Home Maxims & Terms Immediate meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Immediate

Immediate legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2004 CLC 1949 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Immediate", meaning of

Term `immediate' would mean doing of a thing at once and without delay.

2003 YLR 570 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases

"Immediate ", defined and explained.

2003 CLC 282 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases

`Immediate', meaning and scope explained.

1988 PLC(CS) 668 LABOUR-APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-PUNJAB Judicial Precedent
Words and PhrasesWord "immediate"Meaning of

Word "immediate" would mean, with nothing between; not acting by second causes; direct, present; without delay.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Immediate", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15734

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Immediate"

MLD 2001
2001-April-30

2001 M L D 1716

MUHAMMAD SUBHAN and others — Petitioners Versus MIR QADAM KHAN and others — Respondents.

Court: Peshawar
YLR 2003
N/A

2003 Y L R 570

NOOR KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GHULAM QASIM and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1955
Petition No. 55 of 1953 for Succession Certificate in respect of certain Securities belonging to Mr. Shamsul Hasan, son of Shafiqul Hasan deceased, decided on 30th September, 1953.

P L D 1955 Sind 33

Court:
MLD 2015
2014-March-21

2015 M L D 1228

SAADULLAH KHAN — Petitioner Versus SABIR KHAN — Respondent

Court: Peshawar
CLC 2003
Civil Revision No.933/D of 2002, decided on 3rd July, 2002.

2003 C L C 282

ALI MUHAMMAD ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD ‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
CLC 2004
2004-June-16

2004 C L C 1949

MUHAMMAD ALI and another — Petitioners Versus ALLAH BAKHSH and 5 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2007
2006-December-12

P L D 2007 Supreme Court 302

Mian PIR MUHAMMAD and another — Appellants Versus FAQIR MUHAMMAD through L. Rs. and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1981
Criminal Petition for special Leave to Appeal No. 591 of 1980, decided on 24th November, 1980.

P L D 1981 Supreme Court 106

PROF. MUHAMMAD HANIF TAHIR‑Petitioner Versus The STATE‑Respondent

Court: S--.350 as amended by Criminal Procedure Code (Second Amendment) Ordinance (VIII of 1980‑No principle of law enjoins hearing of a case only by such Court as has taken down evidence‑Even if any principle existed to contrary same taken away by amendment in S. 350‑Successor Court even though not having taken down evidence, held, now per mitted to proceed with case without recording fresh evidence and it makes no difference whether immediate successor or successor of immediate successor howlowsoever disposes of case.
PLD 2010
2010-May-17

P L D 2010 Lahore 341

SAIFULLAH and 6 others — Petitioners Versus MEHR MUHAMMAD and 3 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
YLR 2014
Civil Revision No.3051 of 2013, decided on 1st April, 2014.

2014 Y L R 1605

ABID HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus NAZAR MUHAMMAD and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore