Home Maxims & Terms Disqualification meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Disqualification

Disqualification legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2003 PLD 14 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases"Disqualification"

Meaning.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Disqualification", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/20705

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Disqualification"

CLC 1996
Writ Petition No. (Nil) of 1996, decided on 18th June, 1996.

1996 C L C 1842

SHUJAH HAIDER ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER, AZAD J&K and 8 other‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Azad J&K
CLC 1980
Writ Petition No. 5019 of 1979; decided on 1st October, 1979.

1980 C L C 1

MUHAMMAD KHAN — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD SARFARAZ KHAN -Ex. — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2013
2013-April-23

P L D 2013 Lahore 509

RASHID — Petitioner Versus RETURNING OFFICER, NANKANA SAHIB — Respondent

Court: High Court
CLC 1995
Writ Petitions Nos. 230 and 231 of 1994, decided on 21st March, 1994.

1995 C L C 402

AKHTAR HUSSAIN SHAH and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Pir SABIR SHAH‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Peshawar
SCMR 2016
Civil Petition No. 3181 of 2015, decided on 6th November, 2015.

2016 S C M R 430

ZAHID IQBAL — Petitioner Versus Hafiz MUHAMMAD ADNAN and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1962
Writ Petition No. 401 of 1960, decided on 11th April 1962.

P L D 1962 (W

PEHALWAN KHAN-Petitioner Versus (1) J. F. ELAHI, MAGISTRATE, 1ST CLASS, JHELUM EXERCISING THE POWERS OF AN ELECTION TRIBUNAL (KHARIAN, TEHSIL) UNDER THE WEST PAKISTAN BASIC DEMOCRACIES ELECTION RULES, 1959, AND

Court: (a) Basic Democracies Order (18 of 1959), Second Schd, Part II, para. 2 (c) (f ) read with Cl. (d), Art 5, Elective Bodies (Disqualification) Order (13 of 1959) - Clauses (c) and ( f ) of para. 2 not inconsistent - Disqualification incurred under cl. (d), Art. 5, Elective Bodies (Disqualification) Order, 1959, to be given effect to under cl. (f ) By majority : Changez and Bashir Ahmed, JJ., Shabby Ahmad, J. contra- Muhammad Nawaz Khan v. The Collector, District Gujranwala P L D 1960 Lah. 1123 not approved.
PLD 1962
Civil Appeal No. 46 of 1961, decided on 10th April 1962.

P L D 1962 Supreme Court 370

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ KHAN‑Appellant Versus (1) THE COLLECTOR, GUJRANWALA AND

Court: (b) Basic Democracies Order (18 of 1959)---Second Sched., Part II, para. 2 (c), (f) read with Elective Bodies (Disqualification) Order (13 0f 1959), Art. S (1) (d)‑Sub paras. (c) and (f) not inconsistent‑‑‑Effect to be gives to sub‑para. (f) in terms of Art. 5 (1) (d) of Order (13 of 1959)‑Sentence of Imprisonment for more than 2 years disqualifies for being candidate for election under Order (18 of 1959)‑Muhammad Nawaz Khan v. Collector, District Gujranwala P L D 1960 Lah. 1123 reversed‑Majority view in Pehalwan Khan v. J. F. Elahi P L D 1962 Lah. 751 (F. B.) approved.
SCMR 1980
Civil Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal Nos. 987 and 1000 of 1979, decided on 18th December, 1979.

1980 S C M R 156

UMAR DRAZ CHEEMA-Petitioner Versus NAZAR MUHAMMAD AND OTHERS-Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1982
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 13-R of 1982, decided on 17th February, 1982.

1982 S C M R 418

ABDUL HALEEM-Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AMIN KHAN AND ANOTHER-Respondents

Court: Art. 10 (2) (aa) as added by Houses of Parliament and Provincial Assemblies (Elections) (Second Amendment) Order 1977 (P. O. No. 7), Art. 2 read with N: W. F. P. Local Government Ordinance (1V of 1979, Ss. 28(g) & 34 (1-a)-Election-Disqualification- Retrospec tivity of statutes-Contended that disqualification under P. O. No. 5 being regarding the then "forthcoming elections" to be held in October 1977 expression "forthcoming elections" could not be invoked for elec tions in 1979, and therefore disqualification in P. O. No. 5 could not be read by reference under cl. (g) of S. 28 of Ordinance IV o f 1979 Held: Amending Order No. 7 of 1979 though not making any separate provision for retrospective application of cl. (g) of S. 28 of Ordi nance IV of 1979 yet its retrospective application inherent in language used in S. 28 itself-Section 34 (1-a) additionally strengthens such disqualification by providing for removal of a member of Local Council from his office if he "has incurred any of the disqualification S enum erated in section 28" which includes disqualification in cl. (g) of S. 28.
CLC 1981
Constitutional Petition No. D‑1483 of 1980, decided on 11th November, 1980.

1981 C L C 260

JUMMA KHAN‑Petitioner Versus MEHAR ALI AND 3 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: Karachi