Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Law helps vigilant and not indolent meaning in Urdu
Maxim Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Law helps vigilant and not indolent

Law helps vigilant and not indolent legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2000 PLC 355 LABOUR-APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Law helps vigilant and not indolent

Law helps vigilant and not indolent.

2000 PLC 134 LABOUR-APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Law helps vigilant and not indolent

Law helps vigilant and not indolent.

1999 SCMR 1326 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Law helps vigilant and not indolent Law would help vigilant and not the indolent.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Law helps vigilant and not indolent", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15422

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Law helps vigilant and not indolent"

PLC 2000
Revision Application No.KAR-12 of 1999, decided on 20th August, 1999.

2000 P L C 134

ASGHAR HUSSAIN Versus BOC GASES, BOC PAKISTAN LIMITED through Managing Director

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
PLC(CS) 2002
Appeals Nos.40(R), 112(R), 146(P), 270(R), 271(R), 359(R), 360(R), 361(R), 362(R), 374(R) of 1999, decided on 28th June, .1999.

2002 P L C (C

KHALID KARIM CHAUDHRY and others. Versus THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE and 3 others

Court: Federal Service Tribunal
PLC 2000
Revision Application No.KAR-348 of 1998, decided on 25th March, 1999.

2000 P L C 355

NAZIR MASEH Versus PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT NO.V, KARACHI and another

Court: Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal
CLC 2012
2012-May-21

2012 C L C 1453

Dr. BABUR HUSSAIN, ADVOCATE — Appellant Versus Ch. ISLAMUDDIN — Respondent

Court: Sindh
PLC 2020
Constitutional Petitions Nos. 889 to 931 of 2018, decided on 25th November, 2019.

2020 P L C 82

NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITED, through Authorized Officer and others Versus NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION and others

Court: Balochistan High Court
SCMR 1999
Civil Petition No.647 of 1996, decided on 16th January, 1998.

1999 S C M R 1326

AFTAB IQBAL KHAN KHICHI and another — Petitioners Versus Messrs UNITED DISTRIBUTORS PAKISTAN LTD., KARACHI — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
MLD 2015
merits, after hearing both the sides, and nobody should be condemned unheard, as maxim "Audi alteram partem", was very jealously and consistently followed by the courts, which was a principle of natural justice but at the same time keeping in view the conduct of the petitioner as manifest on the face of record showing his full knowledge about the proceedings and indicating his purposeful silence, the golden maxim that "law aids vigilant and not the indolent" could not be oversighted---Revision petition was dismissed

2015 M L D 157

ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA — Petitioner Versus ABDUL ALI — Respondent

Court: Peshawar
YLR 2022
2021-September-23

2022 Y L R 2154

ATTA MUHAMMAD and another — Petitioners Versus SARFARAZ

Court: Balochistan
MLD 2016
2015-June-15

2016 M L D 1524

Sheikh MUHAMMAD LATIF — Petitioner Versus Malik MUHAMMAD ASHIQ and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Multan (Bench)
PLC(CS) 2011
Writ Petition No.9144 of 2009, decided on 15th June, 2010.

2011 P L C (C

Mst. FAHMEEDA BIBI Versus D.C.O. and others

Court: Lahore High Court

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library