1981 PLP 1569 (CLC)
ZAHOOR AND 3 OTHERS ‑Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (JUDICIAL),
| Citation | 1981 PLP 1569 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | B. G. N. Kazi, J |
| Parties | ZAHOOR AND 3 OTHERS ‑Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (JUDICIAL), |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 1569 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 1569 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: B. G. N. Kazi, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 1569 (CLC) (ZAHOOR AND 3 OTHERS ‑Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (JUDICIAL),). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- S. H. Rizvi for Petitioners.
- S. M. Raza for Respondents Nos. 3 to 9.
- Date of hearing : 4th February, 1980.
Headnotes / Summary
(a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ ‑‑ Art. 199‑Writ proceedings‑Question of fact‑Question whether petitioners left a certain place and settled down at another place question of fact based on mere assertion‑High Court, held, cannot go into such questions of fact in writ proceedings.‑[Question of fact]. (b) Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958)‑ ‑‑Sched.‑Transfer of evacuee property‑No specific method of payment of price being laid down in High Court's order and in decision of letters patent appeal reference being to their compen sation books which only claimants have and not compensation book purchased by them, contention as to impugned order being not in con sonance with High Court's order, held, not acceptable.
Judgment & Decree
Constitutional Petition No. 797 of 1974, decided on 25th February, 1980 (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ ‑‑ Art. 199‑Writ proceedings‑Question of fact‑Question whether petitioners left a certain place and settled down at another place question of fact based on mere assertion‑High Court, held, cannot go into such questions of fact in writ proceedings.‑[Question of fact]. (b) Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958)‑ ‑‑Sched.‑Transfer of evacuee property‑No specific method of payment of price being laid down in High Court's order and in decision of letters patent appeal reference being to their compen sation books which only claimants have and not compensation book purchased by them, contention as to impugned order being not in con sonance with High Court's order, held, not acceptable. S. H. Rizvi for Petitioners. S. M. Raza for Respondents Nos. 3 to