Sufficient cause
Sufficient cause legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Meaning.
Meaning.
Term "sufficient cause" has been defined by superior Courts as a cause which was beyond the control of the party and a strict proof of same was required to justify the absence due to sufficient cause
Requirements of "good cause" would, however, be complied with on a lesser degree of proof than that of "sufficient cause".
Ss. 203, 205, 206 & 73 -Principal and agent-Damages-Contract of agency -Termination of agency before expiry of agreed term Damages could be recovered only where such termination without "sufficient reason"-Loss of his reputation by agent-Could be considered "sufficient reason" for putting end to agency on part of principal- Whither there way "sufficient cause"-To be determined by circumstances of each case-Loss of reputation not mentioned in letter of revocation by principal as reason for termination of agency although there had been in fact some loss of reputation of agent on account of police action against him-Loss of reputation, in circumstance, although -may not be relied upon as furnishing "sufficient cause" for withdrawal of agency it nevertheless could be taken into consideration In assessing measure of damages-Breach of contract -Principles guiding Court in determination of measure of damages Compensation is payable for actual loss or damage caused
"Sufficient cause"-Not susceptible of exact definition-Each case to be judged on its own peculiar circumstances.
"Sufficient cause", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1538
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Sufficient cause"
2020 C L C 1652
EJAZ AHMAD through Attorney — Petitioner Versus RAI MUHAMMAD RIAZ (DECEASED) through Legal Heirs and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2001 P T D (Trib
N/A
Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan2022 M L D 831
MUHAMMAD KHALID MUNIR — Petitioner Versus NAZAR SADIQ and another — Respondents
Court: Islamabad2022 Y L R 2446
MUHAMMAD AYAZ — Applicant Versus AZHAR MEHMOOD — Respondent
Court: High Court (AJ&K)1963 P T D 434
BRAJABANDHU NANDA Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, BIHAR AND ORISSA
Court: Orissa India1999 Y L R 1123
MIRPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Chairman‑‑‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD HANIF CHAUDHRY‑‑Respondent
Court: Supreme Court (A J & K)2001 C L C 1689
WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Chairman, WAPDA, WAPDA House, Lahore‑‑‑Appellant Versus GULF COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. and 5 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2005 Supreme Court 29
MUHAMMAD ASHRAF — Petitioner Versus DISTRICT JUDGE, JHELUM and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2007 S C M R 866
ABDUL MAJID and others — Appellants Versus Mst. ZUBEDA BEGUM and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1961 Dacca 613
MESSRS GRAND TEA AND TRADING Co. CHITTAGONG ‑‑Appellant Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, EAST PAKISTAN DACCA‑Respondent
Court: High Court