Badgering
Badgering legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
"badgering" and severe cross-examination-Not easy to make demarcation between the two.
"Badgering", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15136
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Badgering"
2004 M L D 424
SALEEM and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore2015 P Cr
Mst. RIFFAT PARVEEN — Petitioner Versus REGIONAL DIRECTOR ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT MULTAN REGION, MULTAN and 7 others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1988 Lahore 489
HASSAN ALI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE COLLECTOR, CENTRAL EXCISE & LAND CUSTOMS LAHORE and another‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑Ss.167(81) & 17 7‑A‑‑ Ingredients of offence under S.167(81)‑‑Gold was not seized by the Customs but it was seized by the Police, who found that no case of smuggling was made out, but delivered the gold to the Customs authorities to wash their hands of the case and to permit the Customs to seize the same, if they considered any, offence was made out‑‑Burden of proof not shifted on accused in circumstances.‑‑ Burden of proof‑.P L D 1972 Peshawar 22
FARHATULLAH KHAN‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1983 Supreme Court 286
STATE-Appellant Versus HABIBUR RAHMAN AHD OTHERS-Respondents
Court: - S. 3 read with Penal Code :(XLV of -1860), S. 302 and Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 161-Murder-Criminal trial-Evidence-Words "evidence" and "proved" in S. 3 of Evidence Act-Definitions-Consideration of all "matters" carries wider connotation than "evidence"-Circumstantial deduction reaching "probability", a mental cognition which leads to "supposition" regarding existence of a fact "probability" not lower than "likelihood" which is higher than a mere possibility, a surmise or a conjecture-Courts applying some artificial rules of evidence must attach due and purposeful importance to aspect of statutory mandate--Defence complaining about authenticity of police statements recorded under S. 161, Cr.- P. C. and statement of one of prosecution witnesses stated to be missing-Elaborate enquiry not considered necessary regarding such statements-Court can in such case, give a reasoned finding about which set of copies was "proved" on probabilities" in pursuance of definition. of word "proved" in S. 3 of Evidence Act.-Words and phrases.P L D 2021 Supreme Court 671
SAEEDA SULTAN — Petitioner Versus LIAQAT ALI ORAKZAI and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1970 Lahore 235
THE UNITED BANK LTD.‑Petitioner Versus MESSRS PAK WHEAT PRODUCTS LTD.‑Respondent
Court:2008 C L C 697
IMRAN AHMED KHAN — Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Defence and another — Respondents
Court: Karachi2008 P L C (C
IMRAN AHMED KHAN Versus PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Defence and another
Court: Karachi High Court