Home Maxims & Terms Declaratory Decree meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Declaratory Decree

Declaratory Decree legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2024 CLC 428 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Ss. 42, 43 & 54Suit for declaration and injunctionDeclaratory decreeApplicabilityConcurrent findings of facts by two Courts belowApplicants on the basis of power of attorney in their favour claimed their right in suit propertyTrial Court decreed the suit against the person who executed power of attorney in favour of applicantsJudgment and decree passed by Trial Court was maintained by Lower Appellate CourtPlea raised by applicants was that judgments and decrees were not binding on them as they were not party to the suitValidity

No judgment and decree, by virtue of S.43 of Specific Relief Act, 1877, passed in a suit would be binding on a person unless such person is a party to the suit or is claiming through any party to the suit

Claim of applicants was based on having acquired right in suit land by way of a registered sale deed through power of attorney which had been declared as illegal, forged and fabricated in judgment and decree passed by Trial Court, therefore, the decree was binding on applicants

High Court declined to interfere in concurrent findings of facts by two Courts below as the same did not suffer from jurisdictional defect nor there was any infirmity or illegality

Revision was dismissed in circumstances.

2020 SCMR 202 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 60Registered documentPresumptionScopeRegistered document had some presumptions attached to it under S. 60 of the Registration Act, 1908

Although such presumptions were rebuttable, but for their rebuttal a party must produce evidence on the basis of standard as set forth by the (Supreme) Court.

2019 YLR 401 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 42Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Art. 120Suit for declarationLimitationMutation, attestation ofScopeDeclaratory decreeScopeContention of plaintiff was that impugned mutation was result of collusion of defendantsSuit was dismissed by the Trial Court but Appellate Court decreed the sameValidity

Neither original mutation had been challenged nor transferees of the land had been impleaded as defendants in the present suit

Suit had been filed with a delay of more than twenty years which was barred by time

Limitation for filing a suit for declaration was six years from the date when right to sue accrued

Declaratory decree could declare pre-existing rights but could not the new one

Present suit was not competent

Trial Court had rightly dismissed the same

Impugned judgment and decree passed by the Appellate Court were set aside and those of Trial Court were restored

Suit was dismissed with costs throughout

Revision was allowed in circumstances.

2016 CLC 114 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 42Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), S.54Declaratory decreeSuit for declarationAgreement to sellNature

Declaration of title could not be granted in favour of a plaintiff who claimed a right in immovable property on basis of agreement to sell

Declaratory decree declared a pre-existing right and could not create or confer a new right.

2016 YLRN 53 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 42Declaratory decreeScope

Declaratory decree could declare a pre-existing right and could not create or confer a new right.

2015 CLC 1196 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 42Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.XXI, Rr.10 & 11Declaratory decreeNot executable, but implementable in record, if necessary

Principles.

2013 MLD 565 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S.42Declaratory decreeScope

Such decree declares a pre-existing right and it does not create a new right in favour of plaintiff.

1963 PLC 235 Judicial Precedent

Declaratory Decree Pointing out illegality of Government action-Government expected to honour declaration.

1963 PLD 211 DHAKA-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Declaratory Decree -Pointing out illegality of Government action-Government expected to honour declaration.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Declaratory Decree", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/22197

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Declaratory Decree"

CLC 1981
Regular Second Appeal No. 547 of 1979, decided on 5th April, 1980.

1981 C L C 1712

MUNIR HUSSAIN‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD SHAFT AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1972
Civil Review Petition No. 20 of 1971, decided on 1st December 1971,

1972 S C M R 1

MUHAMMAD YOUSAF KHAN AND OTHERS — Petitioners Versus PAKISTAN WESTERN RAILWAY THROUGH

Court: High Court
CLC 2002
N/A

2002 C L C 1029

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Collector, Faisalabad and 2 others — Petitioners Versus NISHAT TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED SHEIKHUPURA ROAD, FAISALABAD — Respondent

Court: Lahore
YLR 2015
Regular Second Appeal No.41 of 1995, decided on 4th July, 2014.

2015 Y L R 1352

Mst. FATIMA BIBI through Legal Heirs and others — Appellants Versus Mst. IRSHAD BEGUM and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 1997
J.C. C.S.A. No. 6 of 1994, decided on 8th October, 1995.

1997 M L D 745

Raja SHAH ZAMAN and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus ZAMINDARAN BIRGAL through Representatives‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Chief Court Gilgit
PLD 1982
Regular Second Appeal No. 642 of 1980, decided on 2nd February, 1982.

P L D 1982 Lahore 426

FALAK SHER‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD RASHID AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court:
SCMR 1983
Civil Petition No. 949 of 1981, decided on 22nd June, 1982.

1983 S C M R 159

ADMINISTRATOR, THAI DEVELOPMENT-Petitioner Versus MEHBOOB ALI KHAN-Respondent

Court: --3 as amended by Law Reforms (Amendment) Act (VIII of 1972 Inter-Court Appeal-Competency-Leave to appeal to Supreme Court Granted to consider contention that view of High Court as to intra Court appeal being not competent was a misreading, misinterpretation and misconstruction of S. 3-Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3).
PLD 1957
19th November 1956 under section 115, Civil Procedure Code for revision of the order of Zafar‑A‑Mahmood, Civil Judge, IV Class, Lahore, dated the 2nd January 1956

P L D 1957 (W

Mst. WAZIR BEGUM‑Plaintiff‑Petitioner Versus Haji ASHIQ HUSSAIN and six others‑Defendants

Court: High Court
MLD 1996
12th February 1996

1996 M L D 1102

NOOR HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus ALLAH DITTA and 13 others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
SCMR 1974
Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 88 of 1973, decided on 2nd October 1973.

1974 S C M R 203

NHIR AHMAD‑Petitioner Versus THE CHAIRMAN, PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT

Court: High Court