Home Maxims & Terms Jury meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Jury

Jury legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1969 SCMR 830 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Trial-Chief Court of Sind trying criminal case on its original side-Empowered to follow procedure applicable to High Courts in matter of jury trial-Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ch. XXIII.

1956 PLD 61 PRIVY-COUNCIL Judicial Precedent
Jury Jury-Charge-Misdirection

Telling jury as a matter of law that if they find, accused did utter words complained of, he was guilty of offence of erecting a public mischief-Criminal Procedure Code (V of 7898), S. 297.

1954 PLD 18 DHAKA-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Jury Jury-Empanelling of-Correct procedure-R. 54, Chap. I, General Rules and Circular Orders, High Court of Judicature at Fort William.

1954 PLD 15 DHAKA-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Jury Jury-Not directed as to effect of failure to supply to accused copies of statements under Ss. 161, 162, Cr. P. C. Misdirection.

1952 PLD 81 DHAKA-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Jury -Misdirection-Circumstantial evidence-Omission to direct that circumstances of case were incapable of explanation on any other hypothesis than that of guilt of accused-Charge bad -Conviction set aside.

1951 PLD 47 PRIVY-COUNCIL Judicial Precedent

Jury-Misdirection-Contributory negligence-Summing up should be considered as a whole.

1951 PLD 42 PRIVY-COUNCIL Judicial Precedent

Jury-Verdict of guilty-Test-Question to be posed by Judge-Whether a reasonable jury could find such a verdict -Not whether in Judge's opinion case herd been established beyond reasonable doubt-(Ceylon case).

1950 PLD 86 PRIVY-COUNCIL Judicial Precedent
JuryVerdict

When should not he set aside.

1949 PLD 299 PRIVY-COUNCIL Judicial Precedent

Jury-Misdirection (law of Jamaica)-Jury asked to draw conclusions from prisoner's failure to go into witness-box -Prisoner not bound to give evidence-Prosecution to make out case beyond reasonable doubt.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Jury", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14645

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Jury"

PLD 1950
Criminal Appeal No. 86 of 1949, decided on 11th August 1949.

P

BAHADUR KHAN‑Appellant Versus CROWN — Respondent

Court:
PLD 1958
Appeal No. 324 of 1956, decided on 11th June 1957.

P L D 1958 Dacca 371

ABDUL ALI PRAMANIK‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent.

Court:
PLD 1956
Criminal Appeal No. 15 of 1955 from Criminal Appeal No. 94 of 1952, dated 24th March 1953, decided on 18th April 1956.

P L D 1956 Supreme Court (Ind

MOSEB KAKA CHOWDHRY and another‑Appellants Versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1954
Criminal appeal No. 30 of 1953, decided on 24th March 1954.

P L D 1954 Federal Court 176

CHAND BARMAN-Appellant Versus THE CROWN-Respondent

Court:
PLD 1947
Privy Council Appeal No. 79 of 1946, decided on 27th March 1947, from Madras

P L D 1947 Privy Council 103

THIAGARAJA BHAGAVATHAR and another- Appellants Versus EMPEROR

Court:
PLD 1953
Criminal Appeal No. 13 of 1951, decided on 11th November 1952.

P L D 1953 Federal Court 1

GHULAM MOHI-UD-DIN-Appellant Versus THE CROWN-Respondent

Court:
PLD 1956
Privy Council Appeal No. 1 of 1954, decided on 7th December 1954, from the Court of Appeal for the Windward Islands and Leeward Islands.

P L D 1956 Privy Council 61

EBENEZER THEODORE JOSHUA‑‑Appellant Versus THE QUEEN‑‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1960
Appeal No. 454 of 1959, decided on 8th December, 1959.

P L D 1960 Dacca 955

SAMAR MALIK AND OTHERS‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1958
Appeals Nos. 256 and 266 of 1956, decided on 20th May 1957.

P L D 1958 Dacca 75

ASGAR and others‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1958
Government Appeal, No.4 of 1955, decided on 1st February 1957.

P L D 1958 Dacca 301

THE SUPERINTENDENT AND REMEMBRANCER OF LEGAL :AFFAIRS; GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN — Appellants Versus RAGRBAT ALI and others‑Respondents

Court: