Home Maxims & Terms Wakf meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Wakf

Wakf legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2009 CLC 1421 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
WakfMutawalli, appointment ofPrinciple

Office of Mutawalli cannot remain vacant, any other person can be appointed Mutawalli, if the incumbent had not appointed his successor in his life time

In the present case, neither the founder had nominated the successor of the Mutawalli (one mentioned) in the Wakf deed nor the named Mutawalli had nominated his successor

Anjuman, through its office-bearers, took over Mutawalliship of the Wakf property by congregation and such appointment was valid.

2009 CLC 1421 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
WakfMutawalli, powers ofScopeMutawalli can sell the dedicated property, if such power was conferred upon him expressly

In the present case, the deed of Wakf expressly conferred power upon "M" (named trustee in the will) to sell or mortgage the Wakf property and the only condition which had been imposed in the will, was that sale proceeds will be utilized for the improvement and benefit of the mosque

"M" having died in the year 1938, power of sale or mortgage passed on the Mutawalli who succeeded him.

2009 CLC 1421 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
WakfWakf by immemorial userEffectUtilization of the property donated for the purpose of a specific mosque through an Anjuman constituted a valid Wakf

Property utilized for religious purpose for the time immemorial can be treated as Wakf by user and court can infer that property used for the purpose of mosque etc. does not stand merely by leave and licence of the owner and is no longer property of the original owner

Dedicated property, in the present case, remained in the use of an Anjuman for the benefit of a specified mosque in the Wakf deed for the considerable long period being Wakf by user

Property remained validly in the hands of Anjuman, office-bearers of the Anjuman who found that mosque was in dilapidated condition, required construction, sold the Wakf property and utilized its sale proceeds on the reconstruction of the mosque

Sale transaction which was completed as far back as in the year 1940, could not be set at naught after 63 years

Managing Committee of the mosque/objectors to such sale had failed to justify unreasonable delay in taking action at the relevant time and had to establish that Managing Committee of the mosque for which the property was dedicated was the successor of Mutawalli appointed by the donor/founder

Sale proceeds were utilized in the year 1940 for the reconstruction of the mosque as was specified in the Wakf deed

Sale proceeds of Wakf property therefore, were utilized according to the desire of the founder as expressly mentioned in the Wakf deed.

1964 PLD 575 DHAKA-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Wakf - Wakf-alai-aulad, private wakf, but all private wakfs are not wakf-alai-aulad-Bengal Wakf Act (XIII of 1934), S. 6 (11).

1963 PLD 343 DHAKA-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Wakf

Wakf-alal-aulad-Can be created Ar maintenance and support wholly or partially of family, children or descendants of wakif without allotment of any sum out of income for charitable purpose during their life-Ultimate benefit must be reserved for purpose recognized by Muslim Law though deferred till extinction of family's children and descendants of wakif-Mere provision for sum for public charities without specifying property thereto does not validate wakf to that extent-"Family"-Term comprehensive, may include persons not related to wakif or distant kindred who cannot be called descendants-"Heirs of children" to inherit wakif's property, (provision in wakfnama)-Wakfnama, held, invalid as heirs may include not members of family nor children nor descendants-Mussalman Wakf Validating Act (VI of 1913).

1961 PLD 993 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Wakf Waqf-Property dedicated to God - Income used by Managers as their own-Misuse.

1953 PLD 144 DHAKA-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Suit in respect of-Forum-To be deter mined by C. P. C. (V of 1908), S. 15-Court of Munsif competent to entertain suit.

1952 PLD 72 DHAKA-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Estate sued in name of wrong persons as Mutwalli-Decree not binding on estate.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Wakf", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21659

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Wakf"

PLD 1964
Appeal from Original Decree No. 133 of 1959, decided on 29th July 1963.

P L D 1964 Dacca 575

FOWZUL ALI KHAN‑Appellant Versus COMMISSIONER OF WAKFS, EAST PAKISTAN AND Others‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1967
Writ Petition No. 582 of 1964, decided on 24th November 1965.

P L D 1967 Dacca 1

Al‑Haj Agha GHOLAM HOSAIN SHERAZEE‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN AND OTHERS Respondents

Court:
PLD 1954
Appeal Side No. 74 of 1952-53, decided on 30th November 1953, from District Lahore.

P L D (Rev

Nawab SIR MUZAFFAR ALI QAZILBASH-Petitioner Versus THE CROWN-Respondent

Court:
PLD 2016
2014-November-12

P L D 2016 Lahore 28

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Social Welfare and another — Appellant Versus Mirza KHALID SHAFIQUE BAIG and 3 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1958
Constitutional Civil Appeals Nos. (1) 2/D of 1956 in Writ Petition No. 22 of 1956‑Muhammad Mahdi Ali Khan Panni Petitioner v. The Province of East Pakistan and another Respondents ; (2) 3/D of 1956 in Writ Petition No. 62 of 1956: Syed Muhammad Ali‑Petitioner v. The Province of East Pakistan and another‑Respondents ; (3) 4/D of 1956 in Writ Petition No. 18 of 1956‑Khurram Khan Panni ---Petitioner v. The Province of East Pakistan and another--- Respondents ; (4) 3 of 1956 in Writ Petition No. 14 of 1956 Shah Zillur Rahman Chowdhury‑--Petitioner v. The Province of East Pakistan and another‑Respondents ; (5) 13 of 1956 in Writ Petition No. 17 of 1956‑Maulvi Fatadad Gaznvi Petitioner v. The Province of East Pakistan and another ‑Respondents; (6) 28 of 1956 in Writ Petition No. 67 of 1956‑Enayet Hosain Choudhury‑Petitioner v. The Province of East Pakistan and another‑Respondents ; (7) 31 of 1956 in Writ Petition No. 32 of 1956‑Yar Ali Khan‑Petitioner v. The Province of East Pakistan and another‑Respondents ; (8) 34 of 1956 in Writ Petition No. 28 of 1956‑Mr. A. B. M. Shayesta Khan‑Petitioner v. The Province of East Pakistan and another‑Respondents, decided on 20th December 1957. (Division Bench judgment on 26th August 1957).

P L D 1958 Dacca 203

MUHAMMAD MAHDI ALI KHAN PANNI and others‑Petitioners Versus THE PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN and another — Respondents

Court:
PLD 1952
Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 542 of 1944, decided on 30th August, 1950, against the decree of Subordinate Judge, Second Court of Zilla Chittagong, dated the 13th September, 1943, in other appeal No. 150 of 1943 affirming the decree of Munsif, 5th Court at Sadar, Chittagong, dated the 12th June, 1943.

P L D 1952 Dacca 72

AZIZAR RAHMAN‑Plaintiff‑Appellant Versus SUDHANGSHU KUMAR MITRA and another‑Respondents

Court:
SCMR 1984
Civil Petition No. 905 of 1983, decided on 11th February, 1984.

1984 S C M R 1427

Mian INAM KARIM and others — Petitioners Versus Mirza ISRAR-UL-QADIR and others — Respondents

Court: ---Art. 185(3)--Mohammedan Law--Wakf Alal-Aulad--Sale of Wakf property--Court to give effect to express wishes of founder so far as possible but can authorise sale of Wakf property for investing proceeds in any shape considered conducive to proper maintenance of wakf even though Wakf had not expressly reserved power of sale--View of High Court not exceptionable--Leave to appeal refused. --Muhammadan Law.
PLD 1960
Revision Application No. 91 of 1959, decided on 3rd March 1960.

P L D 1960 (W

Haji MIAN JAN‑Applicant Versus FAKIR MOHAMMAD and another‑Opponents

Court:
CLC 1983
Civil Revision No. 1478 of 1980, decided on .23rd May, 1983.

1983 C L C 1648

Mian INAM KARIM AND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus Mirza ISRARUL QADIR AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1952
Appeal from Original Decree No. 57 of 1945, decided on 18th June, 1951 against the decree of Naresh Chandra Roy Subordinate judge, 3rd Court of Zillah Chittagong, dated the 3rd June, 1944 in Partition Suit No. 7 of 1942.

P L D 1952 Dacca 206

Appellants Versus FIROZ AHMAD CHOWDHURY and others

Court: