Declaratory Decree
Declaratory Decree legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
No judgment and decree, by virtue of S.43 of Specific Relief Act, 1877, passed in a suit would be binding on a person unless such person is a party to the suit or is claiming through any party to the suit
Claim of applicants was based on having acquired right in suit land by way of a registered sale deed through power of attorney which had been declared as illegal, forged and fabricated in judgment and decree passed by Trial Court, therefore, the decree was binding on applicants
High Court declined to interfere in concurrent findings of facts by two Courts below as the same did not suffer from jurisdictional defect nor there was any infirmity or illegality
Revision was dismissed in circumstances.
Although such presumptions were rebuttable, but for their rebuttal a party must produce evidence on the basis of standard as set forth by the (Supreme) Court.
Neither original mutation had been challenged nor transferees of the land had been impleaded as defendants in the present suit
Suit had been filed with a delay of more than twenty years which was barred by time
Limitation for filing a suit for declaration was six years from the date when right to sue accrued
Declaratory decree could declare pre-existing rights but could not the new one
Present suit was not competent
Trial Court had rightly dismissed the same
Impugned judgment and decree passed by the Appellate Court were set aside and those of Trial Court were restored
Suit was dismissed with costs throughout
Revision was allowed in circumstances.
Declaration of title could not be granted in favour of a plaintiff who claimed a right in immovable property on basis of agreement to sell
Declaratory decree declared a pre-existing right and could not create or confer a new right.
Declaratory decree could declare a pre-existing right and could not create or confer a new right.
Principles.
Such decree declares a pre-existing right and it does not create a new right in favour of plaintiff.
Declaratory Decree Pointing out illegality of Government action-Government expected to honour declaration.
Declaratory Decree -Pointing out illegality of Government action-Government expected to honour declaration.
"Declaratory Decree", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/22197
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Declaratory Decree"
1981 C L C 1712
MUNIR HUSSAIN‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD SHAFT AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1972 S C M R 1
MUHAMMAD YOUSAF KHAN AND OTHERS — Petitioners Versus PAKISTAN WESTERN RAILWAY THROUGH
Court: High Court2002 C L C 1029
PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Collector, Faisalabad and 2 others — Petitioners Versus NISHAT TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED SHEIKHUPURA ROAD, FAISALABAD — Respondent
Court: Lahore2015 Y L R 1352
Mst. FATIMA BIBI through Legal Heirs and others — Appellants Versus Mst. IRSHAD BEGUM and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1997 M L D 745
Raja SHAH ZAMAN and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus ZAMINDARAN BIRGAL through Representatives‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Chief Court GilgitP L D 1982 Lahore 426
FALAK SHER‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD RASHID AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court:1983 S C M R 159
ADMINISTRATOR, THAI DEVELOPMENT-Petitioner Versus MEHBOOB ALI KHAN-Respondent
Court: --3 as amended by Law Reforms (Amendment) Act (VIII of 1972 Inter-Court Appeal-Competency-Leave to appeal to Supreme Court Granted to consider contention that view of High Court as to intra Court appeal being not competent was a misreading, misinterpretation and misconstruction of S. 3-Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3).P L D 1957 (W
Mst. WAZIR BEGUM‑Plaintiff‑Petitioner Versus Haji ASHIQ HUSSAIN and six others‑Defendants
Court: High Court1996 M L D 1102
NOOR HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus ALLAH DITTA and 13 others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)1974 S C M R 203
NHIR AHMAD‑Petitioner Versus THE CHAIRMAN, PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT
Court: High Court