Clog
Clog legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Connotation.
"Clog", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1790
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Clog"
1995 C L C 1701
MUBARAK ALI and 5 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Mst. NOOR JEHANA and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: PeshawarP L D 1971 Peshawar 28
MUREED KHAN-Appellant Versus MOHAMMAD KHAN AND 2 OTHERS-Respondents
Court:1985 S C M R 190
Mirza AKBAR ALI — Petitioner Versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN — Respondent
Court: ---Art. 182 as repealed by Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972--Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 48--Clog contained in Art. 182 on right of decree-holder that he was required to institute second or subsequent application for execution of decree within a period of three years from dismissal of last application having been removed by Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972, held, would not subsist after its repeal- Judgment-debtor could not claim a vested right out of same--Principle applicable in giving effect to S .48, C . P . C . could not be extended to Art. 182, Limitation Act, 1908.1986 S C M R 321
Present: Muhammad Haleem, C.J., Aslam Riaz Hussain and Shafiur Rahman, JJ Versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN‑‑Respondent
Court: High Court1982 S C M R 430
MESSRS VULCAN COMPANY LIMITED-Petitioner Versus THE PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB AND OTHERS-Respondents
Court: High Court2020 P Cr
Mst. BILQIS BANO and another — Appellants Versus PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS HOUSING AUTHORITY through Administrator and 5 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh1988 S C M R 587
A.A.FACTORY, P.O.F. BOARD, WAH CANTT. — Petitioner Versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE,
Court: High CourtP L D 1978 Lahore 1104
HAFIZULLAH MALIK AND 38 OTHERS-Petitioners Versus LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND 2 OTHERS-Respondents
Court:P L D 1994 Peshawar 211
AMANULLAH and 2 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD HASSAN and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑‑ Interpretation of document is strictly a question of law and not of fact.‑‑Question of law.2012 Y L R 824
MUHAMMAD TARIQ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore