Home Maxims & Terms Seniority-cum-fitness meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Seniority-cum-fitness

Seniority-cum-fitness legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2010 PLC(CS) 133 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 12(6)Contract Appointment Policy of Punjab, 2004Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199Constitutional petitionSeniority-cum-fitnessPost reserved for in-service quotaInterferenceScope

Petitioner was eligible for promotion as Assistant on the basis of seniority-cum-fitness for the post reserved for selection from within office

Authorities took plea that Secretary Education of the Provincial Government had directed the Board to shift the mode of recruitment from regular to contract and to make all appointments against the post reserved for selection from within the office and direct recruitment on merit and to make strictly in accordance with provisions of Contract Appointment Policy, 2004

Validity

Petitioner, a legitimate expectant for the post, had applied in the year 2006, his ability was not disputed, any condition contained in the directions issued by the Secretary Education of Government of Punjab could not be applied in the petitioner's case in any respect, at the most direct recruitment by the Board could be made on contract following the Contract Policy of the Government of Punjab but the posts reserved for in-service quota could not be amenable to the letter issued by the Government of Punjab

Application of the petitioner and his colleagues of the year 2006 against the posts of Assistants should be deemed to be pending, which should be considered and finalized independent of letter issued by the Government Punjab, Education Department

Constitutional petition was allowed by High Court.

1999 PLC(CS) 86 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
"Seniority-cum-fitness"Connotation

Term "seniority-cum-fitness" connoted, that a senior person would be eligible for promotion if he was otherwise fit to hold that post.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Seniority-cum-fitness", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15358

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Seniority-cum-fitness"

PLC(CS) 2022
Writ Petition No.1127-D of 2017, decided on 25th January, 2021.

2022 P L C (C

FARMAN ULLAH Versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Chief Secretary, Peshawar and 4 others

Court: Peshawar High Court (D.I. Khan Bench)
PLC(CS) 1983
N/A

1983 P L C 692

USMAN GHANI Versus MESSRS MECHANIZED CONSTRUCTION OF PAKISTAN LTD. AND ANOTHER

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sind
PLC(CS) 1999
Civil Appeal No. 59 of 1997, decided on 23rd June, 1998.

1999 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD NAZIR CHAUDHRY Versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, MIRPUR through Chairman and 4 others

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
PLC(CS) 2024
Civil Petition No. 4513 of 2023, decided on 15th April, 2024.

2024 P L C (C

CHIEF COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, BAHAWALPUR and others Versus BAQA MUHAMMAD LASHARI

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2024
Civil Petition No. 4513 of 2023, decided on 15th April, 2024.

2024 S C M R 1164

CHIEF COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, BAHAWALPUR and others — Petitioners Versus BAQA MUHAMMAD LASHARI — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 1992
Service Appeal No. 367 of 1987, decided on 16th October, 1990.

1992 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAN Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Court: Service Tribunal AJ&K
SCMR 1984
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 64 of 1983, decided on 6th March, 1983.

1984 S C M R 288

MRS. S. J. USMANI-Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECY., EDUCATION AND OTHERS — Respondents

Court: ----S. 4-Appeal challenging grant of Selection Grade on basis of seniority-cum-fitness to respondents-Second appeal filed to challenge seniority of respondents dismissed by Tribunal as time-barred during pendency of earlier appeal and order not challenged by appellant in Supreme Court-Order of Tribunal dismissing first appeal on ground that issue of seniority, having been settled by earlier decision of Tribunal, could not be re-opened as Tribunal could not review its own earlier decision-Held, justified and does not merit interference. Civil service-Review.
PLD 1976
Constitutional Petition No. 245 of 1975, decided on 14th November 3 975.

P L D 1976 Karachi 102

WEST PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION‑Petitioner Versus THE SIND LABOUR COURT No. V, KARACHI AND ANOTHER- Respondents

Court:
PLC 1988
Appeal No.LHR‑106 of 1987, decided on 11th May, 1987.

1988 P L C 593

DIRECTOR (OPERATIONS), PUTC and another Versus RIAZ KHALID

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab
PLC(CS) 1994
Civil Petition No. 363 of 1993, decided on 24th November 1993.

1994 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAN Versus CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION CORPORATION and others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan