Home Maxims & Terms Writ Proceedings meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Writ Proceedings

Writ Proceedings legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1984 MLD 109 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Art. 98Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.XXII, r.3(2) [as amended by Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972)]Writ proceedings-AbatementPetitioner dying during pendency of writ petition

Provisions of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 and particularly provisions of OXXII, r. 3 (2), C.PC. held, applicable to writ proceedings provided the matter is of civil nature.

[Abatement].

1981 SCMR 429 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

S. 25-A and Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199-Re-instatement-Writ proceedings-Employee dismissed from service for misconduct but re-instated on appeal-High Court on writ petition being filed dismissing same on ground of counsel having conceded matter being fought only as an academic matter for future guidance inasmuch as respondent had already resumed duty and that question of past benefits being only a consequential matter to be agitated before appropriate forum could not be proper subject-matter of writ petition-Held, re-instatement of petitioner to circumstances neither rendered proceedings in High Court infructuous nor made it only academic

Re-instatement having been made pursuant to order of Labour Appellate Tribunal having to be complied with, compliance made under protest acid subject to result of litigation and not conclusive -of matter.[Industrial dispute].

1981 SCMR 777 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
O. XXII, r. 3-Writ proceedings

Abatement-Civil Procedure Code, 1908, held, fully applicable to constitutional petitions and application for substitution of legal heirs must be made within prescribed time-Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199.-[Abatement]

1973 PLD 495 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Art. 98 - Writ proceedings - Remind order - Not final order - Cannot appropriately be interfered within writ jurisdiction.

1971 PLD 514 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Art. 98-Writ proceedings-Disputed question of fact

Cannot be gone into and investigated in writ proceedings.

1970 SCMR 601 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Art. 98-Writ proceedings Petitioner failing to appear before High Court in his writ petition cannot complain against orders passed.

1970 SCMR 494 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Art. 98-Writ proceedings Government servant-Date of birth whether correctly recorded in service book of Government employee-Question of fact-Cannot be determined in writ jurisdiction.

1970 SCMR 834 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Art. 98-Writ proceedings-High Court in writ proceedings not finding conviction and sentences illegal but merely directing sentences of imprisonment to run concurrently instead of consecutively as ordered by lower Court Order being to his benefit, accused, held, not aggrieved.

1968 PLD 403 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Art. 98-Writ proceedings-Admission of evidence-No-confidence resolution passed against Chairman, Town Committee-Resolution voted for by member alleged to have not taken oath of office-Document regarding administration of oath vehemently alleged as forged-Resolution challenged as without lawful authority and of no legal effect Court, in circumstances, allowed production of evidence on point and examination of petitioner by his counsel.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Writ Proceedings", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14585

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Writ Proceedings"

CLC 1981
Constitutional Petition No. 797 of 1974, decided on 25th February, 1980

1981 C L C 1569

ZAHOOR AND 3 OTHERS ‑Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (JUDICIAL),

Court: Karachi
MLD 1993
Civil Appeal No.92 of 1992, decided on 26th May, 1993.

1993 M L D 1608

MUHAMMAD ISMAIL and 9 others — Appellants Versus SHAHBAZ and 5 others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
CLC 1981
Writ Petition No. 10255 of 1980, decided on 4th October 1930.

1981 C L C 195

NAEEM AHMAD‑Petitioner Versus Mst. NUZHAT ALMAS AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PTD 1994
WA. No. 668 of 1992, decided on 3rd February, 1993.

1994 P T D 877

S.S. V. KUMAR Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and another

Court: 203 I T R 374
SCMR 1971
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 186 of 1970, ant decided on 21st October 1970.

1971 S C M R 98

ABDUL GHANI‑Petitioner Versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER AND 2 OTHERS — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1970
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 224 of 1969, decided on 24th October 1969.

1970 S C M R 180

FAZAL DIN-Petitioner Versus WALI MUHAMMAD AND 5 OTHERS — Respondents

Court: High Court
MLD 1984
Constitutional Petition No. 647 of,1972, decided on 15th January, 1984.

1984 M L D 109

S.M. ASKARI — Petitioner Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER and ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT

Court: Karachi
CLC 1981
Writ Petition No. 380‑R of 1979, decided on 17th April, 1979.

1981 C L C 1006

PROPERTY, LAHORE‑Petitioner Versus A. R. CHAUDHARY AND 4 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLC(CS) 1980
Appeal No. 887/570 of 1974, decided on 12th September 1979.

1980 P L C (C

Ch. ABDUL WAHEED Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

Court: Service Tribunal Punjab
SCMR 1980
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 946 of 1974, decided on 23rd December, 1979.

1980 S C M R 610

ISLAMABAD AND 2 OTHERS-Petitioners Versus Haji KHADIM HUSSAIN-Respondent

Court: High Court