Home Maxims & Terms Juvenile Court meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Juvenile Court

Juvenile Court legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2020 PCrLJ 627 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 8, 4 & 2(b)Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 167Age determination ofJuvenile courtProcedure when investigation cannot be completed within twenty-four hoursScope

Section 2(b) of Juvenile Justice System Act, 2018 defines a child as a person who at the time of commission of offence has not attained the age of 18 years

Juvenile Court is established under S. 4 of the Juvenile Justice System Act, 2018 to deal with such cases

Certain privileges are granted to "child"-accused through Juvenile Justice System Act, 2018 some of which pertain to arrest, bail, release on probation and prohibition of inflicting capital sentence, etc

Section 8 of Juvenile Justice System Act, 2018 obligates the Officer Incharge of Police Station or the Investigating Officer to determine the acclaimed age of juvenile from his birth certificate, educational certificates or any other relevant document from the very inception of investigation

Juvenile is to be medically examined only if there is no other trustworthy documentary proof in support of his age plea

Findings about the age of an accused who physically appears to be a juvenile is to be given by the court before whom he is brought under S. 167, Cr.P.C. and that too before granting his further detention

Such findings are to be based on the record made available before the court including report prepared by the police officer or the medical examination report, if any.

1950 PLD 70 SINDH-CHIEF-COURT Judicial Precedent
Juvenile Court Juvenile Court

Advocates should not figure very prominently when evidence is recorded. The trial of a juvenile should not ordinarily be permitted to assume the contentious character of an ordinary criminal trial, and it is clear that no prejudice is likely to be caused and, on the contrary, much injury to the delinquent child may be prevented, if such trials are so conducted that advocates do not figure very prominently when evidence is recorded. Advocates appearing for juveniles ought themselves to bear this in mind, and help the 'Courts to function as juvenile Courts.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Juvenile Court", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21539

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Juvenile Court"

MLD 2005
Writ Petition No.5246 of 2004, heard on 30th September, 2004.

2005 M L D 1028

ALEEM ASHRAF ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
MLD 2005
Constitution Petition No. D‑1093 and C. M. A. No. 1163 of 2000, heard on 2nd April, 2001.

2005 M L D 353

KETNO‑‑‑Petitioner Versus JUDGE, ANTI‑TERRORISM COURT, SPECIAL COURT FOR ATA and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 2012
N/A

P L D 2012 Lahore 433

UMAR AFZAL — Petitioner Versus SPECIAL JUDGE, ANTI-TERRORISM COURT NO.2, RAWALPINDI and 3 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
YLR 2001
Criminal Revision No. 221 of 2001, decided on 27th June, 2001.

2001 Y L R 2060

MUHAMMAD HANIF‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD YAQOOB and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2014
2013-October-1

P L D 2014 Peshawar 127

MIAN KHAN — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: High Court
PLD 1955
Criminal Appeal No. 84 of 1947, decided on 31st March, 1948.

P L D 1955 Sind 405

MUHAMMAD ALAM‑ — Appellant Versus THE CROWN — ‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1950
Criminal Appeal No. 84 of 1947, decided on 31st March, 1948.

P L D 1950 Sind 70

MAHOMED ALAM Appellant Versus CROWN‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1974
Criminal Revision Application No. 144 of 1971, decided on 22nd April 1974.

P L D 1974 Karachi 459

MUHAMMAD AHMAD alias ANJUM‑ — Applicant Versus THE STATE — ‑Respondent

Court:
SCMR 2012
Civil Petitions Nos. 1517 of 2011, 246-Q and 270-Q of 2010, decided on 19th October, 2011.

2012 S C M R 201

WALI MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE through Prosecutor-General, Balochistan and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PCRLJ 2025
2024-July-19

2025 P Cr

Rehana Nazir — Petitioner Versus District Police Officer, Gujrat and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore