Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Laid out meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Laid out

Laid out legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

Planned, arranged, or marked out (e.g., land plots or plans).

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Laid out", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21149

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Laid out"

PTD 1969
N/A

1969 P T D 220

BINODIRAM BALCHAND Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, M.P.

Court: Madhya Pradesh (India)
PTD 1996
I.T.A. No. 208/IB of 1993-94, decided on 28th September, 1995.

1996 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 1971
Tax Case No. 82 of 1964, decided on 18th December 1967.

1971 P T D 161

AMARJOTHI PICTURES Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, MADRAS

Court: Madras (India)
PTD 1998
D.B.I.T. Reference No.44 of 1986, decided on 8th May, 1996

1998 P T D 3291

JAIPUR ELECTRO (PVT.) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: 223 I T R 535
PTD 1971
Tax Case No. 262 of 1964 (Reference No. 69 of 1964), decided on 4th April 1968.

1971 P T D 533

ERODE TRANSPORTS (PVT.) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, MADRAS

Court: Madras (India)
PTD 1972
Civil Appeal No. 591 of 1967, decided on 2nd August 1968.

1972 P T D 625

J. K. WOOLLEN MANUFACTURERS Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, U. P.

Court: Income tax-----Business expenditure Manufacture and sale of blankets and other woollen cloth‑General Manager‑.Commission ,a profits‑Disallowance of part‑Whether permissible‑Indian Income‑tax Act, 1922, S. 10(2)(xv)‑J. K. Wooden Manufacturers (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income‑tax (1963) 48 I T R 346 reversed.
PTD 1964
Whether a particular item of expenditure is "laid out or expended for the cultivation, upkeep or maintenance of immature plants" is essentially a question of fact and cannot be decided on any general principle of law. All that can be said is that the connection between the item of expenditure and the cultivation, upkeep or maintenance of immature plants must be definite and real, and not vague or illusory.

1964 P T D 764

COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURAL INCOME‑TAX, KERALA Versus JOHNSONS ESTATES AND AGENCIES (PRIVATE) LTD.

Court: Kerala (India)
PTD 1964
Income‑tax Reference No. 7 of 1961, decided on 19th October 1962.

1964 P T D 477

J. R. PATEL & SONS PRIVATE LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, GUJARAT

Court: Gujarat (India)
SCMR 1981
Civil Appeal No. 32!P to 34/P of 1972, decided on 16th March, 1981.

1981 S C M R 1029

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-Appellant Versus MESSRS M. BAHAR AHMAD & SONS-Respondents

Court: S. 10 (2) (iii), (xvi)-Special leave to appeal-Granted to consider contention that cl. (iii) of S. 10 (2), being a special provision dealing with payment of interest, excludes application of S. 10 (2) (xvi), a pro vision of general nature and that if allowance on account of interest not admissible under cl. (iii), same not admissible at all.-Leave to appeal
PTD 1989
I.TA, No.2779/KB of 1986-87, decided on 5th January, 1989.

1989 PTD (Trib) 254

N/A

Court: High Court

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library