Adequate remedy
Adequate remedy legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Term "proceedings" is a very comprehensive term, and generally speaking, means a prescribed course of action for enforcing a legal right and hence it necessarily embraces requisite steps by which judicial action is invoked
Word 'adequate' appears to have been used in general sense which connotes not sufficiency but promptness in obtaining relief.
"Adequate remedy", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1535
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Adequate remedy"
2007 Y L R 3005
Mst. BALQEES BIBI — Petitioner Versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER and 4others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2003 Y L R 2168
GHULAM ALI alias SADORO and others — Petitioners Versus S.H.O., POLICE STATION VEEHAR, DISTRICT LARKANA and others — Respondents
Court: Karachi2002 C L C 1446
SABIR REHMAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF N.W. F. P., FORESTRY, FISHERIES, WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT AT CIVIL SECRETARIAT, PESHAWAR
Court: Peshawar2003 Y L R 1316
MOULA BUX alias MOULEDINO — Petitioner Versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION HATRI GHULAM SHAH and 2 others — Respondents
Court: KarachiP L D 2024 Supreme Court 838
MUHAMMAD SAFEER and others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD AZAM and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2005 Peshawar 88
WASIM REHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Defence and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court:1987 C L C 2446
MUHAMMAD NAJIB and others‑ ‑Petitioners Versus REGISTRAR, CO‑OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR and others‑‑ Respondents
Court: Azad J & K2003 S C M R 928
Messrs SHIFA MEDICOS — Petitioner Versus WAFAQI MOHTASIB (OMBUDSMAN) and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1969 Dacca 205
DAKHINA RANJAN BARUA‑Petitioner Versus (I) SUB‑DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHITTAGONG,
Court: Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Art. 98(2)‑"Other adequate remedy"‑Election of Chairman of Union Committee‑Held, the other adequate remedy was available under rr. 10, 11, 12, 13, East Pakistan Union Councils and Town and Union Committees (Election of Chairman) Rules, 1965 ‑ Rules, self‑contained Application under Art. 98 instituted by a member of Committee; an application by defeated candidate, in fact, was already pending under r. 10 before Collector‑Application for writ dismissed-- Position would not be same if applicant under Art. 98 was an ordinary citizen and not a member of Committee or Council --Finality of order, in dispute petition under the Rules, leaves High Court's jurisdiction under Art. 98 unaffected.1996 M L D 69
AURANGZEB KAMRAN ESHAI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through
Court: Lahore