Pendente lite nihil innovetur

Neither party to litigation can alienate or deal with immovable property so as to affect his opponent-Persons purchasing land from allotte by means of registered sale-deed for valuable consideration but allotment later cancelled on revision by higher Settlement Authority-Orders passed by lower Settlement Authority for allotment of land being subject to usual incidence of appeal sand revision, purchasers not entitled to any relief in writ proceedings. [Writ-Maxim].

Neither party to litigation involving ht to immovable property can alienate or deal with Property. Pendent lite so as to affect his opponent petitioners purchasing land from transferees but subsequently on revision allotment an, transfer of land to vendors cancelled by Settlement Commissioner:-Allotment of land to vendors being subject to usual incidence of appeal anal revision alienation by vendors and purchase of land by petitioner held of no effect Fact that petitioners applied to Settlement Commissioner for being impleaded as parties in revision but no order seed of no avail in view of petitioners themselves being liable to blame for such state of affairs for not having pressed their application

Lend having been transferred by Central Government in virtue of its powers under S. 25(2 4(a), Act XII of 1957, and building having been, constructed over land after delivery of possession High Court, held, justifie