Home Maxims & Terms Sufficient cause meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Sufficient cause

Sufficient cause legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2001 CLC 1689 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
......Sufficient" and "sufficient cause"

Meaning.

2001 PTD 1040 INCOME-TAX-APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-PAKISTAN Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases"Sufficient cause"

Meaning.

1990 CLC 1806 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
Words and PhrasesTerms "sufficient cause" and "good cause"Connotation

Term "sufficient cause" has been defined by superior Courts as a cause which was beyond the control of the party and a strict proof of same was required to justify the absence due to sufficient cause

Requirements of "good cause" would, however, be complied with on a lesser degree of proof than that of "sufficient cause".

1973 PLD 222 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Ss. 203, 205, 206 & 73 -Principal and agent-Damages-Contract of agency -Termination of agency before expiry of agreed term Damages could be recovered only where such termination without "sufficient reason"-Loss of his reputation by agent-Could be considered "sufficient reason" for putting end to agency on part of principal- Whither there way "sufficient cause"-To be determined by circumstances of each case-Loss of reputation not mentioned in letter of revocation by principal as reason for termination of agency although there had been in fact some loss of reputation of agent on account of police action against him-Loss of reputation, in circumstance, although -may not be relied upon as furnishing "sufficient cause" for withdrawal of agency it nevertheless could be taken into consideration In assessing measure of damages-Breach of contract -Principles guiding Court in determination of measure of damages Compensation is payable for actual loss or damage caused

1955 PLD 178 FEDERAL-COURT-OF-PAKISTAN Judicial Precedent

"Sufficient cause"-Not susceptible of exact definition-Each case to be judged on its own peculiar circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Sufficient cause", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1538

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Sufficient cause"

CLC 2020
merits instead of knocking out the parties on the basis of technicalities but whenever a suit was dismissed in default then plaintiff should mention a cause for such lapse---Provisions of O.IX, R.9, C.P.C. could not be dispensed with merely on the ground that suit was to be decided on merits---Court had to keep the scale of justice equal and provisions of O. IX, R.9, C.P.C. could not be used for the advantage of one party and disadvantage of the other---Parties should be vigilant while prosecuting their cause---Trial Court had rightly applied the law to the subject and application for restoration of suit was dismissed through a well-reasoned order---Impugned order passed by the Appellate Court was set aside and that of Trial Court was restored---Application for restoration of suit was dismissed, in circumstances---Revision was allowed accordingly

2020 C L C 1652

EJAZ AHMAD through Attorney — Petitioner Versus RAI MUHAMMAD RIAZ (DECEASED) through Legal Heirs and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PTD 2001
I.T.A. No. 809(IB) of 1997-98, decided on 16th October, 2000.

2001 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
MLD 2022
2021-September-22

2022 M L D 831

MUHAMMAD KHALID MUNIR — Petitioner Versus NAZAR SADIQ and another — Respondents

Court: Islamabad
YLR 2022
2022-April-7

2022 Y L R 2446

MUHAMMAD AYAZ — Applicant Versus AZHAR MEHMOOD — Respondent

Court: High Court (AJ&K)
PTD 1963
S.J.C. Nos. 8, 9 and 10 of 1956, decided on 11th April, 1960.

1963 P T D 434

BRAJABANDHU NANDA Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, BIHAR AND ORISSA

Court: Orissa India
YLR 1999
Civil Appeal No.4 of 1999, decided on 18th February, 1999.

1999 Y L R 1123

MIRPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Chairman‑‑‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD HANIF CHAUDHRY‑‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court (A J & K)
CLC 2001
Regular First Appeals Nos.471 and 472 of 1998; heard on 14th March, 2001.

2001 C L C 1689

WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Chairman, WAPDA, WAPDA House, Lahore‑‑‑Appellant Versus GULF COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. and 5 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2005
2004-October-7

P L D 2005 Supreme Court 29

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF — Petitioner Versus DISTRICT JUDGE, JHELUM and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 2007
Civil Appeal No.1377 of 2001, decided on 25th September, 2006.

2007 S C M R 866

ABDUL MAJID and others — Appellants Versus Mst. ZUBEDA BEGUM and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1961
1960-August-9

P L D 1961 Dacca 613

MESSRS GRAND TEA AND TRADING Co. CHITTAGONG ‑‑Appellant Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, EAST PAKISTAN DACCA‑Respondent

Court: High Court