Home Maxims & Terms Statutes of Board of Studies in Medicine meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Statutes of Board of Studies in Medicine

Statutes of Board of Studies in Medicine legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1996 CLC 2050 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 31 & 32Final Professional M.B.,B.S. (Revised Latest Scheme) Examination Regulations, Regln. 3Statutes of Board of Studies in MedicineConstitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199Constitutional petitionLegal status of Regulations and Statutes of Board of Studies in Medicines

Vires of Regln.3, Final Professional M.B.,B.S. (Revised Latest Scheme) Examination Regulations, on touchstone of Statutes framed under S. 31, University of the Punjab Act, 1973

Candidates appearing in final Professional M.B.,B.S. Examination were required to obtain 50 per cent. marks separately in practical and clinical tests

Petitioners having not obtained requisite marks, they were not declared to have passed such examination

Validity

Scheme of studies including duration of courses, number of subjects and papers for examination are to be provided by Statutes of Board of Studies in Medicine which were framed in terms of S. 31, University of the Punjab Act, 1973

Statutes do not prescribe any condition that candidate has to obtain 50 per cent. marks separately in practical and clinical tests in order to pass in relevant subject

Provision of S.32, University of the Punjab Act, 1973, postulates that subject to provisions of University of the Punjab Act, 1973, and the Statutes, Regulations might be made for matters specified therein

Regulations were thus, to be made subject to provisions of the Act and the Statutes, therefore, they could not take precedence over any of the two for those have to be framed in the light of Statutes and the Act

Regulation 3 of Final Professional M.B.,B.S. (Revised Latest Scheme) Examination Regulations was thus, in conflict with the Statutes framed under S.31, University of the Punjab Act, 1973, and would be ultra vires to the extent of its conflict with Statutes

Candidates appearing in Final Professional M.B.,B.S. Examination were not required to obtain 50 per cent. marks separately in each of the practical and clinical tests in order to pass in subject of Medicine

Award list prepared by Examiner whereby petitioners were declared to have passed in subject of Medicine being not in conflict with Statutes, petitioners would he deemed to have passed in the subject of Medicine.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Statutes of Board of Studies in Medicine", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1572

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Statutes of Board of Studies in Medicine"

CLC 1996
Writ Petition No.2311 of 1996, decided on 8th May, 1996.

1996 C L 4 2050

ASIFA JAFFAR ALVI ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus UNIVERSITY OF PUNJAB‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
MLD 1994
N/A

1994 M L D 279

ZAHEER HUSSAIN SHIRAZI — Petitioner Versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE, FAISALABAD and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 2015
2015-January-16

2015 C L C 577

Dr. MUMTAZ AHMED and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: Islamabad
YLR 2006
Writ Petition No.912 of 2006, decided on 16th March, 2006.

2006 Y L R 2393

RASIKH AJMAL — Petitioner Versus UNIVERSTIY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, LAHORE through Vice-Chancellor

Court: Lahore
CLC 2003
Writ Petition No. 6888 of 1993, decided on 11th July, 2002.

2003 C L C 344

Dr. KHALID AZIZ, ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF FORENSIC MEDICINE AND TOXICOLOGY, K.E. MEDICAL COLLEGE; LAHORE and 10 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus VICE‑CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE and 5 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 2023
2023-June-8

2023 C L C 1947

JUDICIAL ACTIVISM PANEL and others — Petitioners Versus The FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2018
2017-October-12

P L D 2018 Sindh 222

ROCHE PAKISTAN LIMITED through Authorized Attorney — Plaintiff Versus PAKISTAN through Secretary and 3 others — Defendants

Court: High Court
PLC(CS) 2010
N/A

2010 P L C (C

Dr. NAJAM IQBAL AHMED Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and others

Court: Lahore High Court
PLD 1957
Writ Petition No. 201 of 1955, decided on 19th December 1956. On difference between B. Z. Kaikaus, J and Akhlaque Husain. J. the case was referred to Constantine, J. and disposed of by the Division Bench in accordance with the opinion of Constantine, J.

P L D 1957 (W

LT.-COL. AZIZ K. M. KHAN-Petitioner Versus A. B. A. HALEEM, Vice-Chancellor, University of Karachi and another-Respondents

Court: Held, (Constantine, J. agreeing with Akhlaque Husain, J.) that there is nothing in the Act itself which indicates that a "Dean -cannot carry out the duties of Dean unless he continues to be a Head of a Department. The Legislature by subsec tion (5) of section 22 (University of Karachi Act) read with section 18 has given to the Senate the power of determining the tenure of a Dean and has not qualified this power by any express condition. If the Senate in the exercise of the discretion granted to it by the Act has said that a Dean shall hold office for three years, Statute 10(4) (a) then prima facie he is entitled to hold office for this period unless the Senate provides otherwise by Statute.
CLC 2004
Writ Petitions Nos.2633, 2565 and 4354 of 2003, decided on 22nd December, 2003.

2004 C L C 955

AISHA HAIDER and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus PAKISTAN MEDICAL DENTAL COUNCIL, ISLAMABAD through Secretary and 5 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore