Home Maxims & Terms Municipal Account Code 1930 meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Municipal Account Code 1930

Municipal Account Code 1930 legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1984 SCMR 80 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Ch. V, rr. 13 & 32-A-Municipal Administration Ordinance (X of 1960), S. 33-Sale of Goods Act (III of 1930), Ss. 4, 18, 23, 24, 25 & 62-Oil Company having Regional Office at L bringing goods within municipal limits of F and re-exporting to Company's own premises outside municipal limits of F-Levy of octroi Nothing on record showing any inquiry having been made by municipal authorities at F to ascertain as to terms and conditions of sale transaction made at Regional Office in pursuance whereof re-export was done-Municipal authority at F initiating proceedings for recovery of octroi amount on basis of Goods supplied to "non company's premises"-"Contract of sale" and "actual sale "Distinction-Test for determining passing of ownership-Parties to agreement can exclude any of terms or conditions which law usually attaches to contract of sale and create for themselves any special rights and obligations that they please - Held, question of fact cannot be determined without reference to actual term of contract where

1984 SCMR 67 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Arts. 185(3) & 280-Constitution of Pakistan (1972), Art. 281West Pakistan Private Colleges (Management and Control) Ordinance (XX of 1970), S. 8(1) - Gordon College, Rawalpindi Order, 1972 [M. L. A. Zone `C'] No. 234, para. 8 [as amended by Gordon College, Rawalpindi (Amendment) Order, 1972 [M.L.A. Zone `C'] No. 234, para. 3 - Leave to appeal granted to consider contentions (1) that order of suspension of College teacher bad been merely a repetition of earlier order which was illegal and as such same could not have beers revived (2) that Martial Law Order, 1972 [Zone `C'] Nos. 234 & 255 though given general protection by Art. 281, Constitution of Pakistan (1972) were deemed repealed by Art. 280, Constitution of Pakistan (1973) and as such even if they retained position of sub-constitutional legislation, their virus could be questioned in Courts of law, (3) that Martial Law Order, 1972 [Zone `C'] Nos. 234 & 255 were ultra vires of legal norm as they placed unqualified discretion in hands of Administrator of

1958 PLD 493 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 173-Municipal Account Code, 1930, r. XI. 6

Ground rent payable to Committee-Power to enhance-Rests in the Committee and not the Executive Officer or Lands Officer-S. 173 inapplicable,

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Municipal Account Code 1930", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15299

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Municipal Account Code 1930"

PLD 1958
Writ Petition No. 720 of 1957, decided on 20th March 1958, under Article 170 of the Constitution.

P L D 1958 (W

Hafiz GHULAM RASOOL and others‑Petitioners Versus MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, JHANG and another‑Respondents

Court:
SCMR 1984
Civil Appeal No. 270 of 1981, decided on 2nd July, 1983.

1984 S C M R 80

MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, LYALLPUR-Appellant Versus BURMAH SHELL OIL STORAGE & DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD-Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1975
Civil Appeal No. K-14 of 1973, decided on 13th January 1975.

1975 S C M R 368

Appellant Versus KARACHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION-Respondent

Court: High Court
PTD 1971
Income‑tax Reference No. 96 of 1964, decided on 22nd February 1968.

1971 P T D 55

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, WEST BENGAL Versus NAWN ESTATES (PRIVATE) LTD.

Court: Calcutta (India)
PLD 1969
Criminal Reference No. 217 of 1968, decided on 24th January 1969.

P L D 1969 Peshawar 77

KHITAB GUL‑Petitioner Versus NIAZ MUHAMMAD‑Respondent

Court: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ss. 145(1) & 537‑Non‑compliance with provision regarding making of preliminary order under S. 145(1) ‑ Vitiates proceedings ‑‑ Omission, an illegality, not curable under S. 537‑Mg. Po Lon v. Mg. Ba On and another (1925) Rang. 111 ; Kapoor Chand and another v. Suraj Prasad A I R 1933 All. 264 ; Municipal Committee, Kohat v. Mst. Piari A I R 1947 Pesh. 8 ; The State v. Muhammad Azam P L D 1960 Pesh. 47 ; Noor Nuhammad v. Rajah Ali P L D 1965 Dacca 410 and Arshad Mahmood v. Masood Khan P L D 1969 Lah. 74 ref..
CLC 1983
First Civil Appeals Nos. 17, 18 and 19 of 1981, decided on 11th November, 1982.

1983 C L C 865

LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER (B & R), HYDERABAD ‑Appellant Versus Seth ALLAH DI NO‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLD 1959
First Appeal No. 18 of 1953, decided on 4th May 1959.

P L D 1959 (W

Mst. AMTULLBAI and others‑Appellants Versus M. S. M. BAKHTIYARI‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1962
Civil Revisions Nos. 249 & 278 of 1960, decided on 1st December 1961.

of the agreement had taken place at Rawalpindi, and as the plaintiffs had received the reply to their notice at Rawalpindi, th

MESSRS. S. M. QASIM & Co.‑Petitioner Versus MESSRS. Sh. AZIMUDDIN‑Respondent

Court: (c) Advocate‑Authorised to "act", without any "express" authority to refer case to arbitration‑Advocate's authority, held, included power to refer case to arbitration‑Arbitration Act (X of 1940), S. 21‑Din Muhammad and other v. Farooq Mirza P L D 1955 Sind 62 dissented from.
CLC 1985
Letters Patent Appeals Nos. 115 of 1970 and 75 to 78 of 1972; decided on 29th November, 1984.

1985 C L C 1259

SALEH SHAH-Appellant Versus S.I.T.E. and others-Respondents

Court: Karachi
CLC 2022
2022-January-18

2022 C L C 668

JAVED AHMED MIR — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL and others — Respondents

Court: Islamabad