Interpretation of Procedural Provisions
Interpretation of Procedural Provisions legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Definition not found in search database.
"Interpretation of Procedural Provisions", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1994
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Interpretation of Procedural Provisions"
1991 C L C 563
PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Works, Islamabad ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus Mrs. KHALID NAZIR ‑‑‑ Respondent
Court: Lahore1981CLC 601
Appellant Versus SIR E, H. JAFFER & SONS LTD.‑Respondent
Court: Karachi2025 SCMR 570
SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LTD. (SNGPL), ISLAMABAD — Petitioner Versus Messrs S.K. PVT. LIMITED and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1985 C L C 283
Messrs FAKHRI TRADERS — Petitioners Versus Mst. BATOOL FIDA HUSSAIN SHEIKH and 4 others-Respondents
Court: KarachiP L D 1984 Supreme Court 54
KHUSHI MUHAMMAD-Appellant Versus JAMAT ALI AND OTHERS-Respondents
Court:1990 M L D 416
SURYABALI and others Petitioners Versus THE VITH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, DEORIA and others‑‑Respondents
Court: Allahabad High Court (India)P L D 1991 Supreme Court 787
Mst. AMEER KHATUN‑‑Appellant Versus FAIZ AHMED and others‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑‑ S. 340(2) as amended ‑‑‑ Import, effect and implication of amendments made in S.340, Cr.P.C. on the rights of an accused facing trial ‑‑‑ Provision of S.340(2), Cr.P.C. as amended has to be interpreted as only conferring a duty or a power on the Court to inform the accused that he has a right under the law to make a statement on oath and it is his option with no risk attaching it to either make the statement or not to make the statement ‑‑‑ Section 340(2), Cr.P.C. has no compulsive effect on the accused‑‑‑No adverse inference can be drawn if accused does not opt to make a statement ‑‑‑ Omission of Court to inform the accused that he had been conferred such a right ‑‑‑ Effect.2026 P L C (C
UZAIR AHMAD Versus KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION and others
Court: Peshawar High CourtP L D 1997 Peshawar 166
FAIZ MUHAMMAD and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus MEHRAB SHAH and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑‑S. 417(2‑A) as inserted by Code of Criminal Procedure (Second Amendment) Act (XX of 1994)‑‑‑Suppression of Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), S.7‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), 5.302/34‑‑‑Appeal against judgment of Special Court‑‑‑Right of appeal against judgment of Special Court was granted under S.7 of Suppression of Terrorist Activities (Special Court) Act, 1975 either to the convict or the State but no right of appeal was granted to the private complainant under that section as envisaged by S.417(2‑A) of Cr.P.C.‑‑‑Subsection (2‑A) of 5.417, Cr.P.C. giving right of appeal to aggrieved person against order of acquittal was added by Code of Criminal Procedure (Second Amendment) Act, 1994 much after promulgation of Suppression of Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act, 1975‑‑‑By addition of subsection (2‑A) in S.417, Cr.P.C. it could be gathered that wherever Legislature wanted to extend right of appeal, it would extend same by positive Legislation and wherever it did not want to extend that right, it would not make Legislation.1992 C L C 1437
SARDAR AKHTAR ALI ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus WASIM AHMED ‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Election Tribunal Sindh