route-Permit

New conditions cannot be imposed after grant of permit.

1963 PLD 90 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent
Route-Permit

New conditions cannot be imposed after permit has been granted-New conditions can be imposed on renewal of permit.

1963 PLD 76 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent
Route-Permit

Applicant for new permit not invested with a right to have a permit-Notice to applicant at time of consideration of application not necessary.

1963 PLD 69 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent
Route-Permit

Applications from Tribal Areas to be referred to Political Agent-Decisions to be taken after considering his recommendations.

1963 PLD 67 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Question whether temporary permit-holder is not complying with condition attached to permit to be determined by P. T. A.

1963 PLD 65 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent
Route-Permit

Application for grant of additional permit not received by R. T. A. because applications for particular route had not been specifically invited-Held, that application should be entertained and decided by R. T. A. on merits.

1963 PLD 45 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent
Route-Permit

Grant to Union Council to undertake work within its jurisdiction-Whether may be granted.

1963 PLD 39 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent
Route-Permit

Minimum economic unit-Two `B' parts may be considered normally as minimum economic unit-Long distance routes-R.T.A. should first fix minimum economic `B' part units and then take up question of granting number of permits to most deserving applicants.

1962 PLD 13 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit -New permits-Can be granted if transport requirements of public have increased.

1962 PLD 127 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit -(B Part) known as fleet chit-Grant.

1962 PLD 116 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit -Minimum of 2 ("B" Part) to be granted to individual operators in case of long routes.

1962 PLD 103 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit -Failure to ply buses for reasons beyond control of permit-holder-No ground for cancellation.

1962 PLD 83 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit -Temporary grant to Union Council-Benamidar owner of bus-Grant of permit, held not justified-R. T. A. to observe regular procedure if need is genuine and not to exercise restrictive powers meant for temporary needs-Motor Vehicles Apt (IV of 1939), Ss. 47, 57, & 62.

1962 PLD 39 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit -New concern having good financial position and starting on right line-To be encouraged in interest of healthy competition.

1962 PLD 37 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit -signature-Route falling in jurisdiction of two R. T. A.'s-Procedure. One R. T. A. exceeding its authority uniliterally decided as to the scope for additional through-services on particular routes, the major portion of which lay within the jurisdiction of another R. T. A. The correct procedure in such cases is for the R. r. A. concerned to determine the number of permits required in public interest and to divide the permits to be issued by each R. T. A. proportionately to the mileage lying within its jurisdiction.

1961 PLD 12 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Route permit-Permit-holder selling vehicle without permission of R. T. A.-Permit liable to cancellation.

1961 PLD 110 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Route permit-Grant of-New concern with no special record, not to be allowed to interlope in Region other than own.

1961 PLD 108 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Route permit-Condition that vehicles of 1954 and earlier snake would not ply on Rawalpindi-Murree Route-To apply to existing permit-holders, as soon as their permits of earlier make vehicles expire.

1961 PLD 101 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Route permit-Appeal by one director of Company-Other directors raising objection to appeal-Appeal not competent.

1961 PLD 9 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Route permit-Existing operator, if his previous record is satisfactory, has equal claim with new-comer, but has no preferential claim.

1961 PLD 91 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Route permit-Driver plying vehicle without uniform anti driving license-Breach of Condition No. 23, Part (A) of permit issued to company-Route permit suspended for one month Suspension not interfered with in appeal.

1961 PLD 87 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Route permit-R. T. A., may accept change in name of limited company for limited purpose of granting permits.

1961 PLD 8 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Route permit-Grant-Previous decision can be upset only if it was found erroneous.

1961 PLD 80 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Route permit-One "only" permit to new comer-Uneconomic unit-Principle not applicable in case of person having permits on various routes.

1961 PLD 73 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Route permit-Compromise promoting smooth running of alternative services between rival parties-Acceptable.

1961 PLD 71 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Route permit-Not necessary that B Part permit must always be carried and produced on demand.

1961 PLD 67 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Route permit-More permits on one route may be granted for public convenience.,

1961 PLD 56 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Route permit-Extension varying terms of existing permit May embrace only a short distance diversion.

1961 PLD 54 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Route permit-Company applying for permit-Record Company not satisfactory-New permit not to be, ground that there was no other applicant.

1961 PLD 47 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Route permit -Original home of permit- holders within jurisdiction of R.T.A.-Mere fact that they are also residing at place within jurisdiction of other R. T. A. no ground for cancellation of route permit-Motor Vehicles Act (IV of 1939), S. 60 (d).

1961 PLD 44 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Route permit-Route lying within jurisdiction of two Regional Transport Authorities-One R. T. A. granting route permit Other authority should countersign provided there is necessity for additional.

1961 PLD 43 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Route permit-Permits of all except A made permanent-A's case similar-A's permit to be also made permanent.

1961 PLD 42 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Route permit-New permits to be granted if there is genuine need to increase transport facilities.

1961 PLD 40 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Route permit-Grant of new route permit-Genuine-need of public to be taken into consideration.

1961 PLD 39 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Route permit -R. T. A. changing route without observing relevant provisions of Chapter IV, Motor Vehicles Act (IV of 1939) -Order set aside.

1961 PLD 35 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Route permit-Application for extension of route, actually, for new route which was wholly uncommon and unnatural-Applicant's service inefficient-Permit not to be granted.

1961 PLD 21 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Route permit-Terms of notification-R. T. A. can go beyond terms if there are good and sufficient reasons.

1961 PLD 17 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Route permit-Monopoly to one company not to be permitted Additional or new service-Existing operator has no overriding claim-Public convenience the sole criterion.

1961 PLD 1 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Route permit-New permit can be granted only in public interest.

1960 PLD 16 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Route-Permit Route permit-Monopoly in, not to be encouraged.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Route-Permit", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14502

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Route-Permit"

PLD 1961
Civil Revision No. 270 of 1960, decided on 9th January 1961.

P L D 1961 (W

PAKISTAN TRANSPORT Co. LTD. JHANG‑Petitioner Versus SHORKOT TRANSPORT Co. (REGD.) SHORKOT AND OTHERS ‑Respondents

Court:
CLC 2014
2014-April-28

2014 C L C 1433

YAR MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus PROVINCIAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BALOCHISTAN through Chairman and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Balochistan
PLD 1996
Civil Petition No. D‑1350 of 1991, decided on 8th August., 1995.

P L D 1996 Karachi 402

MOOSA KHAN ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and others ‑‑‑ Respondents

Court:
MLD 1998
1998-April-6

1998 M L D 1678

NASRULLAH — Petitioner Versus JAFFAR ULLAH and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Quetta
PLD 2010
2009-October-30

P L D 2010 Quetta 16

ABDUL REHMAN — Petitioner Versus PROVINCIAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BALOCHISTAN through Chairman and 3 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 1995
Constitutional Petition No. 27 of 1994, decided' on 27th October, 1994.

1995 C L C 1123

ABDUR RAZZAK‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD QASIM and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Quetta
CLC 2007
2006-April-6

2007 C L C 521

Syed KAMAL — Plaintiff Versus CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY and others — Defendants

Court: Karachi
CLC 1983
Constitutional Petition No. D‑415 of 1980, decided on 10th September, 1981.

1983 C L C 2732

CHAND BADHSAH AND 23 OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF SIND AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 2001
Writ Petition No.415 of 2000, decided on 30th January, 2001.

P L D 2001 Azad J& K 15

Raja SHAHPALL KHAN and 3 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus AZAD KASHMIR TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MUZAFFARABAD

Court:
PLD 1987
Constitutional Petition No. 87 of 1987, decided on 16th June, 1987.

P L D 1987 Quetta 223

AHMED SHAH‑‑Petitioner Versus Haji ABDUL HALEEM and 4 others‑‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑S. 62, proviso‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑‑Maxim: Audi alterm partem‑‑Cancellation of route permit‑‑Notice to affected party‑‑Nothing on record available to show that petitioner had any intimation about proceedings initiated by Authority regarding cancellation of his route permit‑‑Order of Authority showing that same had been passed merely on the basis of certain departmental enquiries without obtaining any explanation of petitioner‑‑Held such orders, apart from being repugnant to statutory requirement were also clearly violative of principle of audi alterm partem and negating principle of natural justice and thus were void as much as an order which was coram non judice and as such did not exist in the eye of law.‑‑Maxim.