Home Maxims & Terms Expression meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Expression

Expression legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2004 PLD 307 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Expression "Terms" and "Part", defined and explained.

2004 MLD 319 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Expression "Free from all encumbrances "

Meaning and import.

2000 MLD 1454 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Words and PhrasesExpression "Extinguishments of any rights therein"

Defined and elaborated.

1999 PTD 1358 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Words and PhrasesExpression "opportunity of being heard"

Connotation.

1993 MLD 2539 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Words and PhrasesExpression " Ghair Kabiz"ConnotationExpression " Ghair Kabiz" literally means out of possession

Such entry in the record-of-rights, by itself would not affect a co-owner's status as owner of land in question.

1989 MLD 1156 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Words and PhrasesExpression. "sufficient cause"

Meaning.

1971 PLD 311 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases

Expression "after giving parties opportunity of being heard" and word "aggrieved"-Meaning.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Expression", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15878

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Expression"

PTD 1999
I.T.As. Nos.349/KB to 351/KB of 1998-99, decided on 19th December, 1998.

1999 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
CLD 2014
2014-May-13

2014 C L D 1696

MUHAMMAD KASHAN — Plaintiff Versus COCA COLA CORPORATION PAKISTAN LIMITED through Chief Executive Officer and 3 others — Defendants

Court: Sindh
SCMR 2019
Civil Appeals Nos. 1269 to 1273 of 2013, decided on 31st January, 2019.

2019 S C M R 1643

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE,RTO, RAWALPINDI — Appellant Versus Messrs TRILLIUM PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD.,RAWALPINDI and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 2019
Civil Appeals Nos. 1269 to 1273 of 2013, decided on 31st January, 2019.

2019 P T D 2072

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE,RTO, RAWALPINDI — Appellant Versus Messrs TRILLIUM PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD., RAWALPINDI and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1960
Letters Patent Appeal No. 1 of 1954, decided on 16th December 1959.

P L D 1960 (W

ANJUMAN IMDAD QARZA, CHAK No. 105‑R.B. — Appellant Versus ABDUL HAQ and others‑Respondents

Court:
PTD 1998
Income-tax Reference No.9 of 1994, decided on 21st August, 1996.

1998 P T D 3427

GEORGE WILLIAMSON (ASSAM) LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: 223 I T R 203
PTD 1965
Civil Appeals Nos. 142 and 143 of 1963, decided on 31st March 1964.

1965 P T D 15

BANARSI DEBI AND ANOTHER Versus INCOME‑TAX OFFICER, DISTRICT IV, CALCUTTA, AND OTHERS

Court: Supreme Court India
PLC(CS) 1985
Intra Court Appeal No. 103 of 1983, decided on 11th April, 1983.

1985 P L C (C

PUNJAB GOVERNMENT and others Versus SALEEM‑UR‑REHMAN and others

Court: Lahore High Court
PTD 2009
I.T.A. No.404/LB of 2009, decided on 31st July, 2009.

2009 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
MLD 2018
2017-November-23

2018 M L D 875

AZHAR BAKHTIAR KHILJI — Appellant Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore