Home Maxims & Terms Adulteration meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Adulteration

Adulteration legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1969 PLD 927 DHAKA-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Ss. 7 & 44 - Adulteration - Identity of articles sent to Analyst or Chemical Examiner not established- No proof that articles examined were same as recovered from accused-Sealed sample bottles taken from accused's shop and tested by Analyst not produced before Court-Report of Analyst, in circumstances, held, of no use as evidence-Conviction sit aside.

1954 PLD 317 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Adulteration Adulteration-Ghee-Standard of Purity given in Central Government's Pamphlet Preferred to expert treatises not relating to Punjab.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Adulteration", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21716

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Adulteration"

PCRLJ 1979
Writ Petition No. 1510 of 1979, decided on 2nd June, 1979.

1979 P Cr

ALTAF AHMAD-petitioner Versus THE STATE AND ANOTHRR — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1962
Criminal Appeal No. 725 of 1959, decided on 4th May 1962.

P L D 1962 (W

THE STATE-Appellant Versus Mirza AMIR BEG-Respondent

Court:
PLD 1961
Criminal Revision No. 793 of 1960, decided on 19th June, 1961.

P L D 1961 (W

MESSRS Haji ILAHI BAKHSH‑UMAR HAYAT‑ — Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑ — Respondent

Court: Punjab Pure Food Act (XVIII of 1929), S. 13‑Whether sale of adulterated food by other than manufacturer not indictable Whether actual sale and not mere exposure for sale of adulterated food necessary for conviction‑Sat Pal Tara Chand v. Lahore Municipality A I R 1941 Lah. 158 overruled.
MLD 1992
Infra‑Court Appeals Nos.127 and 128 of 1989, decided on 28th October, 1991

1992 M L D 481

PROVINCIAL QUALITY CONTROL BOARD and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus IRZA PHARMA and others ‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1951
Criminal Revision No. 765 of 1950, decided on 6th November 1950. Case taken up by the Court on its own motion under section 435, Criminal Procedure Code, for revision of the order of the Additional District Magistrate, Lahore, dated the 1st July 1950, convicting the respondent.

P

CROWN‑Petitioner Versus FLATTIES ASSOCIATED HOTELS OF INDIA Convict‑Respondent

Court: Sentences were enhanced from double to ten times the fine imposed by the trial Magistrate.
PLD 1964
Criminal Revision No. 91 of 1962, decided on 6th July 1962.

P L D 1964 Dacca 152

CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT COUNCIL, KUSHTIA‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER‑Opposite‑Parties

Court:
PCRLJ 1975
Criminal Revision Application No. 7 of 1973, decided on 15th May 1975.

1975 P Cr

ABDUL QAYUM‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 2006
2005-July-6

2006 P Cr

SHAHID KARIM — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
MLD 2012
2011-September-13

2012 M L D 77

SAIF-UR-REHMAN and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE through S.H.O. P.S. Neelor, Islamabad — Respondent

Court: Islamabad
PCRLJ 1999
N/A

1999 P Cr

IFTIKHAR AHMAD alias BILLU — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore