Legislature

Mala fide could not be attributed to the legislature but if a legislature deliberately and repeatedly embarked upon a venture to nullify considered judicial verdict in an unlawful manner, trample the constitutional mandate and violate the law then it was difficult to attribute bona fide to it either.

Wisdom of legislature should not be questioned by Courts, as long as the law in question is not violative of fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution

As long as Legislature has competence to legislate grounds or wisdom of Legislature remains its exclusive prerogative

Legislature is not debarred from promulgating provisions of law under the Constitution.

Wisdom of legislature should not be questioned by Courts, as long as the law in question is not violative of fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution

As long as Legislature has competence to legislate grounds or wisdom of Legislature remains its exclusive prerogative

Legislature is not debarred from promulgating provisions of law under the Constitution.

Legislature could not repose any power, essentially legislative, in another body or organ; it could not efface itself and set up a parallel legislative authority; it must exercise its judgment on vital matters of policy and enact the general principles which should be embodied in the legislation

Legislature could, however, confer upon any person or body, fit to exercise it, the power to work out details and particulars for carrying out its policy and in order to give effect to the legislation in a particular direction

Legislature could not delegate its power to make a law but it could make a law to delegate powers to determine some facts or state of things upon which the law made or intended to make its own action dependant

Where the law was flexible, having laid down broad principles of its policy, the Legislature could leave the details to be supplied by the administrator to adjust to the rapid changing circumstances.

Mala fide could not be attributed to the legislature.

Legislature could not repose any power, essentially legislative, in another body or organ; it could not efface itself and set up a parallel legislative authority; it must exercise its judgment on vital matters of policy and enact the general principles which should be embodied in the legislation

Legislature could, however, confer upon any person or body, fit to exercise it, the power to work out details and particulars for carrying out its policy and in order to give effect to the legislation in a particular direction

Legislature could not delegate its power to make a law but it could make a law to delegate powers to determine some facts or state of things upon which the law made or intended to make its own action dependant

Where the law was flexible, having laid down broad principles of its policy, the Legislature could leave the details to be supplied by the administrator to adjust to the rapid changing circumstances.

Legislature could overcome the effect of any judgment of the superior courts by way of legislation.

Bias, or the preception of bias has to be established.

Legislation of law is the domain and prerogative of the legislature, which has wisdom to promulgate a law to achieve a particular object and purpose presumably promulgating such laws legally, validly and constitutionally on the basis of its competence.

Legislature has the authority to provide for retrospective application of an Act.

Presumption is that the Legislature does not transgress its jurisdiction and invade the fundamental rights given by the Constitution.

[Fundamental Rights].

Presumption is that the Legislature does not transgress its jurisdiction and invade the fundamental rights given by the Constitution.

Legislature 'Retrospective legislation taking away rights can competently be passed I legislature provided that it does not violate any Constitutional provision, right mandate.

[Retrospective legislation].

Function of judiciary is not to question the wisdom of legislature in making a particular law nor it can refuse to enforce it even if the result of it be to nullify its own decisions, provided the law is competently made,

Authority of Legislature-Cannot be challenged on ground of mala fides.

Institutions or functionaries created by Law-Privileges and duty.

-Acts of Parliament derogatory from power of subsequent Parliaments bind not.

Legislature-Powers of-Legislature in Pakistan, whether Provincial or Central, a sovereign Legislature. within its own field-Empowered to legislate both prospectively and retrospectively subject, however, to provision that vested right can be taken away only by express words or necessary intendment of statute.

Whether and to what extent competent to delegate its powers of legislation to outside agency.

May make laws a.1nending existing laws whether during pendency of proceedings before a Court or after decision of a proceeding involving application of existing law-[Supreme Court's decision that Hats and Bazaars were covered by provisions of S. 20 (2) (a) (b), East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 (XXVIII of 1951)Governor's Ordinance (East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy (Second Amendment) Ordinance (XII of 1960) declaring Hats and Bazaars never to have been so included].

Legislature Law-maker not bound by view of predecessor.