Statutes of Board of Studies in Medicine
Statutes of Board of Studies in Medicine legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Vires of Regln.3, Final Professional M.B.,B.S. (Revised Latest Scheme) Examination Regulations, on touchstone of Statutes framed under S. 31, University of the Punjab Act, 1973
Candidates appearing in final Professional M.B.,B.S. Examination were required to obtain 50 per cent. marks separately in practical and clinical tests
Petitioners having not obtained requisite marks, they were not declared to have passed such examination
Validity
Scheme of studies including duration of courses, number of subjects and papers for examination are to be provided by Statutes of Board of Studies in Medicine which were framed in terms of S. 31, University of the Punjab Act, 1973
Statutes do not prescribe any condition that candidate has to obtain 50 per cent. marks separately in practical and clinical tests in order to pass in relevant subject
Provision of S.32, University of the Punjab Act, 1973, postulates that subject to provisions of University of the Punjab Act, 1973, and the Statutes, Regulations might be made for matters specified therein
Regulations were thus, to be made subject to provisions of the Act and the Statutes, therefore, they could not take precedence over any of the two for those have to be framed in the light of Statutes and the Act
Regulation 3 of Final Professional M.B.,B.S. (Revised Latest Scheme) Examination Regulations was thus, in conflict with the Statutes framed under S.31, University of the Punjab Act, 1973, and would be ultra vires to the extent of its conflict with Statutes
Candidates appearing in Final Professional M.B.,B.S. Examination were not required to obtain 50 per cent. marks separately in each of the practical and clinical tests in order to pass in subject of Medicine
Award list prepared by Examiner whereby petitioners were declared to have passed in subject of Medicine being not in conflict with Statutes, petitioners would he deemed to have passed in the subject of Medicine.
"Statutes of Board of Studies in Medicine", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1572
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Statutes of Board of Studies in Medicine"
1996 C L 4 2050
ASIFA JAFFAR ALVI ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus UNIVERSITY OF PUNJAB‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore1994 M L D 279
ZAHEER HUSSAIN SHIRAZI — Petitioner Versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE, FAISALABAD and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2015 C L C 577
Dr. MUMTAZ AHMED and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: Islamabad2006 Y L R 2393
RASIKH AJMAL — Petitioner Versus UNIVERSTIY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, LAHORE through Vice-Chancellor
Court: Lahore2003 C L C 344
Dr. KHALID AZIZ, ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF FORENSIC MEDICINE AND TOXICOLOGY, K.E. MEDICAL COLLEGE; LAHORE and 10 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus VICE‑CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE and 5 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2023 C L C 1947
JUDICIAL ACTIVISM PANEL and others — Petitioners Versus The FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2018 Sindh 222
ROCHE PAKISTAN LIMITED through Authorized Attorney — Plaintiff Versus PAKISTAN through Secretary and 3 others — Defendants
Court: High Court2010 P L C (C
Dr. NAJAM IQBAL AHMED Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and others
Court: Lahore High CourtP L D 1957 (W
LT.-COL. AZIZ K. M. KHAN-Petitioner Versus A. B. A. HALEEM, Vice-Chancellor, University of Karachi and another-Respondents
Court: Held, (Constantine, J. agreeing with Akhlaque Husain, J.) that there is nothing in the Act itself which indicates that a "Dean -cannot carry out the duties of Dean unless he continues to be a Head of a Department. The Legislature by subsec tion (5) of section 22 (University of Karachi Act) read with section 18 has given to the Senate the power of determining the tenure of a Dean and has not qualified this power by any express condition. If the Senate in the exercise of the discretion granted to it by the Act has said that a Dean shall hold office for three years, Statute 10(4) (a) then prima facie he is entitled to hold office for this period unless the Senate provides otherwise by Statute.2004 C L C 955
AISHA HAIDER and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus PAKISTAN MEDICAL DENTAL COUNCIL, ISLAMABAD through Secretary and 5 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore