Home Maxims & Terms Full Bench meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Full Bench

Full Bench legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1970 PLD 289 DHAKA-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Full Bench - Larger Bench specifically constituted may reverse decision given by Full Bench-High Court Rules (Dacca), Vol. I, Chap. If, r. 7.

1965 PLD 31 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Full Bench Question referred not "only" question arising in case-Full Bench framed another question arising in case, but not referred, and proceeded to answer same.

1962 PLD 381 DHAKA-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Full Bench Full Bench - Reference - Questions not formulated by referring Bench-Full Bench itself may formulate questions.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Full Bench", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/22240

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Full Bench"

PLD 1965
Review Petition No. 8 of 1963, decided on 16th October 1963

P L D 1965 Azad J & K 5

MUSHTAQ AHMAD SETHI‑Petitioner Versus AZAD J. & K. GOVERNMENT‑Respondent

Court:
PLC 2020
Writ Petition No.23 of 2020, decided on 13th February, 2020.

2020 P L C 184

PAKISTAN RAILWAY through CEO/Sr. General Manager Pakistan Railways Headquarters, Lahore Versus LEARNED MEMBER, NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION through Registrar National Industrial Relation Commission,Islamabad and 4 others

Court: Islamabad High Court
PLC 1991
Writ Petition No. 2697 of 1991, decided on 15th April, 1991.

1991 P L C 766

PRESIDENT OF UNITED BANK LTD. Versus UNITED BANK EMPLOYEES FEDERATION and others

Court: Lahore High Court
PLC 2016
W.P. No.815 of 2016, decided on 9th March, 2016.

2016 P L C 271

PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION Versus FULL BENCH, NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, ISLAMABAD and another

Court: Islamabad High Court
PLC 2001
Case No. 12(93) of 1998, decided on 20th November, 1998.

2001 P L C 454

ORGANISATION POSTAL EMPLOYEES, NOPE CBA, KARACHI and others Versus ZAFAR IQBAL, SECRETARY‑GENERAL NATIONAL ORGANISATION

Court: National Industrial Relations Commission'
SCMR 1981
Civil Appeal No. 58 of 1973, decided on 9th March, 1981.

1981 SCMR 520

SHER MUHAMMAD-Appellant Versus ADDITIONAL REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER, MULTAN

Court: -----Art. 189-Decisions of Supreme Court-Binding nature of-Deci sion of Full Bench of High Court though ordinarily binding on Single Judge or Bench of two Judges seized of same matter, yet such rule not absolute and must yield where a more compulsive and supervening constitutional provision like Art. 189 of 1973 Constitution or similar provisions of previous constitutional enactments took over-Decision of Supreme Court being admittedly on a question of law, High Court, held, rightly preferred Supreme Court decision over decision of Full Bench of High Court.-Precedent.
PLC 2019
N/A

2019 P L C 63

Messrs GERRY'S DNATA (PVT.) LTD. through Manager and 7 others Versus NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION and 7 others

Court: Sindh High Court
YLR 1999
Civil Appeal No. 124 of 1998, decided on 8th July, 1999.

1999 Y L R 2473

GUL MUHAMMAD KHAN ‑Appellant Versus CUSTODIAN, EVACUEE PROPERTY AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court (A J & K)
PLD 1995
Writ Petition No.5268 of 1992, decided on 10th October, 1994.

P L D 1995 Lahore 143

ABDUL QAYYUM KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court:
PLC 2020
C.P. No.D-1983 of 2019, decided on 28th May, 2019.

2020 P L C 180

RAFIQUE AHMED SHAIKH Versus NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION (NIRC) and 3 others

Court: Sindh High Court