1984 PLP 347 (PLC)

(vii) One Part‑time Member to represent workers and one part‑time Member to represent employers, and (viii) Such other Members as Federal Government may appoint. (Sd.) (ATAUR REHMAN), Section Officer.

5. Subsection (3) of section 22‑A provides that the qualifications for appointment as a Member or as the Chairman of the Commis sion shall be such as may be determined by the Federal Govern ment Such qualifications were determined by Notification No. S. R. O. 355 (1)/76, dated 3rd April, 1976, which reads as follows :‑ "Government of Pakistan Ministry of Labour, Manpower Health and Population Planning (Labour Division). NOTIFICATION Dated 3rd April, 1976. No. S. R. O. 355 (I)/76.‑‑In exercise of powers under subsection (3) of section 22‑A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 (XXII I of 1969), the Federal Government is pleased to determine as follows the qualifications for appointment as a Member or as the Chairman :‑ (i) To be qualified for appointment as the Chairman of the Commission a person shall be one who is, or has been a Judge of a High Court or a Secretary to the Government of Pakistan. (ii) To be qualified for appointment as a Member of a Commission, a person shall be‑ (a) A Joint Secretary to the Government of Pakistan. (b) Secretary to a Provincial Government in the Labour Depart ment. (c) A Law Graduate who has practised as an Advocate for not less than ten years ; or (d) an Officer of the Federal Government or a Provincial Government who has for not less than three years, held a post in Grade‑19 of the National Pay Scale and has not less than ten years experience in the administration or. inter pretation of Labour Laws. OR 17 years' experience of Labour administration/Labour rela tions in Grade‑17 or above in a Federal or Provincial Labour Department (added by Notification No. S. R. O. 680 (1)/82, dated 13th July, 1982. (Sd.)

6. As at present constituted, the Commission comprises of the following 12 (twelve) members who have been appointed by the Federal Government under respective Notifications :‑ (i) Five full‑time Members viz. Chairman, Senior Member, Member-I, Member‑II and Member‑III. (ii) Five Part‑time Members viz. Joint Secretary Labour and Four Secretaries Labour Department of each of the four Provincial Governments. (iii) Two Part‑time Members to advise the Chairman one represent ing employers and the other representing industry‑wise trade unions, federations of such trade unions and federations at the national level under section 22‑A (5) of I. R. O., 1969.

7. Dealing now with the objections raised by Mr. M. L. Shahani for the respondents/accused, the first objection is that the Commission comprises of only four whole‑time Members including the Chairman, which it is contended, is not in compliance with section 22‑A (2) of T. R. O 1969 which provides that "the Commission shall consist of not lest than seven members including the Chairman". It is contended that the word "Member" in the said subsection means whole‑time member and that the appointments of part‑time/ex officio members is not contemplated by section 22‑A of I. R. O., 1969. In my opinion this contention has no force. The word "Member" has not been defined in the Ordinance, nor is it in anywhere qualified to mean only a full‑time Member. The word `Member' should therefore be given its ordinary wide meaning and in my view includes part‑time/ex officio members as well. A person appoint ed as part‑time member is none the less a member and has the right to participate in the deliberations and activities of the Commission. It is not uncommon for the Government to appoint persons to sit on various Commissions, Corporate Bodies or other Bodies in their capacity as part time or ex officio members, in view of administrative or financial considerations. Moreover, by conferring a discretion on the Federal Govern ment to determine the qualifications for appointment as Member under subsection (3) of section 22‑A of I. R. O., 1969, the Legislature bas left the composition of the Members of the Commission to the discretion of the Federal Government to determine whether a Member shall be whole‑time/ part‑time or ex officio Member. The qualifications prescribed by the Federal Government for appointment of the Members other than the Chairman who is or has been a Judge of a High Court vide Notification S. R. O. 355 (I)) 76, dated 3rd April, 1976 above reproduced, are such that in addition to their official duties as Secretaries or Joint Secretary of the Provincial/Federal Government, they shall act as part‑time members of the Commission. This does not undermine their status as Members of the Commission, as for all intents and purposes, they are Members of the Commission and eligible to participate in its proceedings. As far as the power to appoint ex officio Members is concerned, the same is addi tionally derived under section 15 of General Clauses Act, 1897 which provides that the appointment of a person may also be made by virtue of office of such person as held by the Lahore High Court in Muhammad Siddique v. Ch. Fazal Din and three others (P L D 1982 Lab. 262), I am therefore, of the view that the word 'Member' includes also a part‑time ex officio Member.

8. The next objection is that the appointment of two Members under section 22‑A (5) of I. R. O., 1969 to advise the Chairman, one to represent the employers and the other to represent the industry‑wise trade unions, have not been appointed in the prescribed manner, as no rules prescribing the qualifications for their appointment have been framed. It was held by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in M. U. A. Khan v. Rana M. Sultan (P L D 1974 S C 228), that the omission to frame necessary rules by the designated authority cannot be construed as having the effect of rendering the statute nugatory and unworkable. In that case, the qualifications required for appointment of Chief Inspector of Mines, were to be prescribed by the appropriate Government under section 29 of the Mines Act, 1923. The appointment of the Respondent, as Chief Inspector of Mines by the Government, in the absence of the Rules was nevertheless held to be valid. It is further submitted that even if these two Members are excluded from the membership, for the sake of argument, the strength of the Commission including the part‑time/ex officio Members is more than the required number of seven Members.

9. The final objection is that the part‑time Member required to be nominated by the Ministry of Industries under Notification No. S. R. O. 1139 (I)/72, dated 6th November, 1972 has not been filled in. It is no doubt true that the Ministry of Industries has so far failed to nominate the part‑time Member, but the existence of this vacancy will not render the constitution of the Commission defective as it already bas more than the required minimum of the seven members. Moreover, subsection (4) of section 22‑B of

1. R. O., 1969 provides that the proceedings of the Commission are not affected by any defect in its constitution.

10. For the foregoing reasons, I do not find any substance in these objections, which are dismissed. A. E. Appeal dismissed.