Jury
Jury legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Trial-Chief Court of Sind trying criminal case on its original side-Empowered to follow procedure applicable to High Courts in matter of jury trial-Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ch. XXIII.
Telling jury as a matter of law that if they find, accused did utter words complained of, he was guilty of offence of erecting a public mischief-Criminal Procedure Code (V of 7898), S. 297.
Jury Jury-Empanelling of-Correct procedure-R. 54, Chap. I, General Rules and Circular Orders, High Court of Judicature at Fort William.
Jury Jury-Not directed as to effect of failure to supply to accused copies of statements under Ss. 161, 162, Cr. P. C. Misdirection.
Jury -Misdirection-Circumstantial evidence-Omission to direct that circumstances of case were incapable of explanation on any other hypothesis than that of guilt of accused-Charge bad -Conviction set aside.
Jury-Misdirection-Contributory negligence-Summing up should be considered as a whole.
Jury-Verdict of guilty-Test-Question to be posed by Judge-Whether a reasonable jury could find such a verdict -Not whether in Judge's opinion case herd been established beyond reasonable doubt-(Ceylon case).
When should not he set aside.
Jury-Misdirection (law of Jamaica)-Jury asked to draw conclusions from prisoner's failure to go into witness-box -Prisoner not bound to give evidence-Prosecution to make out case beyond reasonable doubt.
"Jury", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14645
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Jury"
P
BAHADUR KHAN‑Appellant Versus CROWN — Respondent
Court:P L D 1958 Dacca 371
ABDUL ALI PRAMANIK‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent.
Court:P L D 1956 Supreme Court (Ind
MOSEB KAKA CHOWDHRY and another‑Appellants Versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1954 Federal Court 176
CHAND BARMAN-Appellant Versus THE CROWN-Respondent
Court:P L D 1947 Privy Council 103
THIAGARAJA BHAGAVATHAR and another- Appellants Versus EMPEROR
Court:P L D 1953 Federal Court 1
GHULAM MOHI-UD-DIN-Appellant Versus THE CROWN-Respondent
Court:P L D 1956 Privy Council 61
EBENEZER THEODORE JOSHUA‑‑Appellant Versus THE QUEEN‑‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1960 Dacca 955
SAMAR MALIK AND OTHERS‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1958 Dacca 75
ASGAR and others‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1958 Dacca 301
THE SUPERINTENDENT AND REMEMBRANCER OF LEGAL :AFFAIRS; GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN — Appellants Versus RAGRBAT ALI and others‑Respondents
Court: