Wakf
Wakf legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Office of Mutawalli cannot remain vacant, any other person can be appointed Mutawalli, if the incumbent had not appointed his successor in his life time
In the present case, neither the founder had nominated the successor of the Mutawalli (one mentioned) in the Wakf deed nor the named Mutawalli had nominated his successor
Anjuman, through its office-bearers, took over Mutawalliship of the Wakf property by congregation and such appointment was valid.
In the present case, the deed of Wakf expressly conferred power upon "M" (named trustee in the will) to sell or mortgage the Wakf property and the only condition which had been imposed in the will, was that sale proceeds will be utilized for the improvement and benefit of the mosque
"M" having died in the year 1938, power of sale or mortgage passed on the Mutawalli who succeeded him.
Property utilized for religious purpose for the time immemorial can be treated as Wakf by user and court can infer that property used for the purpose of mosque etc. does not stand merely by leave and licence of the owner and is no longer property of the original owner
Dedicated property, in the present case, remained in the use of an Anjuman for the benefit of a specified mosque in the Wakf deed for the considerable long period being Wakf by user
Property remained validly in the hands of Anjuman, office-bearers of the Anjuman who found that mosque was in dilapidated condition, required construction, sold the Wakf property and utilized its sale proceeds on the reconstruction of the mosque
Sale transaction which was completed as far back as in the year 1940, could not be set at naught after 63 years
Managing Committee of the mosque/objectors to such sale had failed to justify unreasonable delay in taking action at the relevant time and had to establish that Managing Committee of the mosque for which the property was dedicated was the successor of Mutawalli appointed by the donor/founder
Sale proceeds were utilized in the year 1940 for the reconstruction of the mosque as was specified in the Wakf deed
Sale proceeds of Wakf property therefore, were utilized according to the desire of the founder as expressly mentioned in the Wakf deed.
Wakf - Wakf-alai-aulad, private wakf, but all private wakfs are not wakf-alai-aulad-Bengal Wakf Act (XIII of 1934), S. 6 (11).
Wakf-alal-aulad-Can be created Ar maintenance and support wholly or partially of family, children or descendants of wakif without allotment of any sum out of income for charitable purpose during their life-Ultimate benefit must be reserved for purpose recognized by Muslim Law though deferred till extinction of family's children and descendants of wakif-Mere provision for sum for public charities without specifying property thereto does not validate wakf to that extent-"Family"-Term comprehensive, may include persons not related to wakif or distant kindred who cannot be called descendants-"Heirs of children" to inherit wakif's property, (provision in wakfnama)-Wakfnama, held, invalid as heirs may include not members of family nor children nor descendants-Mussalman Wakf Validating Act (VI of 1913).
Wakf Waqf-Property dedicated to God - Income used by Managers as their own-Misuse.
Suit in respect of-Forum-To be deter mined by C. P. C. (V of 1908), S. 15-Court of Munsif competent to entertain suit.
Estate sued in name of wrong persons as Mutwalli-Decree not binding on estate.
"Wakf", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21659
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Wakf"
P L D 1964 Dacca 575
FOWZUL ALI KHAN‑Appellant Versus COMMISSIONER OF WAKFS, EAST PAKISTAN AND Others‑Respondents
Court:P L D 1967 Dacca 1
Al‑Haj Agha GHOLAM HOSAIN SHERAZEE‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN AND OTHERS Respondents
Court:P L D (Rev
Nawab SIR MUZAFFAR ALI QAZILBASH-Petitioner Versus THE CROWN-Respondent
Court:P L D 2016 Lahore 28
PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Social Welfare and another — Appellant Versus Mirza KHALID SHAFIQUE BAIG and 3 others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1958 Dacca 203
MUHAMMAD MAHDI ALI KHAN PANNI and others‑Petitioners Versus THE PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN and another — Respondents
Court:P L D 1952 Dacca 72
AZIZAR RAHMAN‑Plaintiff‑Appellant Versus SUDHANGSHU KUMAR MITRA and another‑Respondents
Court:1984 S C M R 1427
Mian INAM KARIM and others — Petitioners Versus Mirza ISRAR-UL-QADIR and others — Respondents
Court: ---Art. 185(3)--Mohammedan Law--Wakf Alal-Aulad--Sale of Wakf property--Court to give effect to express wishes of founder so far as possible but can authorise sale of Wakf property for investing proceeds in any shape considered conducive to proper maintenance of wakf even though Wakf had not expressly reserved power of sale--View of High Court not exceptionable--Leave to appeal refused. --Muhammadan Law.P L D 1960 (W
Haji MIAN JAN‑Applicant Versus FAKIR MOHAMMAD and another‑Opponents
Court:1983 C L C 1648
Mian INAM KARIM AND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus Mirza ISRARUL QADIR AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1952 Dacca 206
Appellants Versus FIROZ AHMAD CHOWDHURY and others
Court: