Appointment of Chief Inspector of Mines
Appointment of Chief Inspector of Mines legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
S. 4(1) and West Pakistan Inspectorate of Mines (Gazetted Posts) Recruitment Rules, 1968-Appointment of Chief Inspector of Mines -Validity-Appellant's challenge to validity of Rules if accepted legal position emerging as there being no rules in existence at time of making appointment and all what S. 4(l) necessitated in circumstance being for Provincial Government to appoint a duly qualified person Respondent holding a degree in Mining Engineering from Punjab University, a post graduate degree in same subject from Stanford University, California, U. S. A. and having more than 10 years experience in Mining Industry, held, properly and validly appointed as Chief Inspector of Mines in terms of Statute.
"Appointment of Chief Inspector of Mines", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15117
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Appointment of Chief Inspector of Mines"
1981 S C M R 74
M. U. A. KHAN-Appellant Versus M. SULTAN AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Court: --- Ss. 4(1) & 29(a) read with West Pakistan Inspectorate of Mines (Gazetted Posts) Recruitment Rules, 1968 and Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Arts. 178 (2) & 179--Appointment-Validity-Authority conferred by Arts. 178(2) & 179 of Constitution of Pakistan (1962) Embraces both regular and temporary services of Province, wider in scope and on higher plane than authority conferred by sub-Constitu tional legislation i.e., S. 29 (a) of Mines Act, 1923-Appointment of officers of Inspectorate of Mines, held, could validly be made under S. 4(1) in absence of rules framed under S. 19 (a) of Mines Act, 1923. Civil services.1984 P L C 347
(SERVICES), KARACHI PIPE MILLS Versus GHULAM AKBAR AND OTHERS
Court: National Industrial Relations Commission1984 P L C 1672
KARACHI PIPE MILLS Versus GHULAM AKBAR AND OTHERS
Court: National Industrial Relations CommissionP L D 1974 Supreme Court 228
M. U. A. KHAN‑Appellant Versus Rana M. SULTAN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court:1983 P L C (C
BASHIR AHMED Versus KHURSHIDUL HAQ AND ANOTHER
Court: Lahore High Court1996 M L D 1580
ALI NAWAZ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Karachi2003 P L C (C
PERVAIZ AKHTAR Versus CHIEF INSPECTOR OF MINES and another
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2003 S C M R 1731
PERVAIZ AKHTAR — Petitioner Versus CHIEF INSPECTOR OF MINES and another — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L, D 1981 Karachi 437
SIRAJUL ARFEEN‑Appellant Versus CHIEF SETTLEMENT & REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER,
Court: Sched. VI, para. 19 ‑ Provisions of para. 19 deferring payments tentatively to extent prescribed therein until Government prescribed scale of compensation‑Intention of legislation that upon determination of scale, amount of deferred payment of transfer price under para. 19 could be adjusted against compensation finally determined and balance paid by transferee by other modes.‑Interpretation of statutes.1996 P L C (C
EJAZ HUSSAIN Versus ABDUL QAYYUM
Court: Quetta High Court