Seniority-cum-fitness
Seniority-cum-fitness legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Petitioner was eligible for promotion as Assistant on the basis of seniority-cum-fitness for the post reserved for selection from within office
Authorities took plea that Secretary Education of the Provincial Government had directed the Board to shift the mode of recruitment from regular to contract and to make all appointments against the post reserved for selection from within the office and direct recruitment on merit and to make strictly in accordance with provisions of Contract Appointment Policy, 2004
Validity
Petitioner, a legitimate expectant for the post, had applied in the year 2006, his ability was not disputed, any condition contained in the directions issued by the Secretary Education of Government of Punjab could not be applied in the petitioner's case in any respect, at the most direct recruitment by the Board could be made on contract following the Contract Policy of the Government of Punjab but the posts reserved for in-service quota could not be amenable to the letter issued by the Government of Punjab
Application of the petitioner and his colleagues of the year 2006 against the posts of Assistants should be deemed to be pending, which should be considered and finalized independent of letter issued by the Government Punjab, Education Department
Constitutional petition was allowed by High Court.
Term "seniority-cum-fitness" connoted, that a senior person would be eligible for promotion if he was otherwise fit to hold that post.
"Seniority-cum-fitness", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15358
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Seniority-cum-fitness"
2022 P L C (C
FARMAN ULLAH Versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Chief Secretary, Peshawar and 4 others
Court: Peshawar High Court (D.I. Khan Bench)1983 P L C 692
USMAN GHANI Versus MESSRS MECHANIZED CONSTRUCTION OF PAKISTAN LTD. AND ANOTHER
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sind1999 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD NAZIR CHAUDHRY Versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, MIRPUR through Chairman and 4 others
Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)2024 P L C (C
CHIEF COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, BAHAWALPUR and others Versus BAQA MUHAMMAD LASHARI
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2024 S C M R 1164
CHIEF COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, BAHAWALPUR and others — Petitioners Versus BAQA MUHAMMAD LASHARI — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1992 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAN Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Court: Service Tribunal AJ&K1984 S C M R 288
MRS. S. J. USMANI-Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECY., EDUCATION AND OTHERS — Respondents
Court: ----S. 4-Appeal challenging grant of Selection Grade on basis of seniority-cum-fitness to respondents-Second appeal filed to challenge seniority of respondents dismissed by Tribunal as time-barred during pendency of earlier appeal and order not challenged by appellant in Supreme Court-Order of Tribunal dismissing first appeal on ground that issue of seniority, having been settled by earlier decision of Tribunal, could not be re-opened as Tribunal could not review its own earlier decision-Held, justified and does not merit interference. Civil service-Review.P L D 1976 Karachi 102
WEST PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION‑Petitioner Versus THE SIND LABOUR COURT No. V, KARACHI AND ANOTHER- Respondents
Court:1988 P L C 593
DIRECTOR (OPERATIONS), PUTC and another Versus RIAZ KHALID
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab1994 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAN Versus CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION CORPORATION and others
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan