Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Relinquishment meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Relinquishment

Relinquishment legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1956 PLD 389 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Whether passes title to property relinquished. A deed of relinquishment pure and simple does not pass title in property to a person in whose favour the deed is executed. Nevertheless if the deed by the language employed can be construed as a transfer, it will have effect as such.

1956 PLD 795 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Relinquishment

By Muslim heir of expected inheritance for consideration-Whether valid and enforceable when inheritance opens-Whether relinquishment operates as estoppel Spes successions-Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), S. 6.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Relinquishment", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15123

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Relinquishment"

MLD 2017
2016-December-20

2017 M L D 1699

AMANULLAH — Appellant Versus INAMULLAH and 5 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
PLD 1997
Writ Petition No.7350 of 1993, decided on 20th March, 1997.

P L D 1997 Lahore 417

Mst. JAMILA BIBI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MIAN KHAN and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court:
CLC 2021
2019-November-13

2021 C L C 303

GULZAR MUHAMMAD and others — Petitioners Versus SARDAR MUHAMMAD and others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar (Mingora Bench)
PLD 1956
Execution First Appeal No. 7 of 1955 decided on 23rd January 1956, from the Court of Muhammad Ashfaq Ali, Civil judge, 1st Class, Lahore, dated the 18th October 1954.

P L D 1956 (W

Decree‑Holder‑Appellant Versus MIRAJ‑UD‑DIN and others‑Judgment‑Debtor-Respondents

Court:
PTD 2001
Case Referred No. 18 of 1991, decided on 15th June, 1999

2001 P T D 2804

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX Versus SANGHAM ENTERPRISES

Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court (India)
MLD 2004
the basis of Islamic teachings and principles---Plaintiff could not opt or contract out of such protection and the act of relinquishment by a sister was void and ineffective and her inheritance having accrued in her favour on her father's death remained intact at all the relevant times__ Since the relinquishment deed had been declared void and againSt the public policy and the same having no presumption of truth, therefore, the plaintiff had been able to establish a prima facie case in her favour-Balance of convenience was also in her favour and in case the property was transferred by the defendants to some other persons, the plaintiff would suffer irreparable loss and according to the principle of lis pendens, the plaintiff had to indulge herself in complicated litigation---High Court declined to interfere with the concurrent judgments passed by two Courts below---Revision was dismissed in circumstances

2004 M L D 1699

RAB NAWAZ KHAN and another — Petitioners Versus Mst. WAZIRAN MAI and 6 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PTD 1971
Income‑Tax Reference No. 75 of 1964, decided on 3rd February 1969.

1971 P T D 643

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX (CENTRAL), CALCUTTA Versus ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CO. (PVT). LTD.

Court: Calcutta (India)
PTD 1989
Civil Appeals Nos. 1905 and 1906 of 1974 and 3414 of 1984, decided on 29th March,1989.

1989 P T D 1319

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY Versus RASIKLAL MANEKLAL (HUF)

Court: Supreme Court of India
YLRN 2016
N/A

2016 Y L R Note 132

GHULAM HAIDER and others — Petitioners Versus ELAHI BAKSH and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
MLD 1992
Revision Application No.63 of 1992, decided on 12th March, 1992.

1992 M L D 1598

AZHAR HUSSAIN ALVI ‑‑‑ Applicant Versus Mst. KHURSHEED AKHTAR‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library