Home Maxims & Terms Additional Commisioner meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Additional Commisioner

Additional Commisioner legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1992 CLC 629 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
"Commissioner" and "Additional Commissioner"

Distinction of the two terms/offices elaborated.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Additional Commisioner", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1879

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Additional Commisioner"

MLD 1986
Writ 1978,heard on 5th February 1986.

1986 M L D 1006

GHULAM MUHAMMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (LANDS)/ ADDITIONAL SETTELEMENT COMMISIONER (LAHORE)

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1983
Criminal Miscellaneous No: 1 of 1981, in Criminal A ppeal No. 425 of 1981, decided on 24th August, 1981.

1983 P Cr

MUSHTAQ AHMAD-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Court: Lahore
MLD 1986
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 322‑of 1985, decided on 9th March 1986.

1986 M L D 1221

RAZA HUSSAIN and 3 others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE and another‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PTD 1985
Income‑tax Reference No.589 of 1972, decided on 25th October, 1983.

1985 P T D 157

THE COMMISIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, KARACHI Versus ISMAIL ADAMJEE

Court: Karachi High Court
SCMR 2000
of 1999, decided on 28th December, 1999,

2000 S C M R 1440

SAYYED HASSAN through Legal Heirs‑‑‑Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB, LAHORE and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 1998
Civil Appeal No. 1699 of 1984, decided on 4th February, 1998.

1998 P T D 2644

S. RM. M. CT. M. TIRUPPANI TRUST Versus COMMISIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: 230 I T R 636
MLD 1990
Writ Petition No. 4446 of 1988, decided on 26th May, 1990..

1990 M L D 1807

Syed MANZOOR HUSSAIN BOKHARI and another Petitioners Versus S.P., CITY LAHORE and 2 others‑‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑S.30 as amended by Police Act (Punjab Amendment) Ordinance,(VIII of 1984)‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts. 16 & 20‑‑‑Interpretation of S. 3( (before addition of second proviso)‑‑‑Provision of second proviso as added, in S.30 by Punjab Ordinance (VIII of 1984), goes beyond the scope of Arts. 16 and 20(a) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), so far as it relates to "public interest" which is a much wider phrase than the "public order" used in Arts. 16 & 20 of the Constitution and to that extent it is ultra vires of Arts. 16 & 20 of the Constitution.‑‑Vires of statute.
PTD 1985
Income‑tax Reference No. 31 of 1972, decided on 10th May, 1984.

1985 P T D 3

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX (EAST) Versus Messrs CRESCENT PAK SOAP &‑OIL MILLS Ltd.

Court: Karachi High Court
PLD 1984
Constitutional Petition No. D‑130 of 1983, decided on 6th February,

1984K37

Mi,s SHAMA AHSAN‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SIND AND 6 OTHERs‑‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑ R. 8‑Provisional Constitution Order (1 of 1981), Art. 9‑Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S. 3‑Appeal against issue of permanent residence certificate ‑ Limitation ‑ Waiver of question of limitation, held, not permissible‑Admission on part of counsel could not absolve authority from its statutory duty to examine question of limitation in proper pers pective and to decide same correctly.‑ Waiver‑Admission.